Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

LokiJS VS BuntDB

Compare LokiJS VS BuntDB and see what are their differences

LokiJS logo LokiJS

In-memory JavaScript Datastore with Persistence

BuntDB logo BuntDB

A fast, embeddable, in-memory key/value database for Go with custom indexing and geospatial support
  • LokiJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-29
  • BuntDB Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-17

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to LokiJS and BuntDB)
Databases
39 39%
61% 61
NoSQL Databases
42 42%
58% 58
Key-Value Database
55 55%
45% 45
Time Series Database
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using LokiJS and BuntDB. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BuntDB seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

LokiJS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of LokiJS yet. Tracking of LokiJS recommendations started around Mar 2021.

BuntDB mentions (3)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing LokiJS and BuntDB, you can also consider the following products

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

NeDB - The JavaScript Database, for Node.js, nw.js, electron and the browser - louischatriot/nedb

Beringei - High performance, in-memory storage engine for time series data (by Facebook)

SQLite - SQLite Home Page

Tile38 - Geospatial database and real-time geofence server for managing fleets, mobile apps, and IoT devices.

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.