Software Alternatives & Reviews

metro-bootstrap VS Atomize by Quarkly

Compare metro-bootstrap VS Atomize by Quarkly and see what are their differences

metro-bootstrap logo metro-bootstrap

Simple bootstrap from Twitter with Metro style.

Atomize by Quarkly logo Atomize by Quarkly

Library for creating atomic react components
  • metro-bootstrap Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-20
  • Atomize by Quarkly Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-08-05

Our Quarkly project is a mix of a graphic editor (like Figma and Sketch) and website builder (similar to Webflow), complemented by features of traditional IDE. We’ll be sure to elaborate on Quarkly in a separate post, as there is plenty to tell and show, but today we’ll focus on the details of the Atomize tool.

Atomize is the heart of the whole project, as it allows us to solve tasks that would be difficult or even impossible to handle using styled-system and rebass. At the very least, the latter solution is much less elegant.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to metro-bootstrap and Atomize by Quarkly)
Design Tools
19 19%
81% 81
CSS Framework
100 100%
0% 0
Website Builder
0 0%
100% 100
Development Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using metro-bootstrap and Atomize by Quarkly. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing metro-bootstrap and Atomize by Quarkly, you can also consider the following products

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Rebass - React primitive UI components built with Styled System

Metro UI CSS - Metro UI CSS a set of styles to create a site with an interface similar to Windows 8.

Supabase UI - React component library for enterprise dashboards

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

React Rainbow Components - Build your web application in a snap.