Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Manjaro VS NetBSD

Compare Manjaro VS NetBSD and see what are their differences

Manjaro logo Manjaro

Manjaro Linux is a linux distribution which is based on arch linux. It uses the PACMAN package manager.

NetBSD logo NetBSD

PowerPC, Alpha, SPARC, MIPS, SH3, ARM, amd64, i386, m68k, VAX: Of course it runs NetBSD.
  • Manjaro Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-17

Manjaro OS for everyone manjaro has no adverts, licenses or fees, it respects user privacy and empowers them with full control over their hardware. It can be used for development, gaming, 3D, office or home, it can be installed on tablets, mobile, desktops, laptops and boards.

  • NetBSD Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-03

Manjaro features and specs

  • Easy Installation
    Manjaro provides a user-friendly installer that simplifies the installation process, making it accessible for beginners.
  • Rolling Release
    As a rolling release distribution, Manjaro continually updates its software, ensuring users have access to the latest features and security updates.
  • AUR Support
    Manjaro allows access to the Arch User Repository (AUR), giving users a vast selection of community-maintained packages.
  • Excellent Hardware Support
    Manjaro is known for its strong hardware detection and compatibility, making it suitable for various systems, including newer hardware.
  • Pre-configured Desktop Environments
    Manjaro provides several pre-configured desktop environments (e.g., Xfce, KDE, GNOME), offering users an optimized and polished experience out-of-the-box.
  • User-Friendly
    With built-in utilities and an intuitive design, Manjaro is aimed at being user-friendly, especially compared to the more complex Arch Linux.
  • Active Community
    Manjaro has an active and supportive community, which contributes to a wealth of documentation, forums, and resources for troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of Manjaro

  • Possible Stability Issues
    As a rolling release, new updates may introduce bugs or instability. Users might occasionally face issues that could disrupt their workflow.
  • Less Control Compared to Arch
    While Manjaro simplifies many aspects of setup and use, this might decrease the level of control some users have compared to a vanilla Arch Linux installation.
  • AUR Safety
    While the AUR provides access to many packages, it also carries some risks as these packages are user-contributed and might not be as thoroughly vetted.
  • Large Package Sizes
    Manjaro pre-configures many packages and tools, which can lead to larger downloads and installations compared to other distributions.
  • Learning Curve
    Even though Manjaro aims to be user-friendly, it still requires a learning curve, particularly for users new to Linux or coming from other operating systems.
  • Not as Established as Other Distros
    While growing in popularity, Manjaro does not have the long-standing reputation of other major distributions like Ubuntu or Fedora, which can be a consideration for some users.

NetBSD features and specs

  • Portability
    NetBSD is known for its high portability across different hardware platforms. It supports a wide range of architectures, making it a versatile choice for various types of systems.
  • Clean Design
    The operating system is praised for its clean and well-documented codebase, which makes it easier to understand, maintain, and contribute to the development.
  • Security
    NetBSD places a strong emphasis on security, implementing robust security features and frequent updates to maintain a secure environment.
  • Lightweight
    It is designed to be lightweight and efficient, which is beneficial for systems with limited resources, such as embedded devices.
  • Advanced Networking
    NetBSD provides advanced networking capabilities, making it suitable for use in network appliances and services.

Possible disadvantages of NetBSD

  • Smaller Community
    Compared to other open-source operating systems like Linux, NetBSD has a smaller community, which can result in less frequent updates and fewer available resources or support.
  • Less Software
    NetBSD may have fewer pre-compiled packages and software options available in its repositories compared to more popular operating systems.
  • Learning Curve
    For users not familiar with BSD systems, there might be a steeper learning curve due to differences in system management and command-line interfaces.
  • Limited Commercial Support
    There are fewer commercial support options available for NetBSD, which may be a limitation for businesses requiring extensive professional support.
  • Desktop Environment
    NetBSD is not traditionally focused on providing a user-friendly desktop environment, which might limit its appeal to casual desktop users.

Manjaro videos

Manjaro 21.0 Ornara | KDE Plasma

More videos:

  • Review - Manjaro 21.0 Ornara | XFCE
  • Review - Manjaro 20.2 Nibia | GNOME At Its Finest
  • Review - Ubuntu 22.04 LTS VS Manjaro – What are the differences ! Which One is Better in 2022 ?
  • Review - Manjaro Makes Desktop Linux Look GOOD!
  • Review - MANJARO has a BIG PROBLEM

NetBSD videos

A FreeBSD User Tries Out....NetBSD 8.0

More videos:

  • Review - Comparision Video - NetBSD & OpenBSD
  • Tutorial - How to install NetBSD 9.0 plus the Xfce desktop

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Manjaro and NetBSD)
Operating Systems
96 96%
4% 4
Linux
95 95%
5% 5
Linux Distribution
96 96%
4% 4
Distributions
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Manjaro and NetBSD. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Manjaro and NetBSD

