Based on our record, WeTransfer seems to be a lot more popular than LZ4. While we know about 245 links to WeTransfer, we've tracked only 7 mentions of LZ4. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
LZ4[1] intentionally compresses worse than Deflate—where Deflate is LZ77 with Huffman, LZ4 is just LZ77. It’s “we’re saturating Gigabit Ethernet and have some compute left over” compression, not “we need to squeeze our backups as much as possible” compression. If filtering+LZ4 does better than Deflate, then you’ve chosen the filter well. Curiously, for some kinds of binary serialization a good filter in... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
It doesn't destroy performance for the simple reason that nowadays memory access has higher latency than pure compute. If you need to use compute to produce some data to be stored in memory, your overall throughput could very well be faster than without compression. There have been a large amount of innovation on fast compression in recent years. Traditional compression tools like gzip or xz are geared towards... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Just looked it up [1] > LZ4 is lossless compression algorithm, providing compression speed > 500 MB/s per core (>0.15 Bytes/cycle). It features an extremely fast decoder, with speed in multiple GB/s per core (~1 Byte/cycle). [1]: https://lz4.github.io/lz4/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Planet: weekly As you can see the planet file has the LZ4 extension, this is a compression-algorithm which a very good speed/size ratio and reduces the size with about 20-25 GB. It. Source: about 2 years ago
I found this interesting dataLZ4 HC (r101) -9) increases transfer speed by about 22%, while only losing a 10% performance on decompression. That's a 12% performance increase overall, not bad! Source: over 2 years ago
That's super weird. Share the Marvelous garment, or just the sleeve,should be enough. I'll have a look. Source: 6 months ago
Https://wetransfer.com/ My wife has an Iphone and I have a pixel 8 pro, we use this platform to send images to each other without losing quality. Source: 6 months ago
Record a short video, good resolution (OBS), of you working, so that I see how you do all that. And if it doesn't help really understanding your problem (I guess it will) then send me a link to that file, I'll have a look. Source: 6 months ago
Vogels intertwined financial savings with environmental responsibility, articulating how minimizing cloud usage correlates with a reduced ecological footprint. He cited WeTransfer as an example, showcasing their remarkable 78% reduction in environmental impact through streamlined server resource consumption, earning them recognition as a Certified B Corporation. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
I upload lots of stuff and I find I have trouble getting past 60mbit upload speed on most drive websites. The only website that I even remotely used close to my potential upload speed is wetransfer.com with ~700mbit. Source: 8 months ago
The Unarchiver - Get the top application for archives on Mac. It's a RAR extractor, it allows you to unzip files, and works with dozens of other formats.
Dropbox - Online Sync and File Sharing
7-Zip ZS - A fork of 7-Zip with support for Brotli, Fast-LZMA2, Lizard, LZ4, LZ5 and Zstandard
Send Anywhere - Send whatever you want, wherever you want
WinZip - The world's best file compressor in the world.
Mega - Secure File Storage and collaboration