Riot.js VS Inferno

Compare Riot.js VS Inferno and see what are their differences

Flagsmith

Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Riot.js

Riot allows teams to communicate across a wide range of collaboration apps.

Inferno

An extremely fast React-like javascript library for building modern user interfaces.

Landing page //
2023-01-20

Landing page //
2023-05-11

Riot.js

Website: riotjs.com
$ Details: -

Edit details

Inferno

Website: infernojs.org
$ Details

Edit details

Riot.js features and specs

Simplicity
Riot.js is known for its minimalistic approach, which makes it easy to learn and use. Its API is straightforward, and it focuses on providing only what is necessary for building UI components.
Small File Size
Being lightweight, Riot.js offers fast loading times. Its small footprint makes it ideal for projects where performance and speed are crucial.
Custom Tags
Riot.js allows developers to create custom HTML tags, encapsulating HTML, CSS, and JavaScript logic in a single file. This leads to more organized and maintainable code.
Reactive Binding
Riot.js provides a reactive data binding feature that automatically updates the UI when the underlying data changes, ensuring that the UI is always in sync with the application state.
Compatibility
Riot.js can be integrated easily with other libraries and frameworks, giving developers the flexibility to use it alongside existing tools.

Possible disadvantages of Riot.js

Smaller Ecosystem
Compared to larger frameworks like React or Angular, Riot.js has a smaller community and ecosystem, which may result in fewer third-party libraries, plugins, and tools available.
Less Popular
Riot.js is less popular compared to major frameworks, which might result in less community support and fewer resources such as tutorials, courses, and documentation.
Limited Advanced Features
While Riot.js provides core features needed for UI development, it may lack some of the more advanced features and utilities present in larger frameworks, which might be required for complex applications.
Learning Curve for Unique Syntax
Despite its simplicity, Riot.js has its own syntax and conventions that might require developers to go through a learning curve, especially if they're accustomed to more popular frameworks.
Potential Integration Challenges
While generally compatible, integrating Riot.js with certain complex projects or specific technology stacks could present challenges, especially where specific integrations or optimizations are required.

Inferno features and specs

High Performance
Inferno is known for its impressive speed and performance, often comparable to or surpassing many other front-end frameworks and libraries, making it suitable for high-performance applications.
React-Like API
Inferno uses a similar API to React, which makes it easier for developers who are already familiar with React to transition to or integrate Inferno.
Compatibility
Due to its React-like API, Inferno can work with many existing React components and libraries, enhancing its versatility and integration capabilities.
Small Size
Inferno has a small footprint, reducing load times and improving overall application performance, especially on mobile devices and slower networks.
Server-Side Rendering
Inferno supports server-side rendering out of the box, allowing for faster initial page loads and better SEO.

Possible disadvantages of Inferno

Smaller Community
Inferno has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to more widely used libraries and frameworks like React, potentially leading to fewer resources, plugins, and support.
Limited Third-Party Libraries
While compatibility with React libraries is a strength, there are still fewer third-party libraries specifically designed for Inferno, which can limit development options in some scenarios.
Learning Curve
For developers who are not familiar with React, there can be a learning curve associated with understanding the Inferno API and concepts.
Infrequent Updates
Compared to larger projects like React, Inferno may have less frequent updates and new feature releases, which can impact the adoption of the latest web development trends.
Less Market Demand
There is currently less market demand for developers proficient in Inferno compared to those skilled in more popular frameworks and libraries, potentially affecting job prospects and opportunities.

Analysis of Inferno

Overall verdict

Inferno is considered a good option for developers who prioritize performance and need a library that offers React-like features with potentially enhanced speed. Its active community, clear documentation, and ease of use contribute to its positive reception.

Why this product is good

Inferno is a modern JavaScript library specifically designed for building high-performance user interfaces. It is well-regarded for its lightweight size, fast rendering speed, and compatibility with React, making it a suitable choice for applications that require high performance and efficiency.

Recommended for

Developers looking for a faster alternative to React
Projects with performance-critical requirements
Teams with existing React knowledge seeking a complementary or alternative library
Applications targeting environments with limited resources

Riot.js videos

+ Add

Master Riot: Learn Riot.js from Scratch : Why Riot?

Inferno videos

+ Add

Inferno - Movie Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Riot.js and Inferno)

Riot.js

Inferno

Javascript UI Libraries

20 20%

Javascript UI Libraries

80% 80

JavaScript Framework

20 20%

JavaScript Framework

80% 80

Frontend Development

100 100%

Frontend Development

0% 0

Development

0 0%

Development

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Riot.js and Inferno. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Riot.js and Inferno

Riot.js Reviews

Comparing Vue.js to new JavaScript frameworks

Instead of the MVVM pattern that Vue uses, Riot uses the Model-View-Presenter (MVP) pattern. The model and the view work similarly to Vue’s model and view, but, in place of the view model layer, Riot uses a presenter layer to transfer data from the model to the view and vice versa.

Source: blog.logrocket.com

Inferno Reviews

The Best JavaScript Frameworks You’re Not Using

There isn’t an overall number we can use to gauge performance on the chart above, but smaller numbers are better. Obviously, Inferno performs very well again. If you’re a React developer and have a project that requires excellent performance, Inferno is definitely something you should consider. We’ll finish with this from the Inferno “About” page:

Source: jsreport.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Inferno seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Riot.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Riot.js yet. Tracking of Riot.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Inferno mentions (2)

Solid vs React - the Fastest VS the Most Popular UI Library
Some might argue that React’s relatively poor performance (it’s still plenty-fast for many apps) is due to Virtual DOM and prioritization of development experience, i.e., clarity over complexity. To counter the first argument - there’s React-like Inferno. For the second one - there’s Solid. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
A Look at Compilation in JavaScript Frameworks
A VDOM library like Inferno uses this information to compile its JSX directly into pre-optimized node structures. Marko, and Vue hoist their static VDOM nodes outside of their components so that they don't incur the overhead of recreating them on every render. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Riot.js and Inferno, you can also consider the following products

Vue.js - Reactive Components for Modern Web Interfaces

Preact.js - Preact is a fast 3kB alternative to React with the same modern API. Components & Virtual DOM.

Webix UI - An enterprise JavaScript Library for cross-platform app development with HTML5 JavaScript widgets and easy integration with most popular JavaScript Frameworks.

Svelte - Cybernetically enhanced web apps

Polymer - Polymer is a library that uses the latest web technologies to let you create custom HTML elements.

Deku - Functional view library for building UI components as an alternative to React