Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
XSL

Lokalise VS XSLT in-browser implementation

Compare Lokalise VS XSLT in-browser implementation and see what are their differences

DocRaptor
As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Lokalise logo Lokalise

Localization tool for software developers. Web-based collaborative multi-platform editor, API/CLI, numerous plugins, iOS and Android SDK.

XSLT in-browser implementation logo XSLT in-browser implementation

XSLT is a cross-browser API for converting XML data into string or virtual DOM implemented natively with multithreaded streaming processing.
  • Lokalise Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27

Lokalise is a translation management system, which is designed to make the process of localization faster and easier. Our platform reduces manual work and routine tasks that appear while translating web and mobile apps, games, and other software.

With Lokalise you can: ✓ Translate your localization files (.xml, .strings, .json, .xliff, etc). ✓ Collaborate and manage all your software localization projects in one platform. ✓ Integrate translation into the development and deployment process. ✓ Set up automated workflows via API, use webhooks or integrate with other services (GitHub, Slack, JIRA, Sketch, etc). ✓ Add screenshots for automatic recognition and matching with the text strings in your projects. ✓ Upload Sketch artboards to Lokalise and allow translators to work before development starts. ✓ Preview in real-time how the translations will look like in your web or mobile app (iOS and Android SDK). ✓ Order professional translations from Lokalise translators or use machine translation.

  • XSLT in-browser implementation Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-01-28

Lokalise features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Lokalise provides an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface that simplifies the process of managing localization projects, making it accessible even for beginners.
  • Collaboration Features
    Lokalise offers robust collaboration tools that allow team members to work together in real-time, including commenting, version history, and role-based access control.
  • Integration Options
    The platform integrates seamlessly with many third-party applications and development environments (e.g., GitHub, Slack, Jira, and more), streamlining the localization workflow.
  • Automated Workflow
    Lokalise supports automated workflows through API access and webhooks, which can significantly reduce the time and effort required for managing translation processes.
  • Support for Multiple File Formats
    The platform supports a wide range of file formats for both importing and exporting translations, making it versatile for various types of projects.

Possible disadvantages of Lokalise

  • Pricing
    Lokalise can be relatively expensive, especially for small businesses or individual users, as its pricing is more geared towards medium to large enterprises.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic interface is user-friendly, some of the more advanced features and settings can have a steep learning curve, requiring time and effort to master.
  • Limited Offline Capabilities
    Lokalise is primarily a cloud-based platform, which means offline capabilities are limited. Users need an internet connection to access and manage their localization projects.
  • Dependency on Integrations
    While integrations are a strength, heavy reliance on third-party tools means that any issues with these tools can disrupt the localization workflow.
  • Customization Constraints
    Although Lokalise offers several configurable options, there may be limitations in customizing the platform to fit very unique or specific project requirements.

XSLT in-browser implementation features and specs

  • Client-Side Processing
    XSLT processing in the browser shifts the computational load from servers to clients, potentially reducing server load and making better use of client-side resources.
  • Dynamic Page Updates
    XSLT can enable real-time updates to the DOM structure, allowing for dynamic content adjustment based on XML data inputs without needing to reload the web page.
  • Separation of Concerns
    XSLT allows developers to separate the logic for transforming XML data from HTML layout, leading to more organized and maintainable code.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Being an established standardized technology, XSLT is supported by most modern web browsers, enabling good cross-browser functionality.
  • Rich XML Support
    XSLT is designed to handle XML data efficiently, making it a good choice for applications that heavily depend on XML formats.

Possible disadvantages of XSLT in-browser implementation

  • Performance Overhead
    Client-side XSLT transformations can introduce performance overhead, especially on devices with limited processing power or when dealing with large datasets.
  • Complexity
    XSLT has its own syntax that may require a separate learning curve for developers familiar only with JavaScript and HTML, potentially increasing development time.
  • Limited Error Handling
    XSLT lacks robust error handling capabilities, which might make debugging and handling transformation errors more challenging.
  • Inconsistent Browser Support
    While generally supported, XSLT features can behave inconsistently across different browser versions, requiring additional testing and validation.
  • Security Concerns
    Processing XML in the browser might introduce security risks such as exposing internal data structures or vulnerabilities related to XML external entities (XXE).

Lokalise videos

+ Add

Lokalise: Uploading files tutorial. File formats

More videos:

  • Review - Lokalise SDK – Live Edit Module
  • Review - Lokalise: Downloading files

XSLT in-browser implementation videos

No XSLT in-browser implementation videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Lokalise and XSLT in-browser implementation)

Lokalise

XSLT in-browser implementation

Localization
100 100%
Localization
0% 0
Development
0 0%
Development
100% 100
Website Localization
92 92%
Website Localization
8% 8
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
Javascript UI Libraries
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Lokalise and XSLT in-browser implementation. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Lokalise seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Lokalise mentions (12)

  • What is Website Localization?
    There are many products out there such as Lokalize, Crowdin, Weglot, Adobe Target, etc can be used to achieve these experiences. Diving into the details and the general working of these products is out of scope of this blog post. But do give these products a try. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • I need your help with ARB sample files
    I'm pretty sure, you'll find companies like this one which provide a nice GUI for helping with l10n or this one which offers translation services or this page that offers to convert between different formats, one of which probably has a nice GUI tool. Found them by 20 secs of googling. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Localizations in Flutter
    Localise has no problem reading the json files or export to json, we recently started using it in collaboration with external translators. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Why can't Apple fully translate their iOS interface into all supported languages?
    Actually I don't have "my" app. But in our app we use https://lokalise.com/ to localize it even to Norwegian. Our team is not the most expensive company in the world btw. And we don't have 1B+ users all over the world. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Markdown, Asciidoc, or reStructuredText - a tale of docs-as-code
    Internationalization (i18n) pain for a documentation project is a process problem, not a feature gap. Documentation frameworks are not meant to translate your developer docs for you into the language of your choice. Some frameworks might offer i18n support, like the Crowdin support in Docusauraus v2. With Jekyll, you have to pick a theme like this one. I doubt if the reST or adoc frameworks would differ much from... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

XSLT in-browser implementation mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of XSLT in-browser implementation yet. Tracking of XSLT in-browser implementation recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Lokalise and XSLT in-browser implementation, you can also consider the following products

Phrase - A platform offering AI-powered translation tools for localization at scale.

Mustache.js - Minimal templating with {{mustaches}} in JavaScript - janl/mustache.js

POEditor - The translation and localization management platform that's easy to use *and* affordable!

EJS - An open source JavaScript Template library.

Crowdin - Localize your product in a seamless way

Vash - Vash is a template engine that offers a swift flow between code and content using Razor Syntax

Loading...