Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Mikro orm VS AWS Batch

Compare Mikro orm VS AWS Batch and see what are their differences

Mikro orm logo Mikro orm

TypeScript ORM for Node.js based on Data Mapper, Unit of Work and Identity Map patterns.

AWS Batch logo AWS Batch

AWS Batch enables developers, scientists, and engineers to easily and efficiently run hundreds of thousands of batch computing jobs on AWS.
  • Mikro orm Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-10
  • AWS Batch Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-21

Mikro orm features and specs

  • TypeScript Support
    MikroORM provides first-class TypeScript support, which ensures type safety and better tooling support for developers using TypeScript in their applications.
  • Supports Multiple Databases
    It is compatible with several relational databases like MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, and even NoSQL databases like MongoDB, allowing flexible database management.
  • Lightweight and Efficient
    Designed to be lightweight, MikroORM offers efficient query performance and lower memory overhead compared to some heavier ORMs.
  • Active Community and Documentation
    MikroORM's documentation is comprehensive and the community is active, which makes it easier for developers to find help and resources.
  • Entity Management
    MikroORM allows powerful entity management, including features like lifecycle hooks, auto-flushing, and fully typed data models.

Possible disadvantages of Mikro orm

  • Complexity for Beginners
    New developers might find MikroORM complex compared to simpler solutions like Sequelize, particularly due to its rich feature set and TypeScript integration.
  • Learning Curve
    The learning curve can be steep for those unfamiliar with TypeScript or ORM concepts since it requires understanding both to use effectively.
  • Less Mature than Some Alternatives
    Being a relatively newer ORM, it may lack some of the battle-tested features and stability found in more established ORMs like TypeORM or Sequelize.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    MikroORM might not support certain advanced use-cases or specific database features out-of-the-box, potentially requiring custom solutions.

AWS Batch features and specs

  • Scalability
    AWS Batch automatically provisions the optimal quantity and type of compute resources based on the volume and specific resource requirements of the batch jobs submitted.
  • Cost-Effectiveness
    By using AWS Batch, you only pay for the resources you consume, and it provides integration with Spot Instances which can significantly lower costs.
  • No Infrastructure Management
    AWS Batch removes the need to manage server clusters or other infrastructure, allowing users to focus entirely on jobs and workloads.
  • Flexible Job Definitions
    Users can easily specify job definitions to model their machine learning, batch processing, or other computational tasks, allowing for flexibility in resource allocation.
  • Integration with AWS Services
    AWS Batch integrates with various AWS services like Amazon CloudWatch, AWS Lambda, and AWS IAM to provide a comprehensive and secure batch processing solution.

Possible disadvantages of AWS Batch

  • Complexity
    Setting up and configuring AWS Batch can be complex for new users unfamiliar with AWS services, requiring a learning curve.
  • Limited to AWS Ecosystem
    AWS Batch is deeply integrated into the AWS ecosystem, which might not be ideal for users looking for a multi-cloud strategy or those using different cloud service providers.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Heavy reliance on AWS Batch can lead to vendor lock-in, making it potentially difficult to migrate workloads to other platforms if needed.
  • Potential for Hidden Costs
    While AWS Batch can be cost-effective, there is the potential for unexpected costs if jobs are not efficiently managed or optimized, especially when scaling up resources.
  • Limited Control Over Infrastructure
    Since AWS Batch manages infrastructure automatically, users have limited control over the underlying compute resources, which may not be suitable for all use cases.

Mikro orm videos

No Mikro orm videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

AWS Batch videos

How AWS Batch Works

More videos:

  • Review - Live from the London Loft | AWS Batch: Simplifying Batch Computing in the Cloud
  • Review - AWS re:Invent 2018: AWS Batch & How AQR leverages AWS to Identify New Investment Signals (CMP372)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Mikro orm and AWS Batch)
Development
77 77%
23% 23
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100
Web Frameworks
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Hosting
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Mikro orm and AWS Batch. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Mikro orm and AWS Batch

Mikro orm Reviews

We have no reviews of Mikro orm yet.
Be the first one to post

AWS Batch Reviews

Python & ETL 2020: A List and Comparison of the Top Python ETL Tools
AWS Batch: This is used for batch computing jobs on AWS resources. It has insane scalability and is well-suited for engineers look to do large compute jobs.
Source: www.xplenty.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Mikro orm should be more popular than AWS Batch. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Mikro orm mentions (26)

  • Show HN: DBOS TypeScript – Lightweight Durable Execution Built on Postgres
    Why typeorm over something like https://mikro-orm.io/? - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Rust GraphQL APIs for NodeJS Developers: Introduction
    In my usual NodeJS tech stack, which includes GraphQL, NestJS, SQL (predominantly PostgreSQL with MikroORM), I encountered these limitations. To overcome them, I've developed a new stack utilizing Rust, which still offers some ease of development:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Top 6 ORMs for Modern Node.js App Development
    Mikro-ORM is a TypeScript ORM that focuses on simplicity and efficiency. It supports various SQL databases and MongoDB. Mikro-ORM is known for its simplicity and developer-friendly APIs. It provides a concise syntax for defining data models and relationships, making it easy to use. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • We migrated to SQL. Our biggest learning? Don't use Prisma
    I found MikroORM [0] to be quite reasonable if you're in the TS ecosystem already. It was also easy to do custom, raw queries, and really just felt like it wasn't in the way. [0] https://mikro-orm.io/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • The Epic Stack by Kent C. Dodds
    It also does code generation into its own module, so good luck with hoisting in a monorepo where you want multiple independent prisma schemas. MikroORM[1] is a much better alternative to Prisma in my opinion but any ORM carries some form of baggage. [1] https://mikro-orm.io/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
View more

AWS Batch mentions (14)

  • Looking for a decent (self hostable) program to orchestrate scripts, notify on failures, etc
    After moving off Jenkins, I moved everything to AWS Batch with Fargate. This works quite well, but it is proving to be a little expensive, as I have to pay for:. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Hosting strategy suggestions
    If you're looking for more control over your infrastructure and want to run a full computing environment, EC2 might be the right choice for you. With EC2, you have complete control over the operating system, network, and storage, which can be useful if you need to install custom software or use specific hardware configurations. Additionally, EC2 + Batch processing provide a wider range of instance types, including... Source: about 2 years ago
  • Questions for bioinformatics researchers that use AWS
    AWS Batch is the equivalent of a university cluster you submit to with slurm/sge/lsf/etc. But does not use those schedulers as AWS has their own. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Scheduling "Fetch & Run" Batch Jobs with AWS Batch and CloudWatch Rules
    Developers frequently use batch computing to access significant amounts of processing power. You may perform batch computing workloads in the AWS Cloud with the aid of AWS Batch, a fully managed service provided by AWS. It is a powerful solution that can plan, schedule, and execute containerized batch or machine learning workloads across the entire spectrum of AWS compute capabilities, including Amazon ECS, Amazon... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • can you run OS applications in lambda layers?
    As others mentioned, you *can*. It might be easier with AWS Batch (https://aws.amazon.com/batch/) depending on what you're trying to do. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Mikro orm and AWS Batch, you can also consider the following products

Hibernate - Hibernate an open source Java persistence framework project.

Fission.io - Fission.io is a serverless framework for Kubernetes that supports many concepts such as event triggers, parallel execution, and statelessness.

Beego - Beego Web is official blog and documentation website for beego app web framework

Nuclio - Nuclio is an open source serverless platform.

Dapper - Dapper is a user-friendly object mapper for the .NET framework.

AWS Lambda - Automatic, event-driven compute service