Manjaro Reviews

10 Most Popular Linux Distros of the Year 2023
If I have to choose between Manjaro and EndeavourOS, then I would like to go for Manjaro because of its user-friendly approach and intuitive package management through multiple sources using GUI. Otherwise, just like EndevousOS, it is also available in multiple with multiple desktop environments such as Xfce, LXDE, KDE Plasma, GNOME, Awesome, i3, and more… Its GUI “Software...
12 Best Linux Distros You Should Use
Like Fedora Spins, Manjaro has lots of community versions like Budgie, Cinnamon, and MATE too. Hence, you are not devoid of choices in this case. That said, Manjaro isn’t a pure Arch-based system because it isn’t as cutting-edge as the next option on our list. Manjaro has its own repository where all updates from Arch are merged and pushed later. Stability is of great...
Source: beebom.com
The best Linux distributions (operating systems)
Manjaro Linux is based on the sophisticated Arch Linux, combining a free and individual approach with numerous graphical tools. The result is an operating system that is relatively slim (depending on the version) and makes it easier for newcomers to get started. Manjaro Linux offers several desktop interfaces, the Calamares installation tool and a package management with its...
Source: www.ionos.com
Best Top 20 Ubuntu Linux Alternatives (Pros and Cons)
Manjaro is an Arch Linux-based free and open-source Linux alternative distribution. Manjaro is designed to work straight out of the box with its selection of pre-installed apps. In addition, it employs Pacman as a package manager.
13 Best Linux distros for gaming in 2022
If you like to have the latest and greatest driver support along with a kernel upgrade, a rolling release distribution like Manjaro Linux would be a good pick.

NetBSD Reviews

We have no reviews of NetBSD yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Manjaro seems to be a lot more popular than NetBSD. While we know about 123 links to Manjaro, we've tracked only 3 mentions of NetBSD. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Manjaro mentions (123)

  • Yozora: Linux Configurator
    At some point all of us wanted to have a fully customized and flexible Linux configuration, not having a pre-configured system like Manjaro for example. There must be people out there, who are not a big fans of DE (Desktop Environments). Sure I also got into the arch world with Plasma's KDE, but after a while, it become dull, so that's when I started getting into configuring my setup, but when I had to do it every... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • what machines have you used for development, and what do you prefer?
    I use MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Mid-2014) with Manjaro as OS using i3 as a window manager. It isn't perfect, but I'm thrilled with it. I have been a Mac OS user for the last 15 years and wouldn't change what I have now for a Mac OS because I don't need more than what I'm using for development. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Can I rigg a Chromebook to install Linux on it? Not the virtual Linux they have an option for, I want to replace Chrome OS entirely with Linux.
    At any rate, you can try Breath, Crouton, Manjaro... Those are three of the distros people have found success with. It all boils down to the specific hardware involved... Which we know nothing about since you kept that to yourself. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Windows updated 8 hours into a print. I’m gonna cry.
    Start your new life at https://manjaro.org/. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • [root@archlinux ~]# after login
    But if you were expecting to be able to complete the install and have a GUI available, you might be better off starting with something like Manjaro: Https://manjaro.org. Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

NetBSD mentions (3)

  • Shit they exist
    The idea of config files is fine, it's the implementation I don't like. I was using NetBSD recently for my senior project and found it fine to use - all the documentation is in one place (well, two - the manpages and netbsd.org). It's when the documentation is nonexistent and you have to search through a million different websites and forum posts to find the one line you have to change - that's what gets me. Linus... Source: over 2 years ago
  • Redox OS 0.7.0
    This is what most of the existing open source operating systems are and it is much easier to contribute to those or fork one that does most of what you want. If you are aiming at a POSIX system then there is a fair amount of work but you at least then get a huge amount of already written software that you can run (IIUC Redox is aiming for this but written in Rust). A structure like Qubes OS would make it easier... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • Vulnerabilities in billions of Wi-Fi devices let hackers bypass firewalls
    It looks like one of the vulnerabilities involves being able to sneak in a rogue ICMPv6 route advertisement, with rogue DNS entries. It also mentions doing this kind of stuff against NetBSD 7.1, but that's a couple of versions old, so I guess they were concerned about all the random managed access points floating around? Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Manjaro and NetBSD, you can also consider the following products

Linux Mint - Linux Mint is one of the most popular desktop Linux distributions and used by millions of people.

FreeBSD - FreeBSD is an advanced operating system for x86 compatible (including Pentium® and Athlon™)...

Ubuntu - Ubuntu is a Debian Linux-based open source operating system for desktop computers.

Haiku - Haiku is an open source OS catered specifically to the needs of personal computing.

Fedora - Fedora creates an innovative, free, and open source platform for hardware, clouds, and containers that enables software developers and community members to build tailored solutions for their users.

GhostBSD - GhostBSD is a user friendly desktop operating system based on ...