Logseq Reviews

Stack Overflow Trends Reviews

Logseq mentions (281)

• Enlightenmentware

  Nice! I used https://wiki.systemcrafters.net/emacs/org-roam/ for a while but switched to LogSeq (https://logseq.com/) because org-roam was buggy. I like working with LogSeq, but even after a couple of years of using it, I’m not convinced by the Zettelkasten method. Maybe I’m doing it wrong! - Source: Hacker News / 29 days ago

• Notes on Emacs Org Mode

  Sorry, but _what exactly_ «it seems to do» from your point of view? My «second brain» now is almost 300Mb of text, pictures, sound files, PDF and other stuff. As I already mentioned, it contains tables, mathematical formulae, sheet music, cross-references, code samples, UML diagrams and graphs in Graphviz format. It is versioned, indexed by local search engine, analyzed by AI assistant and shared between many... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

• Why I Like Obsidian

  Obsidian is great. For those looking for an open source alternative (or don't want to pay the Obsidian fees for professional usage) check out Logseq: https://logseq.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

• Obsidian 1.5 Desktop (Public)

  For an opensource alternative to Obsidian checkout Logseq (1). I spent a while thinking obsidian was opensource out of my own ignorance and was disappointed when I learned it was not. 1: https://logseq.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

• How do you track your daily tasks?

  I use logseq to keep journal of my daily work. Source: 6 months ago

Stack Overflow Trends mentions (28)

• D Programming Language

  It has, but it wasn't adopted by the pragmatists in that time. It's hard to tell if the early adopters adopted it either - It doesn't show up at all in the 2023 stack overflow survey (nor in the previous two years) - https://survey.stackoverflow.co/2023/#technology-most-popular-technologies - It doesn't show up in questions asked on Stackoverflow since 2008 -... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

• We migrated our back end from Vercel to Fly.io and the challenges we faced

  > In 2017 I had React projects in production for years. I doubt that. React wasn't stable until 2015, and wasn't mainstream until 2016. > And it only got worse and the overengineering to make it looks fast in the first load is not worth it as modern JS frameworks are faster than React out-of-the-box. Again, Next.js != React; the former builds on the latter, it doesn't replace it nor does it claim to be the same... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• We migrated our back end from Vercel to Fly.io and the challenges we faced

  > Prior to Next.js, React was hard to setup and maintain No, it wasn't. > I started using Next.js in 2017. It made React a real production framework In 2017 I had React projects in production for years. > React was hard to setup and maintain and hard to make it go fast (on first load) And it only got worse and the overengineering to make it looks fast in the first load is not worth it as modern JS frameworks are... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• Ask HN: Why Did Python Win?

  Based on what? https://insights.stackoverflow.com/trends?tags=python%2Cjava. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

• Ask HN: Why Did Python Win?

  Fair enough, my information is outdated. StackOverflow agrees. [1] [1] https://insights.stackoverflow.com/trends?tags=django%2Cruby-on-rails. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago