Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

MadMapper VS Three.js

Compare MadMapper VS Three.js and see what are their differences

RealityMAX
RealityMAX is the AI-powered 3D design collaboration platform, 100% online. Cooperate remotely with your colleagues on 3D projects and easily share your work with clients. Create Web3D and AR experiences in a snap, without a line of code. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

MadMapper logo MadMapper

The Mapping Software

Three.js logo Three.js

A JavaScript 3D library which makes WebGL simpler.
  • MadMapper Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-16
  • Three.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-05

MadMapper features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    MadMapper features a highly intuitive and visually-oriented interface, making it relatively easy for beginners to get started and for experienced users to work efficiently.
  • Versatile Mapping Capabilities
    The software supports a wide range of mapping possibilities, including 2D and 3D projection, LED mapping, and laser control, allowing for versatile creative expression.
  • Real-time Preview
    MadMapper provides real-time preview capabilities, which enables users to see the effects of their adjustments immediately, thereby streamlining the workflow.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    MadMapper is available on both macOS and Windows, ensuring that users on different operating systems can utilize the software without compatibility issues.
  • Extensive Content Library
    The software comes with an extensive library of sample media and templates, which can be handy for users who need quick assets for their projects.

Possible disadvantages of MadMapper

  • High Cost
    MadMapper comes with a relatively high price tag, which may be a barrier for hobbyists or small businesses with limited budgets.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic interface is user-friendly, mastering the more advanced features can require a considerable time investment, particularly for users who are new to projection mapping.
  • Resource-Intensive
    The software can be resource-intensive, requiring a robust computer setup to run smoothly, especially when dealing with complex projects involving high-resolution media.
  • Limited Customer Support
    Some users have reported that official customer support can be slow to respond, which can be a disadvantage for those needing quick assistance with issues or questions.
  • No Mobile App
    MadMapper does not currently offer a mobile app version, limiting its usability to desktop and laptop environments only.

Three.js features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Three.js simplifies the complex task of 3D rendering with an intuitive API, making it accessible to developers who may not have deep expertise in 3D graphics.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Three.js is built upon WebGL, ensuring compatibility across modern browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The library offers extensive documentation, examples, and an active community, which helps in quickly resolving issues and understanding implementation.
  • Integration with HTML and CSS
    Three.js can be easily integrated with HTML and CSS, allowing for the blending of 2D and 3D elements in web applications.
  • Extensive Features
    It supports a wide range of features including cameras, lights, materials, shaders, and post-processing effects, making it highly versatile for various 3D projects.

Possible disadvantages of Three.js

  • Performance Overhead
    Despite its powerful capabilities, Three.js can have significant performance overhead, especially for complex scenes, which might require optimization.
  • Learning Curve
    While easier than raw WebGL, Three.js still has a learning curve, particularly for those new to 3D graphics, requiring time to become proficient.
  • Limited Built-in Advanced Tools
    Although feature-rich, Three.js lacks some advanced tools out-of-the-box compared to more specialized or industry-standard 3D engines, necessitating custom solutions for certain tasks.
  • Dependency on WebGL
    Three.js relies on WebGL, meaning it cannot be used in environments where WebGL is not supported, which can limit accessibility and compatibility.
  • Frequent Updates
    The library is actively developed, which is generally positive, but frequent updates can mean breaking changes, requiring developers to frequently refactor their code.

MadMapper videos

+ Add

MadMapper MiniMAD Demo & Review

More videos:

  • Review - MadMapper Analysis
  • Tutorial - Interactive Wall Kit: How to set up projection mapping with MadMapper

Three.js videos

+ Add

Getting Started With Three.js

More videos:

  • Review - Ricardo Cabello (Mr doob) - 5 years of three.js

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MadMapper and Three.js)

MadMapper

Three.js

3D
100 100%
3D
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
Javascript UI Libraries
100% 100
Interactive Presentations
100 100%
Interactive Presentations
0% 0
Flowcharts
0 0%
Flowcharts
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using MadMapper and Three.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare MadMapper and Three.js

MadMapper Reviews

7 Best Projection Mapping Software 2024 (#1 Video Mapper)
Buy MadMapper: Starts at 449€ one time (about $512.12), for committed visual artists, stage designers, and multimedia production companies that want full lifetime access to MadMapper.
Source: contentmavericks.com
Exploring the top 10 World of LCD Projector Mapping Softwares
MadMapper is a widely recognized software known for its user-friendly interface and powerful features. It offers real-time projection mapping capabilities that facilitate the overlaying of videos, images, and animations onto any surface. With its intuitive tools, users can easily reposition and manipulate content to create stunning projections. This MadMapper offers a nce...
Source: www.sam-inspire.com
Top 7 Alternatives to MadMapper – Amplify Your Projection Mapping Projects!
Projection mapping has become increasingly popular in recent years, transforming ordinary objects into captivating visual displays. MadMapper has long been a favored software tool for projection mapping enthusiasts, allowing users to create stunning projections with ease. However, if you’re looking to explore other options or seeking additional functionality, we have...
Source: www.uubyte.com
5+ best video mapping software for PC
MadMapper is backed by a big community, so they keep updating the software constantly, which is why it has new features such as a Dark User Interface, a live editor to code your own materials, and an online library to share the materials.
Source: windowsreport.com
Top 5 VJ Softwares In 2021
If you’ve been keen to start VJing as a career or even just thought about taking it up part-time to make some extra money on the weekends, chances are you’ve heard of tools like Resolume or MadMapper.
Source: www.themusicscool.in

Three.js Reviews

Top 20 Javascript Libraries
Cross-browser JS library and API that allows for the creation of beautiful animations, Three.js relies on WebGL rather than conventional browser-plugins. Through its library utilities, developers can include complex 3D animations on their website without much effort. Three.js include many features like geometry, lights, materials, shaders, effects, scenes, data loaders,...
Source: hackr.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Three.js seems to be a lot more popular than MadMapper. While we know about 247 links to Three.js, we've tracked only 8 mentions of MadMapper. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

MadMapper mentions (8)

  • Bridging Madmapper and Web: A Real-world Integration Story Guide
    I recently faced a challenge when trying to connect Madmapper to a web application. Since Madmapper only accepts OSC (Open Sound Control) messages, integrating it directly with today's web and mobile technologies was tricky. To overcome this limitation, I built a workaround using Firebase and Node.js — and I'm sharing this guide in case anyone else runs into the same problem. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • NestDrop Midnight Edition v23.15 - PRO VERSION FREE DOWNLOAD
    ⇒ Resolume ⇒ NestMap ⇒ TouchDesigner ⇒ MadMapper ⇒ Any other software listed on the Spout website. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Shared control of pixel-mapped LED fixtures
    Let’s assume these are traditional DMX controlled fixtures - (ie, Colour Force 72). Use something like mad mapper to merge your two sources. While not easy - it is very straightforward. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Simple Projection Mapping Player?
    You also have Millumin and MadMapper for both Windows and Mac, and FaçadeSignage on Windows. Source: over 2 years ago
  • 4k video sliced to nine 720p videos for videowall
    Ive done a number of these sets ups and there should be software to break up the comp for you. The workflow ive used the past is make one 4k comp and then send it thru https://madmapper.com or similar. If you HAVE to do it the way you describe check out render region of interest. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

Three.js mentions (247)

  • Turn your phone into a wireless Joy-Con with SyncoPath
    The phone in the codepath sample got rendered using Three.js. For fun, I also added some beep sound generated using ZZfx when you tap. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • How to Build a Portfolio Website with React
    Also, to make your portfolio stand out to recruiters and clients, you can add some creative and interactive animations to it. The following libraries can help you easily do this: Framer Motion, tsParticles, and Three.js. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Rant: state of generative AI in code generation.
    In my experience with AI code generation, in visual projects like UI development or JavaScript based animation (using three.js or p5.js) etc. AI tools work pretty well. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • My son (9 yrs old) used plain JavaScript to make a game, and wants your feedback
    After he's done with v2, might I propose... THE GAMEY GAME 3D ?? https://threejs.org/ I started coding at 9 as well (which was a long time ago now), so I was very happy to play and see this today. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Optimizing Three.js: 4 Key Techniques
    But code can also create something visually stunning, something everyone can appreciate. This is where tools like Three.js shine. However, Three.js can be heavy, especially when used in a dynamic web page accessed by devices with varying computational power. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MadMapper and Three.js, you can also consider the following products

Resolume - Resolume is an application for live video performances.

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

QLab - QLab, Live show control for Mac OS X.

PixiJS - Fast and flexible WebGL-based HTML5 game and app development library.

TouchDesigner - TouchDesigner is a visual development platform that equips you with the tools you need to create stunning realtime projects and rich user experiences.

Pixi.js - Fast lightweight 2D library that works across all devices

Loading...