Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

MediaWiki VS BitBucket

Compare MediaWiki VS BitBucket and see what are their differences

BoldDesk
Premium Customer Service Software to manage your customer support. Manage support email, publish self-help articles, and automate repetitive tasks. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

MediaWiki logo MediaWiki

MediaWiki is a free software wiki package written in PHP, originally for use on Wikipedia.

BitBucket logo BitBucket

Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.
  • MediaWiki Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-23
  • BitBucket Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-09

MediaWiki features and specs

  • Open Source
    MediaWiki is free and open-source software, allowing users to modify the source code to fit their specific needs without incurring licensing fees.
  • Scalable
    MediaWiki is designed to handle large-scale projects, making it suitable for enterprise-level documentation as well as large communal knowledge bases like Wikipedia.
  • Version Control
    Each edit in MediaWiki is stored, allowing users to track changes, revert to previous versions, and see the edit history, which is crucial for collaborative environments.
  • Extensive Documentation
    MediaWiki comes with comprehensive documentation, making it easier for developers and users to get started and troubleshoot any issues that arise.
  • Multilingual Support
    MediaWiki supports multiple languages, enabling the creation of content in various languages, useful for global organizations.
  • Extensible
    MediaWiki is highly extensible via plugins and extensions, allowing users to add functionalities tailored to their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of MediaWiki

  • Complex Setup
    Setting up and configuring MediaWiki can be complex and time-consuming, potentially requiring technical expertise.
  • Maintenance
    MediaWiki requires regular maintenance, including updates, backups, and performance tuning, which can be resource-intensive.
  • Learning Curve
    For users not familiar with wikis or MediaWiki syntax, the learning curve can be steep, requiring training or time to become proficient.
  • Performance
    MediaWiki can become resource-intensive as the database grows, potentially requiring robust server resources to maintain performance.
  • Limited Features Out-of-the-Box
    While highly extensible, the core installation of MediaWiki has limited features, requiring additional plugins to add necessary functionalities.
  • Security Vulnerabilities
    As with any widely-used software, MediaWiki may be targeted for security vulnerabilities, necessitating regular updates and security patches.

BitBucket features and specs

  • Integration with Atlassian Suite
    BitBucket integrates seamlessly with other Atlassian products like Jira, Confluence, and Trello, enabling end-to-end project management and enhanced collaboration capabilities.
  • Unlimited Private Repositories
    BitBucket offers unlimited private repositories, which is a significant advantage for developers and organizations that prioritize privacy and want to manage multiple projects securely.
  • Built-in CI/CD
    BitBucket Pipelines provides integrated continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) right out of the box, making it easier for teams to automate their workflows and deploy code faster.
  • Cost-Effective
    BitBucket offers competitive pricing plans, including a free tier that supports small teams with essential features, making it accessible for startups and small to medium-sized businesses.
  • Strong Branch Permissions
    BitBucket allows for granular branch permissions, enabling teams to control who can read, write, and merge their code, enhancing security and boosting code quality.

Possible disadvantages of BitBucket

  • User Interface
    Some users find BitBucket's user interface less intuitive compared to competitors like GitHub and GitLab, which can lead to a steeper learning curve for new users.
  • Performance Issues
    There can be occasional performance issues, particularly with larger repositories or heavy traffic, which can slow down the development and deployment processes.
  • Smaller Community
    BitBucket has a smaller user community compared to GitHub, which may result in fewer third-party integrations, plugins, and community-driven support resources.
  • Limited Marketplace
    The BitBucket Marketplace offers fewer integrations and extensions compared to its competitors, which might limit customization options for advanced users or larger teams.
  • Less Popular for Open Source Projects
    BitBucket is less popular for hosting open-source projects compared to platforms like GitHub, which might be a drawback for teams looking to engage with a broader open-source community.

