No LiveKit videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
LiveKit might be a bit more popular than WireGuard. We know about 13 links to it since March 2021 and only 9 links to WireGuard. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Another open-source SFU I've had great experience with is Livekit[0]. Great docs, modern, easy to deploy (it's a golang binary), and supports a number of egress options too if you want to record the media during a stream to an external system. With their cloud product they've also built a really cool 'mesh-based' SFU-CDN that allows peers to connect to an SFU closest to them and have their media broadcast to other... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
I love the service and would recommend everyone dump the webRTC integrated service and make the switch. It was quick and easy to make the changes with livekit.io setup providing everything I needed to get the custom service set up and running. No command line config is needed and only set up on my GM side of Foundry VTT. My users only have to select their player token the first time they log on as usual, and... Source: 6 months ago
I found https://livekit.io/ which is completely open sourced and you can even self host it. Source: 6 months ago
This release ships lots of new features to the already comprehensive set of them. Currently, we offer several working tutorials on how to set up STUNner with widely used WebRTC media servers and other applications that use WebRTC in Kubernetes, such as: - LiveKit - Jitsi - mediasoup - n.eko - Kurento. Source: 8 months ago
Install the LiveKit module (https://foundryvtt.com/packages/avclient-livekit). Then register for the free LiveKit tier (https://livekit.io/) with 50GB/month (that's probably enough for 4 people at least 8 times a month for 3 hours from my experience). Easy to use, good quality, we had no issues so far. Source: about 1 year ago
Wireguard. Wireguard uses UDP only and runs TCP sockets over UDP. Source: about 1 year ago
Look at Wireguard. I know you don't want Yet Another VPN running alongside your IPSec, but it's less VPN and more encrypted point-to-point UDP. You can set it up on any port you wish, including common ports that might be open on an outbound smart firewall not doing deep packet inspection. That way, it can stay out of the way of your existing IPSec deployment. Source: about 1 year ago
We use Elixir/Erlang for our control plane, and Rust for our data plane, built on the excellent WireGuard® tunneling protocol. Source: about 1 year ago
Both products are based off Wireguard which is available for all new linux distributions. https://wireguard.com . I'm not saying OP's solution is wrong, just curious what the advantages are. Other than potentially simpler client setup, what are the advantages of paying for tailscale. With the opensource tailscale, I'm not sure if you get access to an api you can use to look up the hosts. Source: over 1 year ago
Noise Protocol Framework (used by Wireguard). Source: over 1 year ago
Liveapi - Launch your live video streaming app in days
OpenVPN - OpenVPN - The Open Source VPN
100ms Live - Video and Live Streaming infra for a video-first world
ZeroTier - Extremely simple P2P Encrypted VPN
Video Calling API by videosdk.live - Add Google meet like any product, in a few minutes 🔥
ProtonVPN - ProtonVPN is a security focused FREE VPN service, developed by CERN and MIT scientists. Use the web anonymously, unblock websites & encrypt your connection.