Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Materialize CSS VS Amazon S3

Compare Materialize CSS VS Amazon S3 and see what are their differences

Zoviz
Zoviz: Professional Logos, Perfectly Personalized Your Brand. Your Story featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Materialize CSS logo Materialize CSS

A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Amazon S3 logo Amazon S3

Amazon S3 is an object storage where users can store data from their business on a safe, cloud-based platform. Amazon S3 operates in 54 availability zones within 18 graphic regions and 1 local region.
  • Materialize CSS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-14
  • Amazon S3 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-11-01

Amazon S3 (Amazon Simple Storage Service) is the storage platform by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that provides an object storage with high availability, low latency and high durability. S3 can store any type of object and can serve as storage for internet applications, backups, disaster recovery, data archives, big data sets and multimedia.

Materialize CSS features and specs

  • Responsive Design
    Materialize CSS provides a responsive grid system, making it easier to create layouts that work well on various screen sizes and devices.
  • Material Design
    Adheres to Google's Material Design principles, offering a modern and professional look that is consistent across web applications.
  • Component Variety
    Offers a wide range of pre-built components, including forms, buttons, cards, and navigation bars, which helps speed up development.
  • Customization
    Provides options to customize components using Sass, making it flexible for specific design needs.
  • Built-in JavaScript
    Includes built-in JavaScript components like modals, carousels, and tabs, which enhance functionality without requiring additional libraries.

Possible disadvantages of Materialize CSS

  • Learning Curve
    Although it follows Material Design guidelines, there is a learning curve associated with understanding and implementing its various components and classes.
  • File Size
    Including the full library can make your project heavier, affecting load times, especially for users on slower connections.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customizable, deeply customizing or overriding default styles can sometimes be complicated and time-consuming.
  • Dependency on jQuery
    Some components still rely on jQuery, adding to the library size and potentially conflicting with modern JavaScript practices.
  • Community Support
    Compared to larger frameworks like Bootstrap, Materialize CSS has a smaller community, which can result in fewer third-party resources and plugins.

Amazon S3 features and specs

  • Scalability
    Amazon S3 automatically scales storage resources to meet user demands, enabling businesses to store a virtually unlimited amount of data without worrying about capacity constraints.
  • Durability
    Amazon S3 is designed for 99.999999999% (11 9's) durability, ensuring that your data is highly protected against loss and corruption.
  • Security
    Amazon S3 offers robust security features, including encryption at rest and in transit, fine-grained access controls, and integration with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM).
  • Integrations
    Amazon S3 integrates seamlessly with other AWS services such as EC2, Lambda, and RDS, as well as third-party applications, facilitating a cohesive cloud environment.
  • Cost-Effectiveness
    Amazon S3 offers a range of storage classes, allowing users to optimize costs based on their access patterns, from frequently accessed data to long-term archival storage.
  • Global Availability
    Amazon S3 is available in multiple regions worldwide, providing low latency and high availability for users around the globe.

Possible disadvantages of Amazon S3

  • Complexity
    The wide array of features and configurations in Amazon S3 can be overwhelming for beginners, requiring a steep learning curve and careful planning.
  • Cost Predictability
    Although cost-effective, the pricing model of Amazon S3 can be complex due to various factors such as storage volume, data transfer rates, and request frequency, leading to unpredictable costs if not monitored closely.
  • Performance Variation
    While generally offering high performance, the speed of data retrieval from Amazon S3 can vary based on factors like object size, storage class, and region, potentially affecting time-sensitive applications.
  • Limited Migration Tools
    Although Amazon provides data migration services, some users find the migration tools and processes cumbersome, especially when moving large volumes of data from other storage solutions.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Relying heavily on Amazon S3 and other AWS services can make it difficult to switch providers or develop a multi-cloud strategy, leading to potential vendor lock-in concerns.

Materialize CSS videos

+ Add

Build A Travel Agency Theme With Materialize CSS 1.0.0

Amazon S3 videos

+ Add

Introduction to Amazon S3

More videos:

  • Review - Getting Started with Amazon S3 - AWS Online Tech Talks
  • Review - Amazon S3 Review: Amazon S3
  • Review - Amazon S3 Glacier Cloud Storage: What You Need to Know
  • Review - Wasabi vs. Amazon S3

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Materialize CSS and Amazon S3)

Materialize CSS

Amazon S3

Design Tools
100 100%
Design Tools
0% 0
Cloud Hosting
0 0%
Cloud Hosting
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
Cloud Computing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Materialize CSS and Amazon S3. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Materialize CSS and Amazon S3

