Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

MAXQDA VS Condens.io

Compare MAXQDA VS Condens.io and see what are their differences

MAXQDA logo MAXQDA

a professional software for qualitative and mixed methods data analysis

Condens.io logo Condens.io

Make storing, analyzing and sharing all UX research data easier, faster and more enjoyable.
  • MAXQDA Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-13
  • Condens.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-04-23

Analyze qualitative data from user research
  • Note taking and Ai-assisted tagging
  • Automated transcription and video editing
  • Digital whiteboard with affinity clusters, journey maps and more

Share findings online

  • Viewers don't need a Condens account to see findings
  • Hide participant information for data privacy
  • Use short clips and highlight reels as evidence

Build a UX research repository

  • All research insights in one place
  • Separate interface for colleagues to find existing research
  • Full control which data is shared with colleagues

MAXQDA

Website
maxqda.com
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

Condens.io

Website
condens.io
$ Details
paid Free Trial $15.0 / Monthly
Platforms
Browser Web
Release Date
2019 June

MAXQDA features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Condens.io features and specs

  • AI-assisted tagging: Tag notes from user research quickly
  • Media highlights: Create clips from audio and video recordings
  • Affinity clustering: Cluster related evidence to come up with findings
  • Sharing: Make UX research findings accessible online
  • UX research repository: Store past research in a structured manner to find it again easily

MAXQDA videos

Literature Reviews with MAXQDA

More videos:

  • Review - Literature Reviews (Literaturrecherche) mit MAXQDA 2018
  • Review - Qualitative Data Analysis with MAXQDA (Intro Webinar)

Condens.io videos

Condens.io Demo

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MAXQDA and Condens.io)
Market Research
100 100%
0% 0
User Experience
0 0%
100% 100
Text Analytics
100 100%
0% 0
UX
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using MAXQDA and Condens.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare MAXQDA and Condens.io

MAXQDA Reviews

  1. A data analysis tool for business, government, and academic research projects

    The use of QDA software in social science research is so common that many people tend to see QDA software as a tool primarily for social science research. However, applications like MAXQDA are invaluable productivity tools for research analysts in industry or government as well.

    Remarkably scalable, MAXQDA employs a database architecture that can handle research projects ranging in size from several dozen pages to tens of thousands of pages. Many projects today involve identifying connections found among information stored in PDF, Powerpoint presentations, Word documents, photos, videos, and audio recordings. MAXQDA allows users to code relevant sections of each document, identify interrelationships among documents, build relationships among diverse sets of documents and identify thematic trends.

    MAXQDA features a simple 4 pane interface that makes it easy to use. The Document System- is where you place documents (text, images, video, or sound files) you want to analyse. The Document Browser is where you view the content of the document. The Coding System shows the various codes that you create and assign to documents. The Retrieved Segments Pane shows search results.

    🏁 Competitors: ATLAS.ti, NVivo, QDA Miner, HyperResearch, Quirkos

Condens.io Reviews

We have no reviews of Condens.io yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Condens.io seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

MAXQDA mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of MAXQDA yet. Tracking of MAXQDA recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Condens.io mentions (3)

  • Research Repositories - what are you using?
    Https://dovetailapp.com/ and https://condens.io/ (both excellent and specifically focused on user research). Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Research repository tips
    Other options include EnjoyHQ, Aurelius, and Condens. Out of those 3, I tried Condens last year and gave up on it, because the transcription quality was sub-par. When we were considering which tool to use earlier this year, the video montage option and the ability to do the analysis fully from the tool swayed us, and we ended up picking Dovetail. So it really depends on what you want the repository to do, support... Source: over 2 years ago
  • Tools to automate analysis of interview notes?
    Look at Condens. We demo’d it last year. I like it a lot as a tool to aid in synthesis. Didn’t end up going with it because it didn’t meet all of our requirements as a team, but I was still very impressed. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MAXQDA and Condens.io, you can also consider the following products

NVivo - Buy NVivo now for flexible solutions to meet your specific research and data analysis needs. 

Dovetail - Mobile Cloud-Based Dental Software

ATLAS.ti - ATLAS.ti is a powerful workbench for the qualitative analysis of large bodies of textual, graphical, audio and video data. It offers a variety of sophisticated tools for accomplishing the tasks associated with any systematic approach to "soft" data.

EnjoyHQ - A customer research platform for product teams

QualCoder - A very complete Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software (CAQDAS) written in Python. It works with text, images, and multimedia such as audios and videos.

UserBit - A full-stack qualitative research platform for UX & product teams.