Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

linkerd VS Apache APISIX

Compare linkerd VS Apache APISIX and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

linkerd logo linkerd

Linkerd is an ultralight service mesh for Kubernetes. It gives you observability, reliability, and security without requiring any code changes.

Apache APISIX logo Apache APISIX

Apache APISIX is a dynamic, real-time, high-performance Cloud-Native API gateway, based on the Nginx library and etcd.
  • linkerd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-18
  • Apache APISIX Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-27

linkerd features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Linkerd is known for its minimal resource usage compared to other service meshes, making it a good choice for environments where resource constraints are a concern.
  • Ease of Use
    Designed to be user-friendly, Linkerd offers a simple installation process and an easy-to-understand interface for managing microservices.
  • High Performance
    Linkerd offers low-latency communication between services, providing efficient and high-performance service mesh functionality.
  • Security Features
    Linkerd provides built-in security features such as mTLS (mutual TLS) for service-to-service encryption, ensuring secure communications within the mesh.
  • Kubernetes Native
    Linkerd is designed to work seamlessly with Kubernetes, providing native integrations and simplifying operations for Kubernetes-based environments.

Possible disadvantages of linkerd

  • Feature Limitations
    Compared to some other service meshes, Linkerd offers fewer features and might not satisfy every use case, particularly for advanced scenarios.
  • Resource Overhead
    Although lightweight, running a service mesh introduces additional components that consume system resources, which might be a concern in very resource-constrained environments.
  • Ecosystem Maturity
    Linkerd's ecosystem and community are not as large as some other service meshes, potentially leading to fewer third-party integrations and support resources.
  • Complexity in Large Scale
    While simple for smaller deployments, managing Linkerd at scale can become complex, requiring more intricate configuration and monitoring.
  • Learning Curve
    Adopting Linkerd, like any service mesh, involves a learning curve that requires teams to understand concepts of service mesh architecture and operations.

Apache APISIX features and specs

  • High Performance
    Apache APISIX is built on top of Nginx and designed to handle thousands of requests per second. This makes it suitable for high-performance applications and services requiring efficient request processing.
  • Dynamic Configuration
    APISIX allows for dynamic load balancing, routing, and plugin configuration without the need to restart or reload the service, offering robust flexibility and reducing downtime.
  • Extensive Plugin Ecosystem
    APISIX offers a wide range of plugins to extend its functionalities, covering authentication, security, traffic control, and more, allowing for customization and scalability.
  • Open Source and Community-driven
    Being an Apache project, APISIX is open-source and actively maintained by a community of contributors, ensuring continuous improvement and support.
  • Multi-language Support
    APISIX supports multi-language plugins such as Java, Go, and Python, thereby allowing developers to write plugins in the language they are most comfortable with.

Possible disadvantages of Apache APISIX

  • Complexity of Setup
    Setting up Apache APISIX can be complex for new users, requiring familiarity with Nginx and understanding its configuration model, which might involve a steep learning curve.
  • Documentation Gaps
    While the project is actively improved, some users might experience gaps or inconsistencies in the documentation, posing challenges during setup and customization.
  • Limited Enterprise Support
    Compared to some commercial API management solutions, APISIX might lack dedicated enterprise-level support, which could be a concern for organizations requiring rapid troubleshooting and expert assistance.
  • Evolving Features
    As a relatively new project, some features and components may still be evolving, which means users may encounter changes that require adaptation and adjustments over time.

linkerd videos

Introduction to Linkerd for beginners | a Service Mesh

More videos:

  • Review - Deep Dive: Linkerd - Oliver Gould, Buoyant
  • Review - 60 seconds to a Linkerd service mesh on AKS | Azure Friday

Apache APISIX videos

Getting started with Apache APISIX Dashboard

More videos:

  • Review - Getting started with Apache APISIX
  • Review - APIs security with Apache APISIX

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to linkerd and Apache APISIX)
Developer Tools
57 57%
43% 43
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Web Servers
100 100%
0% 0
API Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using linkerd and Apache APISIX. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache APISIX should be more popular than linkerd. It has been mentiond 72 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

linkerd mentions (18)

  • Evaluating 2 Popular Service Meshes
    The decision to add a Service Mesh to an application comes down to how your application communicates between itself. If for instance your design is heavily asynchronous and relies on events and messages, then a service mesh isn't going to make a lot of sense. If however, you've built an application that is heavily reliant on APIs between itself, then a service mesh is a great piece of technology that can make this... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Fastly and the Linux kernel
    The open source projects Fastly uses and the foundations we partner with are vital to Fastly’s mission and success. Here's an unscientific list of projects and organizations supported by the Linux Foundation that we use and love include: The Linux Kernel, Kubernetes, containerd, eBPF, Falco, OpenAPI Initiative, ESLint, Express, Fastify, Lodash, Mocha, Node.js, Prometheus, Jenkins, OpenTelemetry, Envoy, etcd, Helm,... - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • eBPF, sidecars, and the future of the service mesh
    William: My first pick would be Linkerd. It's a must-have for any Kubernetes cluster. I then lean towards tools that complement Linkerd, like Argo and cert-manager. You're off to a solid start with these three. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Optimal JMX Exposure Strategy for Kubernetes Multi-Node Architecture
    Leverage a service mesh like Istio or Linkerd to manage communication between microservices within the Kubernetes cluster. These service meshes can be configured to intercept JMX traffic and enforce access control policies. Benefits:. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Ultimate EKS Baseline Cluster: Part 1 - Provision EKS
    From here, we can explore other developments and tutorials on Kubernetes, such as o11y or observability (PLG, ELK, ELF, TICK, Jaeger, Pyroscope), service mesh (Linkerd, Istio, NSM, Consul Connect, Cillium), and progressive delivery (ArgoCD, FluxCD, Spinnaker). - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
View more

Apache APISIX mentions (72)

  • Automating APISIX TLS Secrets with CertManager using Argo Events: A Hands-On Guide
    To install APISIX, follow the APISIX documentation. In this article, we assume you’ve installed APISIX with the Admin API in the gateway namespace. - Source: dev.to / 2 days ago
  • Announcing Integration between Apache APISIX and open-appsec WAF
    Apache APISIX is a modern, flexible, and high-performance open-source API gateway solution designed to handle various use cases in microservices and cloud-native architectures. Its primary purpose is to facilitate API management by serving as a gateway for managing, securing, and optimizing API traffic between clients and backend services. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • open-source API gateway solutions and their managed offerings.
    Kong and APISIX, two popular open-source #APIGateway solutions. #kong looks versatile Unified Gateway but how it fares against #APISIX backed by a similar enterprise API7 offering. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Free tier API with Apache APISIX
    Lots of service providers offer a free tier of their service. The idea is to let you kick their service's tires freely. If you need to go above the free tier at any point, you'll likely stay on the service and pay. In this day and age, most services are online and accessible via an API. Today, we will implement a free tier with Apache APISIX. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • OpenResty on NixOS for an API Gateway
    We have been using Apache APISIX for a while now. It is a high-performance, cloud-native API gateway solution. It also has a nice dashboard for managing APIs. However, I have been looking for a simpler and more portable solution for our use case. In particular, I want to be able manage the API gateway as a NixOS service so that the configuration can be tested and redeployed easily. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing linkerd and Apache APISIX, you can also consider the following products

Istio - Open platform to connect, manage, and secure microservices

Prometheus - An open-source systems monitoring and alerting toolkit.

Docker Hub - Docker Hub is a cloud-based registry service

API7 cloud - API management platform for hybrid and multi-cloud

Apache Thrift - An interface definition language and communication protocol for creating cross-language services.

httpbin(1) - HTTP request and response service