Materialize CSS Reviews

15 Top Bootstrap Alternatives For Frontend Developers in 2024
Material Design is a design language that combines classic principles of successful design with innovation and technology. One of the downsides of Materialize is that it does not support older versions of web browsers, and sometimes it does not handle certain nestings of components properly, resulting in an odd appearance.
Source: coursesity.com
9 Best Bootstrap Alternatives | Best Frontend Frameworks [2024]
Materialize is a modern responsive front-end framework based on the Material Design principles of Google. Material design is a design language created by Google, which combines traditional design methods with innovations and technology.
Source: hackr.io
Top 10 Best CSS Frameworks for Front-End Developers in 2022
Created by Google in 2014, Materialize is a responsive UI framework for websites and Android apps. It provides many ready-to-use components, classes, and starter templates. It is compatible with Sass and has a responsive layout based on Bootstrap’s 12-column grid format. The best part? Its extensive color palettes. So, if you want to work with Material Design (Google’s...
Source: hackr.io
15 Best CSS Frameworks: Professional Bootstrap and Foundation Alternatives
It’s specifically designed to help you develop faster using a standard template and customizable components. As the name suggests, Materialize is based on the basic principles of Material Design.
Source: www.webdesignerdepot.com
10 of the Best Bootstrap Alternatives
Materialize is a Design-inspired front-end framework that offers everything you need to create beautiful websites and apps. It includes a responsive grid system, CSS components, and animation libraries. Materialize is also easy to use and customizable, making it the perfect choice for any project. Furthermore, a single basic responsive framework across all phases minimizes...
Source: thetechhacker.com

Amazon S3 Reviews

Top 7 Firebase Alternatives for App Development in 2024
Amazon S3 is suitable for applications of any size requiring reliable and scalable storage.
Source: signoz.io
Best Top 12 MEGA Alternatives in 2024
Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) is an object storage service with industry-leading scalability, data availability, security, and performance. The service is particularly suitable for enterprise users to manage collect, store, protect, back-up, retrieve, and analyze data.
Source: www.multcloud.com
7 Best Amazon S3 Alternatives & Competitors in 2024
Amazon S3 is short for Amazon Simple Storage Service, a popular web hosting company among developers that also offers object storage service.
Source: diggitymarketing.com
Top 10 Netlify Alternatives
Amazon S3 is referred to as Amazon Simple Storage Service. It is basically a cloud storage service that was initially released in 2006. This product of Amazon Web Services (AWS) handles big data analytics, provides online data backups and helps in web-scale computing.
Source: blog.back4app.com
What are the alternatives to S3?
Sometimes Amazon S3 might not be serving you as you need and need some features or want to move out of the big 3 providers due to charges of which you’re not using much of their services. There are many alternatives to object storage that you can use at a far lower cost than what you pay on Amazon S3. And storing data traditionally can become complicated sometimes, whereby...
Source: www.w6d.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Amazon S3 should be more popular than Materialize CSS. It has been mentiond 197 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Materialize CSS mentions (26)

  • Top 5 Best CSS Frameworks for Responsive Web Design in 2024
    Materialize is a modern CSS framework based on Google’s Material Design. It was created and designed by Google to provide a unified and consistent user interface across all its products. Materialize is focused on user experience as it integrates animations and components to provide feedback to users. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Front-end Framework: Comparing Bootstrap, Foundation and Materialize
    Materialize was created by a team of developers at Google, inspired by the principles of Material Design. Material Design is a design language developed by Google that emphasizes tactile surfaces, realistic lighting, and bold, graphic interfaces. Materialize aims to bring these principles to web development by providing a framework with ready-to-use components and styles based on Material Design. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Took a web development job without much experience, am I doomed?
    If you wanna make it look nice use materialize css works great with Django templates. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Best 3 Bootstrap Alternatives
    You can also visit the Materialize website and GitHub repository which currently has garnered over 38k likes and has been forked over 4k times by developers. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • All About Hacktober Fest 2022 You Need To Know
    This repository consists of files required to deploy a Web App or PWA created with Materialize Css. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

Amazon S3 mentions (197)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Materialize CSS and Amazon S3, you can also consider the following products

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Google Cloud Storage - Google Cloud Storage offers developers and IT organizations durable and highly available object storage.

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Wasabi Cloud Object Storage - Storage made simple. Faster than Amazon's S3. Less expensive than Glacier.

Foundation - The most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world

AWS Lambda - Automatic, event-driven compute service

Loading...