Loc.gov VS ScienceDirect

Because this book was published in 2007, it's likely that digitized newspapers were not as widely available as they are in 2023. Nonetheless, in the appendix it can be seen that she tables roughly 150 attacks from all types of breeds between 1864 and 1899. Roughly 10 of these attacks are attributed to bulldog-types. 10 attacks in 36 years doesn't sound that bad, right? Unfortunately, Delise is working with a... Source: about 1 year ago

I was going to email this to RE but it came up with a pretty quick google search, and I thought other folks might be interested in it too. Its a copy of Vol. 5, No. 1 of the Journal of the Tantrick Order. I think this is the same one described by Robert in the latest episode. If anyone wants to look for more info, you could try searching the loc.gov website (it's down for me right now) or directly emailing a... Source: about 1 year ago

I wonder if there needs to be a cultural equivalent, where a repository of digital or physical artifacts is "too big to fail" because of the negative cultural impact their failure would have. Here it is: https://loc.gov. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

Internet Archive Library of Congress Your local library (mine has online books/magazines/movies/TV/music, online learning). Source: about 1 year ago

Have you looked at archive.org or loc.gov? It's not jazz, but I've used library of congress (loc) early recordings of the desouza orchestra for large video projects, since it is in the public domain. Source: about 1 year ago

You can research some more in those two sites (especially in sciencedirect.com, you can filter by open studies if you are broke like me). Source: 10 months ago

That's incorrect. You also need to get some better sources. EPA.gov, the ICCT report, and sciencedirect.com are highly political institutions. Source: about 1 year ago

First of all, sciencedirect.com is not a peer reviewed science site. it gets a 2 out of 4 stars when rated by actual scientists. Source: over 1 year ago

The source "sciencedirect.com" is at the end of the quote and you can easily do your own research but you won't. Also the point is to show the hypocrisy that people accept random standards like that because you're programmed to. Source: over 1 year ago

You might want to look at building a passive solar water heater. According to sciencedirect.com, "passive solar water heating systems generally transfer heat by natural circulation as a result of buoyancy due to temperature difference between two regimes; hence they do not require pumps to operate. They are the most commonly used solar water heating systems for domestic application." They are non-electric. Source: over 1 year ago