Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

SCons VS Marked.js

Compare SCons VS Marked.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

SCons logo SCons

SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Marked.js logo Marked.js

A full-featured markdown parser and compiler, written in JavaScript. Built for speed.
  • SCons Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-21
  • Marked.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-23

SCons features and specs

  • Python Integration
    SCons uses Python scripts for build configuration, which allows users to leverage the full power of Python’s capabilities, including libraries and modules, for more complex build scenarios.
  • Automatic Dependency Tracking
    SCons automatically tracks dependencies, ensuring that only the necessary parts of the project are rebuilt. This can lead to faster incremental builds and improved efficiency.
  • Cross-Platform
    SCons is cross-platform and works on various operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS, providing a consistent build environment across different platforms.
  • Wide Range of Tools
    SCons supports a wide range of tools and compilers out-of-the-box, making it easier to configure build environments for different programming languages and technologies.
  • Extensibility
    The use of Python makes SCons highly extensible. Users can write custom build targets, scanners, and actions to suit specific project needs.

Possible disadvantages of SCons

  • Performance
    SCons can be slower than other build systems, especially for larger projects, due to the overhead of Python and its dependency scanning mechanisms.
  • Complexity
    While Python scripting offers flexibility, it can also add complexity to the build system, especially for users who are not familiar with Python programming.
  • Learning Curve
    Users new to SCons may face a steep learning curve, due to the need to understand both the build system itself and Python if they are not already familiar with it.
  • Limited IDE Integration
    SCons has limited integration with some popular IDEs compared to other build systems like CMake, which can affect the development experience for some users.
  • Smaller Community
    SCons has a smaller user base and community compared to more widely adopted build systems like CMake, which can result in fewer readily available resources, tutorials, and community support.

Marked.js features and specs

  • Performance
    Marked.js is known for its speed, being able to compile Markdown to HTML faster than many other libraries due to its efficient parsing and rendering processes.
  • Customization
    Marked.js allows extensive customization. You can modify its default behavior through options and use an event-driven architecture to integrate custom logic during parsing.
  • GitHub Flavored Markdown
    Marked.js supports GitHub Flavored Markdown (GFM), which is a very popular dialect of Markdown that includes features like tables, strikethrough, and task lists.
  • Extensibility
    Users can extend Marked.js with plugins to add additional features or modify existing functionality, offering flexibility for developers.

Possible disadvantages of Marked.js

  • Complexity
    Though customizable, Marked.js can be a bit complex for beginners to use effectively, especially when it involves deep customizations or handling edge cases.
  • Security
    Like many Markdown parsers, Marked.js does not sanitize input by default. This means developers must manually sanitize input to prevent XSS vulnerabilities.
  • Bundle Size
    While performant, Marked.js may be larger in size compared to some lightweight Markdown parsers, which could be a consideration for performance-sensitive applications.
  • Learning Curve
    The library can have a steep learning curve for new users, especially for those who are not familiar with Markdown parser internals or Node.js environments.

Analysis of SCons

Overall verdict

  • SCons is a good choice for those looking for a robust and flexible build automation tool, especially if they are comfortable with Python. It allows for a more streamlined and manageable build process, particularly for complex and multi-language projects.

Why this product is good

  • SCons is a software construction tool that is used for automating the build process. It is recognized for its ability to handle complex build requirements through a Python-based configuration language. This allows for greater flexibility and power compared to traditional make-based systems. SCons automatically handles dependencies, has a built-in cache system for faster builds, and is cross-platform, making it suitable for both small and large projects.

Recommended for

  • Software developers and engineers who need a flexible and powerful build system
  • Teams working with multi-language and complex codebases
  • Projects that require cross-platform support
  • Developers familiar with or interested in using Python for build configurations

SCons videos

Review Scons Bañados Dia %

Marked.js videos

No Marked.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to SCons and Marked.js)
Front End Package Manager
Competitive Intelligence
0 0%
100% 100
JS Build Tools
100 100%
0% 0
SEO
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using SCons and Marked.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Marked.js might be a bit more popular than SCons. We know about 17 links to it since March 2021 and only 16 links to SCons. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

SCons mentions (16)

  • Modern CMake
    Scons is very easy and readable yet very powerful. It is Python based and extensible. https://scons.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Tired of Makefiles
    Has anyone tried SCONS? Came across someone using it in a place where I worked earlier. Python-based make-like tool. https://scons.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Show HN: Jeeves – A Pythonic Alternative to GNU Make
    The most comprehensive make alternative in python I've seen is Scons (https://scons.org/) It would be worth to see how they tackles some of the challenges you're looking into. Blurb from the website: SCons is an Open Source software construction tool. Think of SCons as an improved, cross-platform substitute for the classic Make utility with integrated functionality similar to autoconf/automake and compiler caches... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Taskfile: A Modern Alternative to Makefile
    Https://scons.org/ It has cache facility to speed up re-builds. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • What was used to build C++ programs before Cmake?
    SCons never got popular enough to escape the niches it grew up in. Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

Marked.js mentions (17)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing SCons and Marked.js, you can also consider the following products

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Markdown-it - High-speed Markdown parser with 100% CommonMark support, extensions & syntax plugins.

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Snarkdown - The super fast, 1kb Markdown parser in JavaScript

Ninja Build - Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

ShowdownJS - A Markdown to HTML converter written in JavaScript