Miro Reviews

Signed Pages Reviews

Miro mentions (232)

• An infinite canvas for code exploration

  To fix this, I added a digital whiteboard to my workflow, and this is phenomenal. You can use any digital whiteboard, such as https://www.figma.com/figjam/, https://excalidraw.com/, https://miro.com/, or https://obsidian.md/canvas. My workflow generally goes like:. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

• A list of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings that have free tiers of interest to devops and infradev

  Miro - Scalable, secure, cross-device, and enterprise-ready collaboration whiteboard for distributed teams. With a freemium plan. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• Initial impressions and questions

  For your project, you actually might have a better time using Miro. I use Miro for doing pretty much any kind of presentation of grammar for my classes (I'm a language teacher) and love the ease and flexibility with which you can organise neat looking flow charts. Source: 6 months ago

• 10 key features of online collaboration tools and software

  Getting together around a whiteboard is one of the most productive ways for people to collaborate in a room together. Miro recreates that easy collaboration for remote teams with its multiplayer online whiteboards. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago

• How We Started Managing BSA Delivery Processes on GitHub

  We also had other tools in use, such as Miro. This tool was primarily used for visualizing certain process flows, like document change approval processes. Or at some point, we considered using boards in Asana because non-delivery processes were managed in that tool. However, when we contemplated the move to Asana, I decided to explore other potential tools. After reading many articles and conducting some research,... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

Signed Pages mentions (12)

• E2EE on the web: is the web that bad?

  There is "Signed Pages" by the debeloper of EteSync. It is a browser extension, that checks webapps based on signatures in the html file. The addon then warns the user if the signature is not correct or - if I remember correctly - the source changed. This allows you to be sure what webapp code was delivered. But it seems like it did not really get used outside of his own projects. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

• Cloudflare and CDNs - call for community opinions

  EteSync has implemented something called Signed Pages, this might be worth looking closer at. This uses PGP keys which is preloaded into the browser; but I suspect that will be a barrier too high for most non-tech users. Source: about 1 year ago

• Truly safe?

  There are also projects like signed web pages which can also help increasing the trust level to some degree. But that requires that you can download the source code and regenerate the verification hash locally - or have other trusted methods to verify the hash value hasn't been modified as well. The current concept is reasonably sane, but it requires too much from users currently to make it widely used. Source: almost 2 years ago

• Security experts declare all Proton apps secure after security audit

  > The server can at any time start serving malicious payloads True, and I call this threat model "Beware Each and Every Fetch" (BEEF) in contrast to the more common TOFU model (although if you trust a desktop app to auto-update itself then these two models might not be all that different). In any case, I think you're being a little quick to dismiss the idea of server-hosted applications. It's true that browsers... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

• ProtonMail Is Inherently Insecure, Your Emails Are Likely Compromised

  Something like a browser extension for this does already exist, fortunately: https://github.com/tasn/webext-signed-pages. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago