Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

LiveKit VS Cachy

Compare LiveKit VS Cachy and see what are their differences

Fileport
The fastest way to send files over the internet featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

LiveKit logo LiveKit

The open source platform for real-time communication

Cachy logo Cachy

Find, Connect, Talk & Share.
  • LiveKit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-14
  • Cachy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-29

LiveKit features and specs

  • Scalability
    LiveKit is designed to scale, allowing developers to build applications that can support many concurrent users, making it suitable for large projects.
  • Real-time Communication
    It provides low-latency audio and video streaming which is crucial for real-time communication applications like video conferencing and online gaming.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, LiveKit provides transparency and flexibility, allowing developers to modify and extend the platform according to their needs.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    LiveKit offers SDKs for various platforms, enabling developers to build applications for web, iOS, and Android easily.
  • Feature Rich
    It comes with a comprehensive set of features such as adaptive bit rate, selective forwarding unit (SFU) support, and more, providing developers with the tools needed to build robust applications.

Possible disadvantages of LiveKit

  • Complexity
    The multitude of features and scalability options might pose a steep learning curve for new developers unfamiliar with real-time communication technologies.
  • Infrastructure Requirement
    To leverage the full potential of LiveKit, robust server infrastructure might be required, which can increase setup costs and maintenance efforts.
  • Customization Overhead
    While offering extensive flexibility, the open-source nature and advanced capabilities might require significant customization work to meet specific application needs.
  • Niche Use Cases
    It is specifically designed for audio and video communication. For other types of real-time applications, additional tools might be necessary.

Cachy features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

LiveKit videos

No LiveKit videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Cachy videos

+ Add

Cachy OS – Best Arch Distro? | Impressive, Fast & Secure

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to LiveKit and Cachy)

LiveKit

Cachy

Video Streaming
86 86%
Video Streaming
14% 14
Productivity
0 0%
Productivity
100% 100
Developer Tools
84 84%
Developer Tools
16% 16
Web App
0 0%
Web App
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using LiveKit and Cachy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, LiveKit seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 16 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

LiveKit mentions (16)

  • WebRTC for the Curious
    So, I am not familiar with "simple-peer" but there are some definite inter-browser quirks relating to datachannels which it might be taking care of. I seem to recall one browser always prefixes the buffers with sequence numbers, for example. Really fun stuff like that, but I would hope that is history by now. My preference would be to use the standard webrtc api, and then use a polyfill style library for uniform... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Launch HN: Pinch (YC W25) – Video conferencing with immersive translation
    Curious about this approach! It looks like you're connecting to https://livekit.io/ under the hood - do you have custom server side components intercepting the video stream and doing video analysis & lip movement patching there? - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Huly – Open-Source All-in-One Project Management Platform
    Video conferencing in Hulu does not need Zoom, etc and currently utilizes the awesome LiveKit (https://livekit.io), which is also open source. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • WebRTC for the Curious
    Another open-source SFU I've had great experience with is Livekit[0]. Great docs, modern, easy to deploy (it's a golang binary), and supports a number of egress options too if you want to record the media during a stream to an external system. With their cloud product they've also built a really cool 'mesh-based' SFU-CDN that allows peers to connect to an SFU closest to them and have their media broadcast to other... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Anyone have experience with LiveKit for voice and if it's better than the webRTC?
    I love the service and would recommend everyone dump the webRTC integrated service and make the switch. It was quick and easy to make the changes with livekit.io setup providing everything I needed to get the custom service set up and running. No command line config is needed and only set up on my GM side of Foundry VTT. My users only have to select their player token the first time they log on as usual, and... Source: over 1 year ago
View more

Cachy mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Cachy yet. Tracking of Cachy recommendations started around Jan 2023.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing LiveKit and Cachy, you can also consider the following products

100ms Live - Video and Live Streaming infra for a video-first world

Sprout - When HP’s Sprout Pro was introduced in 2014, everyone saw the possibilities.

Video Calling API by videosdk.live - Add Google meet like any product, in a few minutes 🔥

Liveapi - Launch your live video streaming app in days

Miro - Scalable, secure, cross-device and enterprise-ready team collaboration tool for distributed teams. Join 2M+ users & 8000+ teams from around the world.

Dyte.io - Integrate live video calling into your product within minutes

Loading...