Software Alternatives & Reviews

Material Design VS Animate.css

Compare Material Design VS Animate.css and see what are their differences

Material Design logo Material Design

Google Material Design

Animate.css logo Animate.css

Animate.css is a cross-browser library of CSS animations.
  • Material Design Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-03
  • Animate.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-06

Material Design videos

YouTube Material Design app review

More videos:

  • Review - Material design
  • Review - Breakdown UI/UX Part I (Google Material Design) | Code Review #3

Animate.css videos

No Animate.css videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Material Design and Animate.css)
Design Tools
42 42%
58% 58
Developer Tools
24 24%
76% 76
Development Tools
100 100%
0% 0
CSS Framework
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Material Design and Animate.css. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Material Design seems to be a lot more popular than Animate.css. While we know about 15 links to Material Design, we've tracked only 1 mention of Animate.css. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Material Design mentions (15)

  • Building a design system with Radix
    Some examples of popular design systems include Google’s Material Design, the Atlassian Design System, and Carbon Design System by IBM. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • How we built a themeable multi-brand design system with Vue.js
    The main reasons organizations decide to build a design system are myriad and well documented. For the team at Monisnap our top priorities were:. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • ELI5 Why are programs so different between Windows and Mac?
    Why are they consistently different across their products? Companies have brand guidelines to make sure that you have a uniform experience with all of their apps. Here's Google's, for example. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Roboto but Make It Flex
    Compare this to the Human Interface Guidelines which have stayed far more stable and neutral. [1]: https://material.io/design/introduction#theming. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • A Googler stumbles through CSS
    - there is too much I would change so here are two resources that should help guide you Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmSjtWTIx1o Https://material.io/design/introduction. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

Animate.css mentions (1)

  • 3 Easy Ways to Add Animation to your Angular Applications
    An advantage of this approach is that it lets us utilize any CSS animation library that works off of the same concept of adding and removing classes. Some of the more popular libraries that work this way are animate.css and magic.css. Chris Coyier has an amazing article on CSS Tricks that lists more of these if you are interested. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Material Design and Animate.css, you can also consider the following products

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Material UI - A CSS Framework and a Set of React Components that Implement Google's Material Design

Angular Material - Angular Material is both a UI Component framework and a reference implementation of Google's Material Design Specification.

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library

PrimeFaces - Open source UI framework for JSF featuring over 100 components, touch optimized mobilekit, push framework, client side validation, theme engine and more.

Animista - Create beautiful CSS animations in your browser