Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Mercurial SCM VS JuiceFS

Compare Mercurial SCM VS JuiceFS and see what are their differences

Mercurial SCM logo Mercurial SCM

Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

JuiceFS logo JuiceFS

The Shared POSIX File System for the Cloud
  • Mercurial SCM Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-17
  • JuiceFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-21

Mercurial SCM videos

No Mercurial SCM videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

JuiceFS videos

How To Use JuiceFS To Store Data On DigitalOcean | #programming

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Mercurial SCM and JuiceFS)
Git
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100
Code Collaboration
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Mercurial SCM and JuiceFS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Mercurial SCM and JuiceFS

Mercurial SCM Reviews

We have no reviews of Mercurial SCM yet.
Be the first one to post

JuiceFS Reviews

4 Must-Have Open Source Solutions for Object Storage
JuiceFS solves this by providing a fully POSIX-compatible tool that allows you to work seamlessly with other applications without any business intrusions. Moreover, it can be built on top of almost any cloud storage provider to store data as objects. It also offers better management by saving metadata in familiar database engines, such as Redis, MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, etc.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, JuiceFS should be more popular than Mercurial SCM. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Mercurial SCM mentions (2)

  • Why so rude?
    Many people have asked me to write a blog post on my preference of Mercurial over Git and so far I've refused and will continue doing so for the foreseeable future. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Mercurial Paris Conference will take place on April 05-07 2023 in Paris France. Call for papers are open!
    Mercurial Paris Conference 2023 is a professional and technical conference around mercurial scm, a free, distributed source control management tool. Source: over 1 year ago

JuiceFS mentions (5)

  • Low-Cost Read/Write Separation: Jerry Builds a Primary-Replica ClickHouse Architecture
    To avoid extensive maintenance, we adopted JuiceFS, a distributed file system with high performance. We innovatively use its snapshot feature to implement a primary-replica architecture for ClickHouse. This architecture ensures high availability and stability of the data while significantly enhancing system performance and data recovery capabilities. Over more than a year, it has operated without downtime and... - Source: dev.to / 18 days ago
  • SeaweedFS fast distributed storage system for blobs, objects, files and datalake
    The comments already mention several alternatives (Minio, Ceph, GarageFS). I think another one, not mentioned yet, is JuiceFS [1]. Found one comparison here [2]. [1] https://juicefs.com/en/ [2] https://dzone.com/articles/seaweedfs-vs-juicefs-in-design-and-features. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • An open-source distributed object storage service
    For this use-case, I like JuiceFS better. * https://juicefs.com/en/ * https://github.com/juicedata/juicefs I am not affiliated with them, just a regular user. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Use S3 as NFS for EC2
    EFS would be my first choice for a production service, but since you're experimenting, at a recent hackathon at $work a team got really good results from https://juicefs.com/en/ backed by S3, enough that it warrants further investigation. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Extending NAS to S3 (Compatible Storage)
    Https://juicefs.com/ looks interesting. Object Storage -> POSIX. Source: about 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Mercurial SCM and JuiceFS, you can also consider the following products

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

Seaweed FS - SeaweedFS is a simple and highly scalable distributed file system to store and serve billions of files fast! SeaweedFS object store has O(1) disk seek and SeaweedFS Filer supports cross-cluster replication, POSIX, S3 API, ,…

GitHub Desktop - GitHub Desktop is a seamless way to contribute to projects on GitHub and GitHub Enterprise.

Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.

Atlassian Bitbucket Server - Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.

WekaFS - WekaFS is an extreme-performance parallel filesystem for Linux from WekaIO that works in AWS or on-prem on Industry-Standard Servers. WekaFS includes Enterprise features such as snapshots and tiering to S3 Object Stores.