MediaWiki videos

+ Add

Using A Self Hosted MediaWiki As A Private Documentation Server with Visual Editor

More videos:

  • Review - MediaWiki vs. Confluence

BitBucket videos

+ Add

Bitbucket tutorial | How to use Bitbucket Cloud

More videos:

  • Review - Jira & Bitbucket Pull Request and Code Review Part-3 (Last Part)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MediaWiki and BitBucket)

MediaWiki

BitBucket

WiKis
100 100%
WiKis
0% 0
Git
0 0%
Git
100% 100
Note Taking
100 100%
Note Taking
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
Code Collaboration
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using MediaWiki and BitBucket. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare MediaWiki and BitBucket

MediaWiki Reviews

Top 12 Self-hosted Wiki Engines for 2024: A Comprehensive Guide
Released in 2002, MediaWiki replaced the initial UseModWiki software used by Wikipedia. It evolved with Wikipedia's growth, introducing features like namespaces, watchlists, and user talk pages. It's been adopted by many organizations for their wikis due to its robust and scalable nature.
Source: medevel.com
The 10 Best Self-hosted Wiki Software for Linux System
MediaWiki is an outstanding self-hosted Wiki software for editing rich multimedia and developing collaborative projects. It is based on the Open Source Technology Project (OST), which allows the distribution of software modules. The main difference between MediaWiki and other wiki software is that MediaWiki uses a lightweight wiki markup, which is easier to learn in the...
Source: www.ubuntupit.com
Best 11 Open-source Free Wiki Engines for teams and enterprise in 2022
MediaWiki is an open-source Wiki engine that runs Wikipedia. It is the oldest system in the list and some may consider it the king of Wiki engines. It supports almost all available languages as it is easy to install and use.
Source: medevel.com
The Best 20 Wiki Software For Your Business& Internal Knowledge for 2022
MediaWiki is a free wiki software that runs platforms like Wikipedia and Wiktionary. It helps in collecting and managing knowledge and making it available to your target audience. Customizable and reliable, this wiki tool requires server maintenance and installation. The best part about MediaWiki is that it provides translation services that help you localize the wiki in...
Source: www.proprofskb.com
17 open source wiki engine/software
MediaWiki is a free and open source server based wiki engine written in PHP developed by Wikipedia. MediaWiki is an extremely powerful, scalable software and a feature-rich wiki implementation, that uses PHP to process and display data stored in its MySQL database. Pages use MediaWiki’s wiki-text format, so that users without knowledge of XHTML or CSS can edit pages easily...
Source: gadgetxplore.com

BitBucket Reviews

The Top 10 GitHub Alternatives
Bitbucket offers several hosting options, including Cloud, Server, and Data Centre. Each option has its own unique features and benefits. For example, Bitbucket Cloud is hosted on Atlassian’s servers and accessed via a URL. It has an exclusive built-in CI/CD tool, Pipelines, that enables you to build, test, and deploy directly from Bitbucket.
Source: www.wearedevelopers.com
Top 7 GitHub Alternatives You Should Know (2024)
Most of the listed alternatives offer free tier plans for individuals or small teams. Tools like GitLab and Bitbucket allow users to host unlimited repositories without cost.
Source: snappify.com
Best GitHub Alternatives for Developers in 2023
Bitbucket Pipes provides over 50 plug-and-play integrations (code quality, deployment, incident management, etc.) for extended CI/CD workflow automation. Speaking of integrations, Bitbucket integrates seamlessly with other Atlassian programming tools like Opsgenie and Confluence, as well as third-party tools like CircleCI, GitHub and Jenkins.
Source: www.techrepublic.com
Let's Make Sure Github Doesn't Become the only Option
The Pull Request workflow is so dominant now that it’s considered the default path for code to permanently enter into a repository. You can see a similar features in GitHub’s smaller competition Codeberg, GitLab, BitBucket, and Gitea. These competitors don’t offer other, major code collaboration tools, and their Pull Request-like features aren’t just there to help users come...
Source: blog.edwardloveall.com
Free Data Science Tools for Students and Educators in 2020
You can get free unlimited private Git repositories at Bitbucket. If you already have a GitHub Pro, you may wonder why Bitbucket…
Source: towardsdatascience.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BitBucket seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 78 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

MediaWiki mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of MediaWiki yet. Tracking of MediaWiki recommendations started around Mar 2021.

BitBucket mentions (78)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MediaWiki and BitBucket, you can also consider the following products

DokuWiki - DokuWiki is a simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software that doesn't require a database.

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

TiddlyWiki - a non-linear personal web notebook

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

Wiki.js - An open source, modern and powerful wiki app built on Node.js, Git, and Markdown.

Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service

Loading...