Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Marko Widgets VS Inferno

Compare Marko Widgets VS Inferno and see what are their differences

Marko Widgets logo Marko Widgets

Marko Widgets extends the Marko templating engine to provide a simple and efficient mechanism for binding behavior to UI components rendered on either the server or in the browser.

Inferno logo Inferno

An extremely fast React-like javascript library for building modern user interfaces.
  • Marko Widgets Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19
  • Inferno Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-11

Marko Widgets features and specs

  • Component-Based Architecture
    Marko Widgets offers a component-based architecture which promotes reusability and modularity, making it easier to maintain and scale applications.
  • State Management
    Supports state management at the component level, which helps in managing the UI state efficiently without requiring additional libraries.
  • Server-Side Rendering (SSR)
    Marko Widgets provides built-in support for server-side rendering, which improves performance and SEO by rendering content on the server before sending it to the client.
  • Incremental DOM Updates
    Uses an incremental DOM approach, which optimizes updates by only modifying parts of the DOM that change, improving performance.

Possible disadvantages of Marko Widgets

  • Limited Community and Ecosystem
    Compared to more popular frameworks like React or Vue, Marko Widgets has a smaller community and fewer third-party libraries or tools available.
  • Archived Status
    The repository is archived, indicating that there will likely be no further updates or maintenance, which can be a concern for the longevity and security of projects.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers familiar with more popular frameworks might face a steeper learning curve due to its unique syntax and concepts.
  • Lack of Modern Features
    Since the project is archived, it might lack modern features and improvements found in other actively maintained UI libraries and frameworks.

Inferno features and specs

  • High Performance
    Inferno is known for its impressive speed and performance, often comparable to or surpassing many other front-end frameworks and libraries, making it suitable for high-performance applications.
  • React-Like API
    Inferno uses a similar API to React, which makes it easier for developers who are already familiar with React to transition to or integrate Inferno.
  • Compatibility
    Due to its React-like API, Inferno can work with many existing React components and libraries, enhancing its versatility and integration capabilities.
  • Small Size
    Inferno has a small footprint, reducing load times and improving overall application performance, especially on mobile devices and slower networks.
  • Server-Side Rendering
    Inferno supports server-side rendering out of the box, allowing for faster initial page loads and better SEO.

Possible disadvantages of Inferno

  • Smaller Community
    Inferno has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to more widely used libraries and frameworks like React, potentially leading to fewer resources, plugins, and support.
  • Limited Third-Party Libraries
    While compatibility with React libraries is a strength, there are still fewer third-party libraries specifically designed for Inferno, which can limit development options in some scenarios.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers who are not familiar with React, there can be a learning curve associated with understanding the Inferno API and concepts.
  • Infrequent Updates
    Compared to larger projects like React, Inferno may have less frequent updates and new feature releases, which can impact the adoption of the latest web development trends.
  • Less Market Demand
    There is currently less market demand for developers proficient in Inferno compared to those skilled in more popular frameworks and libraries, potentially affecting job prospects and opportunities.

Analysis of Inferno

Overall verdict

  • Inferno is considered a good option for developers who prioritize performance and need a library that offers React-like features with potentially enhanced speed. Its active community, clear documentation, and ease of use contribute to its positive reception.

Why this product is good

  • Inferno is a modern JavaScript library specifically designed for building high-performance user interfaces. It is well-regarded for its lightweight size, fast rendering speed, and compatibility with React, making it a suitable choice for applications that require high performance and efficiency.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking for a faster alternative to React
  • Projects with performance-critical requirements
  • Teams with existing React knowledge seeking a complementary or alternative library
  • Applications targeting environments with limited resources

Marko Widgets videos

No Marko Widgets videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Inferno videos

Inferno - Movie Review

More videos:

  • Review - Inferno - Movie Review
  • Review - Inferno - Official Movie Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Marko Widgets and Inferno)
Javascript UI Libraries
13 13%
87% 87
JavaScript Framework
14 14%
86% 86
Frontend Development
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Marko Widgets and Inferno. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Marko Widgets and Inferno

Marko Widgets Reviews

We have no reviews of Marko Widgets yet.
Be the first one to post

Inferno Reviews

The Best JavaScript Frameworks You’re Not Using
There isn’t an overall number we can use to gauge performance on the chart above, but smaller numbers are better. Obviously, Inferno performs very well again. If you’re a React developer and have a project that requires excellent performance, Inferno is definitely something you should consider. We’ll finish with this from the Inferno “About” page:
Source: jsreport.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Inferno seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Marko Widgets mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Marko Widgets yet. Tracking of Marko Widgets recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Inferno mentions (2)

  • Solid vs React - the Fastest VS the Most Popular UI Library
    Some might argue that React’s relatively poor performance (it’s still plenty-fast for many apps) is due to Virtual DOM and prioritization of development experience, i.e., clarity over complexity. To counter the first argument - there’s React-like Inferno. For the second one - there’s Solid. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • A Look at Compilation in JavaScript Frameworks
    A VDOM library like Inferno uses this information to compile its JSX directly into pre-optimized node structures. Marko, and Vue hoist their static VDOM nodes outside of their components so that they don't incur the overhead of recreating them on every render. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Marko Widgets and Inferno, you can also consider the following products

Deku - Functional view library for building UI components as an alternative to React

Preact.js - Preact is a fast 3kB alternative to React with the same modern API. Components & Virtual DOM.

Webix UI - An enterprise JavaScript Library for cross-platform app development with HTML5 JavaScript widgets and easy integration with most popular JavaScript Frameworks.

Svelte - Cybernetically enhanced web apps

Riot.js - Riot allows teams to communicate across a wide range of collaboration apps.

Vue.js - Reactive Components for Modern Web Interfaces