I'm pretty sure, you'll find companies like this one which provide a nice GUI for helping with l10n or this one which offers translation services or this page that offers to convert between different formats, one of which probably has a nice GUI tool. Found them by 20 secs of googling. Source: about 1 year ago

Localise has no problem reading the json files or export to json, we recently started using it in collaboration with external translators. Source: about 1 year ago

Actually I don't have "my" app. But in our app we use https://lokalise.com/ to localize it even to Norwegian. Our team is not the most expensive company in the world btw. And we don't have 1B+ users all over the world. Source: about 1 year ago

Internationalization (i18n) pain for a documentation project is a process problem, not a feature gap. Documentation frameworks are not meant to translate your developer docs for you into the language of your choice. Some frameworks might offer i18n support, like the Crowdin support in Docusauraus v2. With Jekyll, you have to pick a theme like this one. I doubt if the reST or adoc frameworks would differ much from... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

I've been thinking about building a micro saas very similar to this after having so many issues coordinating the localization of several products I manage. The only robust options in the market are incredibly expensive (for example https://lokalise.com/). Source: almost 2 years ago

There is "Signed Pages" by the debeloper of EteSync. It is a browser extension, that checks webapps based on signatures in the html file. The addon then warns the user if the signature is not correct or - if I remember correctly - the source changed. This allows you to be sure what webapp code was delivered. But it seems like it did not really get used outside of his own projects. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

EteSync has implemented something called Signed Pages, this might be worth looking closer at. This uses PGP keys which is preloaded into the browser; but I suspect that will be a barrier too high for most non-tech users. Source: about 1 year ago

There are also projects like signed web pages which can also help increasing the trust level to some degree. But that requires that you can download the source code and regenerate the verification hash locally - or have other trusted methods to verify the hash value hasn't been modified as well. The current concept is reasonably sane, but it requires too much from users currently to make it widely used. Source: almost 2 years ago

> The server can at any time start serving malicious payloads True, and I call this threat model "Beware Each and Every Fetch" (BEEF) in contrast to the more common TOFU model (although if you trust a desktop app to auto-update itself then these two models might not be all that different). In any case, I think you're being a little quick to dismiss the idea of server-hosted applications. It's true that browsers... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

Something like a browser extension for this does already exist, fortunately: https://github.com/tasn/webext-signed-pages. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago