Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Mantine VS react-testing-library

Compare Mantine VS react-testing-library and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Mantine logo Mantine

React library, 60+ hooks and components with dark theme support and focus on accessibility

react-testing-library logo react-testing-library

[`React Testing Library`][gh] builds on top of `DOM Testing Library` by adding
  • Mantine Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-27
  • react-testing-library Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-21

Mantine features and specs

  • Component Library
    Mantine offers a comprehensive set of React components that are ready to use, which speeds up development and ensures consistency in design.
  • Customizability
    Mantine components are highly customizable, allowing developers to fine-tune their UI according to their needs and preferences.
  • Themable
    The theming system in Mantine is robust, enabling developers to easily implement both light and dark modes and to create custom themes.
  • TypeScript Support
    Mantine has built-in TypeScript support, providing type safety and autocompletion benefits for developers who use TypeScript.
  • Performance
    Mantine is designed with performance in mind, ensuring that components render quickly and efficiently, which is crucial for creating responsive UIs.
  • Rich Documentation
    Mantine comes with extensive documentation, which includes usage examples, API details, and guidelines, making it easier for developers to get started and solve issues.

Possible disadvantages of Mantine

  • Learning Curve
    Despite its rich documentation, there is a learning curve associated with Mantine, especially for developers who are new to the library or to component-based design in general.
  • Bundle Size
    Mantine's comprehensive features can lead to a larger bundle size compared to some lighter-weight UI libraries, which may affect performance in resource-constrained environments.
  • Community Support
    As a relatively newer library compared to giants like Material-UI or Ant Design, Mantine has a smaller community, which might limit the availability of third-party tutorials and plugins.
  • Dependency
    Relying on a third-party UI library like Mantine can lead to dependencies on its updates and bug fixes, which may not align with the project’s timelines.

react-testing-library features and specs

  • Focused on user-centric testing
    React Testing Library encourages tests that closely resemble how users interact with an application. This approach makes tests more reliable and meaningful.
  • Reduces coupling to implementation details
    By encouraging developers to interact with components via the DOM, the library minimizes dependencies on component internals, making tests less prone to breaking from refactors.
  • Improved test readability
    Tests written with React Testing Library are generally easier to read and understand because they focus on what the user sees and does, rather than the internal logic of the components.
  • Comprehensive query options
    The library provides a wide range of query methods (e.g., getByText, getByRole), which makes it easy to select elements in ways that resemble how users think.
  • Active community and well-maintained
    React Testing Library has a strong, active community and it's maintained by experienced developers who keep the library up-to-date with React's evolution.

Possible disadvantages of react-testing-library

  • Limited support for non-DOM testing
    The library is heavily focused on DOM interactions, making it less suited for testing non-DOM logic or scenarios that don't involve user interactions.
  • Can be slower
    Tests that involve the DOM can be slower compared to tests that interact directly with component methods and state, which can lead to longer test execution times.
  • Learning curve for traditional testers
    Developers who are used to testing implementation details with other tools (like Enzyme) might find it challenging to adjust to the user-centric approach advocated by React Testing Library.
  • Potential for less granular control
    Because the library encourages testing through the UI, developers might find it harder to test specific, isolated internal behaviors of components that aren't directly visible to users.
  • Dependencies on browser APIs
    The library's reliance on browser APIs means that tests may behave differently in different environments or may require polyfills for certain features, leading to potential inconsistencies.

Analysis of react-testing-library

Overall verdict

  • React Testing Library is highly regarded in the React community for its simplicity and effective approach to testing React components. It’s known for promoting good testing practices that result in reliable and maintainable code.

Why this product is good

  • React Testing Library is considered good because it encourages testing practices that closely resemble how users interact with the application. It emphasizes testing components from the user's perspective and discourages testing implementation details, which can lead to more robust and maintainable tests.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking to improve the reliability of their React applications
  • Teams interested in adopting user-centric testing methodologies
  • Projects that prioritize maintainable and understandable test code

Mantine videos

No Mantine videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

react-testing-library videos

React unit testing with Jest & React-testing-library

More videos:

  • Review - Test a React Component that renders a list with react-testing-library

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Mantine and react-testing-library)
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
49 49%
51% 51
Automated Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Open Source
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Mantine and react-testing-library. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Mantine and react-testing-library

Mantine Reviews

10 Best Free React UI Libraries in 2023
Mantine is a free and open-source React components library that provides 134 fully responsive React components for 25 different categories like navbar, error pages, blog card, comments, sliders, etc. to be put into production.
React UI Components Libraries: Our Top Picks for 2023
Mantine has a Discord community that you can join to ask questions, view the recent developments, and participate in feature discussions. It’s also available on GitHub for discussions and sharing feedback. You can also follow Mantine on Twitter to stay notified of updates.
Source: kinsta.com

react-testing-library Reviews

We have no reviews of react-testing-library yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

react-testing-library might be a bit more popular than Mantine. We know about 133 links to it since March 2021 and only 130 links to Mantine. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Mantine mentions (130)

View more

react-testing-library mentions (133)

  • Migrating from AngularJS to React
    Additionally, I wrote Jest and Enzyme unit tests to demonstrate how to go about unit testing the components, as test driven development (TDD) is another methodology my organization subscribes to. Jest is a unit testing framework that actually shipped with React if you use the Create React App CLI to make a new React project. And at the time, Enzyme was created by Airbnb and added additional functionality to Jest... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • How To Convert HTML CSS JS To React JS
    After converting your components, take some time to test your application. Make sure everything is working as expected. React’s development server automatically reloads your application whenever you save changes, which makes testing a lot easier. Tools like Jest and React Testing Library are also available to help you write tests for your components. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • How To Write Unit Test Cases In React JS
    React Testing Library: For testing React components from a user’s point of view, visit the React Testing Library documentation. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Top 20 Modern React Libraries To Supercharge Your Next Big Project
    Resource: React Testing Library Documentation. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Next.js Testing Guide: Unit and E2E Tests with Vitest & Playwright
    In this article, you will write unit tests in Next.js client components and synchronous server components using Vitest and React Testing Library, and you will write end-to-end tests for your async server components using Playwright. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Mantine and react-testing-library, you can also consider the following products

Chakra UI - Simple, modular and accessible UI components for your React applications.

Jest - Jest is a delightful JavaScript Testing Framework with a focus on simplicity.

Ant Design - An enterprise-class UI design language and React implementation with a set of high-quality React components, one of best React UI library for enterprises

Storybook - Storybook is an open source tool for developing UI components in isolation for React, Vue, and Angular. It makes building stunning UIs organized and efficient.

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Enzyme - Enzyme is a JavaScript testing utility for React.