LT Browser by Lambdatest Reviews

1. Alick

   | Team Lead at Partnerize | over 3 years ago
   Our go to mobile testing tool

   LT Browser is the new defacto tool for responsive testing requirements. Being a ecommerce company with wide audience we need to stay on our toes to keep our users bouncing because of a UI bug. LT browser has been helping us for the past 3 months with testing on the latest mobile view ports. And my favorite feature is instant local testing by simply adding the URL and side by side comparison of two devices. And best part of the debugging is that we can see the changes being reflected in real time

   🏁 Competitors: BrowserStack, CrossBrowserTesting

   👍 Pros:    Latest devices resolution|Scroll sync with two devices|Intuitive interface|Integration with jira|Instant screenshot and bug reporting flow|Testing on various networks

   👎 Cons:    Cross browser testing is not possible|Missing the test analytics
2. chris-hewins

   | QA Engineer at Toast Inc | over 3 years ago
   Helped us develop mobile websites faster

   As website designers our team loves the way we can show all the progress to our clients. It helped us have a better transparency in our work. We can just screengrab the viewport and easily share it with clients. And the best part is the interface, it's intuitive enough that none of us have ever looked at the support doc. Ability to test the local url path and Integration with JIRA saves a lot of time and makes it easier to communicate within the team. Kudos Team LT Browser..!!

   🏁 Competitors: Blisk Browser

   👍 Pros:    45+ viewports to choose from|Intuitive ui and viewport comparison feature for quick visualisation|Can make changes on the go with the help of inbuilt development tools|Mobile touch feature helps to test user experience in mobile viewports.

   👎 Cons:    Comparison is available for only 2 viewports, it forces users to select and deselect the devices repeatedly. a grid with more devices can be a better solution
3. Alina-Novikava

   | Software QA Engineer at uTest | over 3 years ago
   Must have tool for web designers & developers

   Responsive testing can be a really daunting task. To ensure that all media queries are working properly for specific screen sizes is bound to be time consuming. However, LT browser has made the task comparatively easy for me and my team. It enabled us to test on multiple pre installed devices in no time. Plus, we can test over 2 devices at the same time in a side by side view.

   Our development team relies heavily over this tool since it offers hassle-free local testing experience, supports hot-reloading and offers developer tools to help us debug any UI bug on the go.

   Even our design team loves the LT browser due to its intuitiveness. They are always intrigued to check if the changes are rendering well and as per the design or not after every release cycle. With LT browser, they can do it easily without having to install anything or dealing with developer tools mobile-view debugging

   🏁 Competitors: Blisk

   👍 Pros:    You can integrate project management tools like jira|Simulate network bandwidth to test your website.|It offers two device views, which makes comparing easy by mirroring actions.|You get 30+ pre installed devices to test on and also make your own custom resolution device.

   👎 Cons:    Testing on an internet explorer using our custom device, there is no option!

Otter Browser Reviews

LT Browser by Lambdatest mentions (0)

Otter Browser mentions (20)

• Chrome pushes forward with plans to limit ad blockers in the future

  It took me a bit of searching, but it's nice to know that there are desktop browsers that are not based on Chromium or Gecko, i.e. Webkit [1]. I would like to Otter Browser [2], next time I use my Windows machine. [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/browsers/comments/nkzrj0/comment/gzht47d/ [2] https://otter-browser.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

• If webkit is open source why isn't there a good webkit based browser on windows

  There are WebKit browsers for Windows: Otter Browser and my Split Browser (alpha). Source: about 1 year ago

• Opera consumed more than my RAM size ~3.4GB of 3.2GB!

  Ditch Opera for Otter Browser, which is a spiritual continuation of the classic Opera. Source: over 1 year ago

• What do you think about a lightweight nightly WebKit browser for Windows with split view? I've just made a proof-of-concept in Qt.

  Proof of concept for split screen and based on qt is long available with the otter browser - you may be interested in the project https://otter-browser.org/. Source: almost 2 years ago

• Is Opera GX using more memory than Edge?

  Opera GX is overloaded with features, which take more RAM. Use the regular Opera for more lightweight experience. Or Otter Browser for even less RAM. Source: about 2 years ago