Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

MediaWiki VS CodeSandbox

Compare MediaWiki VS CodeSandbox and see what are their differences

BoldDesk
Premium Customer Service Software to manage your customer support. Manage support email, publish self-help articles, and automate repetitive tasks. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

MediaWiki logo MediaWiki

MediaWiki is a free software wiki package written in PHP, originally for use on Wikipedia.

CodeSandbox logo CodeSandbox

Online playground for React
  • MediaWiki Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-23
  • CodeSandbox Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-27

MediaWiki

Website
mediawiki.org
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

CodeSandbox

Website
codesandbox.io
Pricing URL
Official CodeSandbox Pricing
$ Details
Release Date
2017 January
Startup details
Country
The Netherlands
State
Noord-Holland
City
Amsterdam
Founder(s)
Bas Buursma
Employees
1 - 9
Edit details

MediaWiki features and specs

  • Open Source
    MediaWiki is free and open-source software, allowing users to modify the source code to fit their specific needs without incurring licensing fees.
  • Scalable
    MediaWiki is designed to handle large-scale projects, making it suitable for enterprise-level documentation as well as large communal knowledge bases like Wikipedia.
  • Version Control
    Each edit in MediaWiki is stored, allowing users to track changes, revert to previous versions, and see the edit history, which is crucial for collaborative environments.
  • Extensive Documentation
    MediaWiki comes with comprehensive documentation, making it easier for developers and users to get started and troubleshoot any issues that arise.
  • Multilingual Support
    MediaWiki supports multiple languages, enabling the creation of content in various languages, useful for global organizations.
  • Extensible
    MediaWiki is highly extensible via plugins and extensions, allowing users to add functionalities tailored to their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of MediaWiki

  • Complex Setup
    Setting up and configuring MediaWiki can be complex and time-consuming, potentially requiring technical expertise.
  • Maintenance
    MediaWiki requires regular maintenance, including updates, backups, and performance tuning, which can be resource-intensive.
  • Learning Curve
    For users not familiar with wikis or MediaWiki syntax, the learning curve can be steep, requiring training or time to become proficient.
  • Performance
    MediaWiki can become resource-intensive as the database grows, potentially requiring robust server resources to maintain performance.
  • Limited Features Out-of-the-Box
    While highly extensible, the core installation of MediaWiki has limited features, requiring additional plugins to add necessary functionalities.
  • Security Vulnerabilities
    As with any widely-used software, MediaWiki may be targeted for security vulnerabilities, necessitating regular updates and security patches.

CodeSandbox features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    CodeSandbox offers an intuitive interface that allows developers to quickly start coding without the need for complex setup or configuration.
  • Instant Collaboration
    The platform supports real-time collaboration, enabling multiple developers to work on the same project simultaneously.
  • Pre-configured Environments
    It provides a variety of pre-configured templates for popular frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular, which saves time on setting up development environments.
  • Integrated Development
    CodeSandbox includes built-in terminal access and npm/yarn package management, making it possible to manage dependencies directly within the editor.
  • Live Previews
    Code changes are instantly compiled and displayed, providing immediate feedback with live previews of the application.
  • GitHub Integration
    Seamless integration with GitHub allows importing and exporting repositories, making it easier to manage version control and workflows.
  • Accessibility
    Being a web-based IDE, CodeSandbox can be accessed from any device with an internet connection, enhancing flexibility and mobility.

Possible disadvantages of CodeSandbox

  • Performance Issues
    Some users experience lag and slower performance, particularly with larger projects, compared to local development environments.
  • Limited Customization
    While convenient, the pre-configured environments might limit advanced customization options available in local IDEs.
  • Dependency on Internet
    As an online platform, a stable internet connection is required to use CodeSandbox effectively, which could be a limitation in areas with poor connectivity.
  • Free Tier Limitations
    The free version comes with certain restrictions on resources and functionality, which might not be sufficient for larger or more complex projects.
  • Security Concerns
    Storing code in an online platform can raise security concerns, especially for sensitive or proprietary projects.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its ease of use, developers new to online IDEs might face a learning curve in adapting from traditional, local development environments.

MediaWiki videos

+ Add

Using A Self Hosted MediaWiki As A Private Documentation Server with Visual Editor

More videos:

  • Review - MediaWiki vs. Confluence

CodeSandbox videos

+ Add

A browser IDE that's actually GOOD? (CodeSandbox.io Review!)

