Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Signed Pages VS The Security Checklist

Compare Signed Pages VS The Security Checklist and see what are their differences

Hyperview
DCIM software reinvented. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Signed Pages logo Signed Pages

A browser extension to verify the authenticity of websites

The Security Checklist logo The Security Checklist

The Practical Security Checklist for Web Developers
  • Signed Pages Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-05
  • The Security Checklist Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-07

Signed Pages features and specs

  • Security Enhancement
    Signed Pages provides an additional security layer by ensuring the authenticity and integrity of web content. This is particularly beneficial in preventing man-in-the-middle attacks and unauthorized content modifications.
  • Data Integrity
    By validating digital signatures, users can trust that the content they receive is exactly what the creator intended, which helps in maintaining data integrity.
  • Trust Establishment
    It helps in building trust between web content providers and users by verifying the source of web pages through cryptographic signatures.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, it allows for transparency and community-driven improvements, meaning that developers can audit, contribute to, and customize the code.

Possible disadvantages of Signed Pages

  • Implementation Complexity
    Integrating Signed Pages into existing systems can be complex, particularly for developers unfamiliar with digital signatures and cryptographic practices.
  • Performance Overhead
    The process of validating and signing pages can introduce additional computational load and latency, potentially affecting the performance of web applications.
  • Key Management Challenges
    Effective key management is critical, and mishandling private keys or certificates could compromise the security benefits that Signed Pages aims to provide.
  • User Adoption Hurdles
    For end-users, understanding and trusting the concept of digital signatures could be a hurdle, which affects widespread adoption and usability.

The Security Checklist features and specs

  • Comprehensive Coverage
    The checklist covers a wide range of security aspects including authentication, data protection, and error handling, making it a thorough guide for developers.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, the checklist is freely accessible for anyone to use, modify, and contribute to, fostering community collaboration.
  • Developer-Centric
    Designed with developers in mind, it provides practical and actionable security measures that can be directly applied to software projects.
  • Regular Updates
    As a GitHub repository, it can receive ongoing updates from contributors, ensuring that it remains current with evolving security threats and practices.
  • Easy Integration
    The checklist format is straightforward, making it easy for teams to integrate into their existing development workflows and checklists.

Possible disadvantages of The Security Checklist

  • Lack of Context
    The checklist may not provide enough background information or context for why each item is important, potentially leaving less experienced developers without a full understanding.
  • Generic Recommendations
    Some of the advice can be quite generic and might not be suitable for all projects or industries, as security requirements can vary significantly depending on the context.
  • Dependency on Contributor Updates
    While being open-source, the content relies on community contributions for updates, which could lead to periods of being outdated if not actively maintained.
  • Variable Depth
    The depth of information on each point varies, meaning some topics might be covered in detail while others are only briefly mentioned, which could require further research.
  • Potential Overwhelm
    The sheer number of items in the checklist may overwhelm developers, especially those new to security practices, making it challenging to prioritize tasks.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Signed Pages and The Security Checklist)

Signed Pages

The Security Checklist

Tech
26 26%
Tech
74% 74
Developer Tools
22 22%
Developer Tools
78% 78
SaaS
27 27%
SaaS
73% 73
Sales
31 31%
Sales
69% 69

User comments

Share your experience with using Signed Pages and The Security Checklist. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Signed Pages seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Signed Pages mentions (13)

  • Web-based cryptography is always snake oil
    There are some efforts to use extensions to allow signing/verification of web assets (assuming you trust the extension/browser), some via third parties: https://github.com/tasn/webext-signed-pages https://github.com/jahed/webverify https://github.com/facebookincubator/meta-code-verify There was another one posted here recently, but I'm unable to find it now. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • E2EE on the web: is the web that bad?
    There is "Signed Pages" by the debeloper of EteSync. It is a browser extension, that checks webapps based on signatures in the html file. The addon then warns the user if the signature is not correct or - if I remember correctly - the source changed. This allows you to be sure what webapp code was delivered. But it seems like it did not really get used outside of his own projects. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Cloudflare and CDNs - call for community opinions
    EteSync has implemented something called Signed Pages, this might be worth looking closer at. This uses PGP keys which is preloaded into the browser; but I suspect that will be a barrier too high for most non-tech users. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Truly safe?
    There are also projects like signed web pages which can also help increasing the trust level to some degree. But that requires that you can download the source code and regenerate the verification hash locally - or have other trusted methods to verify the hash value hasn't been modified as well. The current concept is reasonably sane, but it requires too much from users currently to make it widely used. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Security experts declare all Proton apps secure after security audit
    > The server can at any time start serving malicious payloads True, and I call this threat model "Beware Each and Every Fetch" (BEEF) in contrast to the more common TOFU model (although if you trust a desktop app to auto-update itself then these two models might not be all that different). In any case, I think you're being a little quick to dismiss the idea of server-hosted applications. It's true that browsers... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
View more

The Security Checklist mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of The Security Checklist yet. Tracking of The Security Checklist recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Signed Pages and The Security Checklist, you can also consider the following products

Marshal - Quickly scan your cloud for exposed sensitive information.

Google Capture the Flag 2017 - Google's 2nd annual worldwide security competition

Trustpage - Building trust with customers just got easier

The SaaS CTO Security Checklist - The security checklist all CTOs should follow

SafeBase - SafeBase is the interactive security portal to share your security posture, automate access to sensitive compliance information, and subscribe to vendor security program updates.

Sqreen - Sqreen is a web application security monitoring and protection solution helping companies protect their apps and users from attacks. Get started in minutes.

Loading...