Microsoft Terminal VS Fig

Microsoft Terminal mentions (13)

• Giving up the iPad-only travel dream

  I suppose the writer will have to wait a few more years before apple 'reinvents' the touch screen and convinces everyone they invented the touchscreen laptop. Notice how just about every other manufacture has a touch screen offering. The same was true for DVD writers back when apple called it the super drive. Many devices on the market came with DVD writers. The ipad pro as great as it is, will not replace a... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago

• Downsides if Emacs in a terminal with Tmux?

  In my case, I use Windows Terminal which is a free and more feature complete terminal program for Windows. I find its support for various ANSI terminal attributes more complete than say something like putty. However, it does have an issue with incorrectly handling C-spc. Source: 11 months ago

• Youtube's enhanced bitrate made regular 1080P suck! Any way to get around it?

  I just use Windows Terminal (Preview version): https://github.com/microsoft/terminal and adjust its settings there. Source: 12 months ago

• Switching from Emacs. My experience

  Either Wezterm OR Window-terminal I Personally use WindowTERM with alacritty * when needed Since WindowTerm has some weird ncurses issues ,. Source: 12 months ago

• Windows 11 in Svelte

  The impression I got from reading through some of the Windows Terminal[0] issues/release notes, is that It's understandable that it's much slower and more challenging to make changes to functionality that's become part of Windows core. If something in PowerToys turns out to be a bad idea, it can be removed. It's much harder to justify that when it's been baked into the OS. [0] - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

Fig mentions (0)