Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

LiteSpeed Web Server VS mongrel

Compare LiteSpeed Web Server VS mongrel and see what are their differences

LiteSpeed Web Server logo LiteSpeed Web Server

LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

mongrel logo mongrel

A small fast HTTP library and server that runs Rails, Camping, Nitro and Iowa apps.
  • LiteSpeed Web Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-31
  • mongrel Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-20

LiteSpeed Web Server features and specs

  • Performance
    LiteSpeed is known for its high performance, handling more traffic with fewer resources compared to traditional web servers like Apache.
  • Built-in Caching
    It comes with LSCache, which provides advanced server-side caching, significantly boosting loading times for web applications.
  • Security
    LiteSpeed includes built-in anti-DDoS features, application-level distributed defense, and the ability to mitigate different kinds of attacks effectively.
  • Easy Apache Replacement
    LiteSpeed is compatible with Apache's htaccess, mod_rewrite, and mod_security, making it easy to switch from Apache without changing configurations.
  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 Support
    LiteSpeed supports modern protocols such as HTTP/2 and HTTP/3, making it suitable for the latest website requirements and performance enhancements.

Possible disadvantages of LiteSpeed Web Server

  • Cost
    LiteSpeed is a commercial solution, and its licensing fees can be a disadvantage for smaller businesses or individual developers.
  • Proprietary Software
    Being a proprietary solution, it doesn’t offer the transparency and community support advantages of open-source web servers like Apache and Nginx.
  • Learning Curve
    Switching to LiteSpeed may involve a learning curve, especially for those accustomed to other web server technologies.
  • Limited Customization
    It may not offer the same level of customization and flexibility as some other web servers, particularly in specialized or highly unique environments.

mongrel features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Mongrel is known for its straightforward setup and ease of use, particularly advantageous for developers who want a lightweight and easy-to-configure HTTP server for Ruby applications.
  • Performance
    Mongrel offers good performance for handling HTTP requests, making it suitable for serving small to medium-sized Ruby applications efficiently.
  • Compatibility
    It supports many Ruby web frameworks, which makes it versatile for various types of Ruby applications, including Rails, Merb, and Camping.
  • Community Support
    Being a popular choice in the past, it has garnered substantial community support, resources, and tutorials available for troubleshooting and learning.

Possible disadvantages of mongrel

  • Lack of Maintenance
    Mongrel is no longer actively maintained, which may pose security risks and compatibility issues with newer versions of Ruby and other software.
  • Scalability
    It is not as scalable as more modern web servers like Puma or Unicorn, often requiring more effort to manage workloads for larger applications.
  • Limited Features
    Mongrel lacks some of the advanced features found in newer web servers, such as multi-threading and robust process management, which can limit its use for complex, high-demand applications.
  • Obsolescence
    With the rise of more modern and efficient web servers, Mongrel has largely been eclipsed and is not the go-to choice for new Ruby applications.

LiteSpeed Web Server videos

What Is LiteSpeed Web Server?

More videos:

  • Review - What Is LiteSpeed Web Server?

mongrel videos

Mongrel K9 Boots Review: Unleashing Style, Comfort, and Durability

More videos:

  • Review - Mongrel Boots - The 3 Reasons They Are Best Sellers
  • Review - Mongrel Boots Review. Before and After a Season of Fieldwork.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to LiteSpeed Web Server and mongrel)
Web And Application Servers
Web Servers
93 93%
7% 7
Application Server
95 95%
5% 5
Development Tools
69 69%
31% 31

User comments

Share your experience with using LiteSpeed Web Server and mongrel. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare LiteSpeed Web Server and mongrel

LiteSpeed Web Server Reviews

Litespeed vs Nginx vs Apache: Web Server Showdown
LiteSpeed Web Server, abbreviated as LSWS, is almost a newcomer to the webserver ‘scene’. It has gained a huge, perhaps even cult-like following in the last few years among web hosting companies due to its efficiency. With its streamlined architecture, companies running LiteSpeed Web Server could (theoretically) double the maximum capacity of websites their servers, assuming...
Source: chemicloud.com
Top Linux Web Servers: Pros and Cons
LiteSpeed comes in two versions: a free one known as OpenLiteSpeed and a paid enterprise version with extended functionality.
Source: bigstep.com
Alternative web servers compared: Lighttpd, Nginx, LiteSpeed and Zeus
Brief info: LiteSpeed is a commercial web server designed specifically for large websites. One of LiteSpeed’s advantages is that it can read Apache configurations directly which makes it easy to integrate with existing products to replace Apache. The server is lightweight and as the name implies very fast.
Source: www.pingdom.com

mongrel Reviews

We have no reviews of mongrel yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, mongrel seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

LiteSpeed Web Server mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of LiteSpeed Web Server yet. Tracking of LiteSpeed Web Server recommendations started around Mar 2021.

mongrel mentions (1)

  • Why am I getting an Apache Proxy 503 error?
    Now after restart, we get a 503 error when trying to visit the domain connected to Redmine. It's hooked up to a Mongrel daemon, and we use Apache Proxy to direct all connections to the port Redmine is running on. Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing LiteSpeed Web Server and mongrel, you can also consider the following products

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

lighttpd - A secure, fast, compliant, and very flexible web-server that has been optimized for high-performance environments

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

Forge - Static web hosting made simple