Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Marked.js VS GNU Make

Compare Marked.js VS GNU Make and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Marked.js logo Marked.js

A full-featured markdown parser and compiler, written in JavaScript. Built for speed.

GNU Make logo GNU Make

GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.
  • Marked.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-23
  • GNU Make Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-12

Marked.js features and specs

  • Performance
    Marked.js is known for its speed, being able to compile Markdown to HTML faster than many other libraries due to its efficient parsing and rendering processes.
  • Customization
    Marked.js allows extensive customization. You can modify its default behavior through options and use an event-driven architecture to integrate custom logic during parsing.
  • GitHub Flavored Markdown
    Marked.js supports GitHub Flavored Markdown (GFM), which is a very popular dialect of Markdown that includes features like tables, strikethrough, and task lists.
  • Extensibility
    Users can extend Marked.js with plugins to add additional features or modify existing functionality, offering flexibility for developers.

Possible disadvantages of Marked.js

  • Complexity
    Though customizable, Marked.js can be a bit complex for beginners to use effectively, especially when it involves deep customizations or handling edge cases.
  • Security
    Like many Markdown parsers, Marked.js does not sanitize input by default. This means developers must manually sanitize input to prevent XSS vulnerabilities.
  • Bundle Size
    While performant, Marked.js may be larger in size compared to some lightweight Markdown parsers, which could be a consideration for performance-sensitive applications.
  • Learning Curve
    The library can have a steep learning curve for new users, especially for those who are not familiar with Markdown parser internals or Node.js environments.

GNU Make features and specs

  • Portability
    GNU Make is highly portable and can be used across various Unix-like operating systems as well as on Windows.
  • Dependency Management
    It efficiently handles complex dependencies between various parts of the software, ensuring that changes are propagated properly.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source software, GNU Make is freely available and can be modified according to user needs.
  • Wide Adoption
    It is widely adopted in the industry, which means that there is extensive documentation and a large community for support.
  • Efficiency
    GNU Make speeds up the build process by only recompiling the necessary parts of the codebase.

Possible disadvantages of GNU Make

  • Complex Syntax
    The syntax of GNU Makefiles can become very complex, especially for large projects, making them hard to read and maintain.
  • Limited Cross-Platform Scripting
    While the tool itself is cross-platform, Makefiles can sometimes include shell commands that are not portable.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Beginners may find it challenging to grasp the concepts and syntax of GNU Make, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Debugging Difficulty
    Debugging Makefiles can be difficult, with limited tools available to trace or step through the make process.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    For extremely large projects, performance can become an issue, as the evaluation of dependencies might become slow.

Analysis of GNU Make

Overall verdict

  • Yes, GNU Make is a robust and reliable tool for managing build processes. Its long-established reputation and widespread use in both open-source and commercial projects underline its effectiveness and flexibility.

Why this product is good

  • GNU Make is widely used because it automates the build process, efficiently handling dependencies and detecting minimal sets of changes in source files. It is highly customizable, supports non-recursive builds, and integrates well into various development environments.

Recommended for

  • Software developers working on C/C++ projects
  • Teams looking to automate build processes
  • Projects that require cross-platform build capabilities
  • Developers who prefer command-line tools
  • Open-source project maintainers

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Marked.js and GNU Make)
Competitive Intelligence
100 100%
0% 0
Front End Package Manager
SEO
100 100%
0% 0
JS Build Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Marked.js and GNU Make. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Marked.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 17 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Marked.js mentions (17)

View more

GNU Make mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of GNU Make yet. Tracking of GNU Make recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Marked.js and GNU Make, you can also consider the following products

Snarkdown - The super fast, 1kb Markdown parser in JavaScript

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Markdown-it - High-speed Markdown parser with 100% CommonMark support, extensions & syntax plugins.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

ShowdownJS - A Markdown to HTML converter written in JavaScript

SBT - SBT is a build tool for Scala, like Ant or Maven but with hieroglyphics.