More videos:

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MediaWiki and CodeSandbox)

MediaWiki

CodeSandbox

WiKis
100 100%
WiKis
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
Text Editors
100% 100
Note Taking
100 100%
Note Taking
0% 0
Programming
0 0%
Programming
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using MediaWiki and CodeSandbox. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare MediaWiki and CodeSandbox

MediaWiki Reviews

Top 12 Self-hosted Wiki Engines for 2024: A Comprehensive Guide
Released in 2002, MediaWiki replaced the initial UseModWiki software used by Wikipedia. It evolved with Wikipedia's growth, introducing features like namespaces, watchlists, and user talk pages. It's been adopted by many organizations for their wikis due to its robust and scalable nature.
Source: medevel.com
The 10 Best Self-hosted Wiki Software for Linux System
MediaWiki is an outstanding self-hosted Wiki software for editing rich multimedia and developing collaborative projects. It is based on the Open Source Technology Project (OST), which allows the distribution of software modules. The main difference between MediaWiki and other wiki software is that MediaWiki uses a lightweight wiki markup, which is easier to learn in the...
Source: www.ubuntupit.com
Best 11 Open-source Free Wiki Engines for teams and enterprise in 2022
MediaWiki is an open-source Wiki engine that runs Wikipedia. It is the oldest system in the list and some may consider it the king of Wiki engines. It supports almost all available languages as it is easy to install and use.
Source: medevel.com
The Best 20 Wiki Software For Your Business& Internal Knowledge for 2022
MediaWiki is a free wiki software that runs platforms like Wikipedia and Wiktionary. It helps in collecting and managing knowledge and making it available to your target audience. Customizable and reliable, this wiki tool requires server maintenance and installation. The best part about MediaWiki is that it provides translation services that help you localize the wiki in...
Source: www.proprofskb.com
17 open source wiki engine/software
MediaWiki is a free and open source server based wiki engine written in PHP developed by Wikipedia. MediaWiki is an extremely powerful, scalable software and a feature-rich wiki implementation, that uses PHP to process and display data stored in its MySQL database. Pages use MediaWiki’s wiki-text format, so that users without knowledge of XHTML or CSS can edit pages easily...
Source: gadgetxplore.com

CodeSandbox Reviews

8 Best Replit Alternatives & Competitors in 2022 (Free & Paid) - Software Discover
Codesandbox is an online code editor and prototyping tool that makes creating and sharing web apps faster. Codesandbox: Online code editor and ide for rapid web development.
Source: www.softwarediscover.com
12 Best Online IDE and Code Editors to Develop Web Applications
CodeSandbox can be thought of as a much more powerful and complete take on JSFiddle. True to its name, CodeSandbox provides a complete code editor experience and a sandboxed environment for front-end development.
Source: geekflare.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CodeSandbox seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 310 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

MediaWiki mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of MediaWiki yet. Tracking of MediaWiki recommendations started around Mar 2021.

CodeSandbox mentions (310)

  • How To Install Shadcn UI In React JS
    CodeSandbox Examples: Check out CodeSandbox for live projects using Shadcn UI. It’s a great way to see the toolkit in action. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Thankful for CodeSandbox
    I am thankful for a platform like CodeSandbox because it allows me to offload majority of the processing power and memory resources to the cloud. With a local VS Code installed, I can tunnel in via a remote connection to work on my projects, tinker, or do a deep-dive on certain topics; all while ensuring that the RPi 4 still has sufficient resources left to run other things in the background. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Some useful .new "shortcut" domains
    To create a new React JS environment in CodeSandbox. Similar domains include js.new, vue.new, etc.,. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Sonos CEO Patrick Spence steps down after app update debacle
    I have, it's called Visual Studio Code and I ditched my old native editor(s) for it. I'd even suggest that the fact that it's JS based has significantly changed the tech world because the editor itself will run in a browser so it's here https://godbolt.org/ , and here https://codesandbox.io, and here https://www.postman.com/, and here https://aws.amazon.com/pm/cloud9/ and 100s or 1000s of other sites. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • React Native Online Compiler: Compare the Top 5 Platforms for Your Development Needs
    CodeSandbox for web-first collaborative projects. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MediaWiki and CodeSandbox, you can also consider the following products

DokuWiki - DokuWiki is a simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software that doesn't require a database.

CodePen - A front end web development playground.

TiddlyWiki - a non-linear personal web notebook

replit - Code, create, andlearn together. Use our free, collaborative, in-browser IDE to code in 50+ languages — without spending a second on setup.

Wiki.js - An open source, modern and powerful wiki app built on Node.js, Git, and Markdown.

JSFiddle - Test your JavaScript, CSS, HTML or CoffeeScript online with JSFiddle code editor.

Loading...