Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

LightGallery VS Underscore.js

Compare LightGallery VS Underscore.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

LightGallery logo LightGallery

A modern, electron and nodejs based image viewer for Mac, Windows and Linux.

Underscore.js logo Underscore.js

Underscore is a utility-belt library for JavaScript that provides a lot of the functional...
  • LightGallery Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-28
  • Underscore.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-12-17

LightGallery features and specs

  • User Interface
    LightGallery offers a clean and modern user interface that is both intuitive and visually appealing. This makes it easy for users to navigate through galleries and view images without any clutter.
  • Responsive Design
    The gallery is fully responsive, ensuring that images are displayed nicely across all device types and screen sizes, from desktops to mobile phones.
  • Customizability
    LightGallery provides a range of customization options, allowing developers to modify the look and feel of the gallery to suit specific needs and preferences.
  • Performance
    Optimized for performance, LightGallery ensures fast loading times and smooth transitions and animations, enhancing user experience.
  • Extensible with Plugins
    LightGallery supports various plugins that can extend its functionality, such as video support and social sharing, offering added capabilities to users.

Possible disadvantages of LightGallery

  • Learning Curve
    For users unfamiliar with setting up JavaScript libraries, there might be a learning curve associated with configuring and customizing LightGallery.
  • Dependency Management
    Depending on the project setup, managing dependencies and ensuring that all required files are included can be a challenge for those less experienced in front-end development.
  • Advanced Features Cost
    Some advanced features or plugins may require a paid version, which can be a downside for those seeking a completely free solution.
  • Potential Overhead
    For simple image galleries, the extensive features of LightGallery could be considered overkill, potentially adding unnecessary complexity and overhead.
  • Browser Compatibility
    While largely compatible with modern browsers, there could be occasional inconsistencies or issues when dealing with older web browsers.

Underscore.js features and specs

  • Utility Functions
    Underscore.js provides a wealth of utility functions for common tasks such as map, reduce, filter, and more, making it easier to perform operations on arrays, objects, and collections.
  • Consistency
    The library offers a consistent API, which can make your code more readable and maintainable by providing a standard way to perform common programming tasks.
  • Lightweight
    Underscore.js is lightweight compared to full-featured libraries like Lodash, which can be a benefit if you're looking to minimize your application's footprint.
  • Browser Compatibility
    It supports a wide range of JavaScript environments, making it a good choice for projects that need to work across different browsers and Node.js.
  • Quick to Learn
    Easy to pick up for developers with even a basic understanding of JavaScript, due to its straightforward documentation and familiar function names.

Possible disadvantages of Underscore.js

  • Performance
    Underscore.js may not offer the same level of performance optimizations as more modern utility libraries like Lodash, potentially leading to slower execution for some tasks.
  • Limited Functionality
    While it covers many basic utility functions, its feature set is not as extensive as Lodash or other similar libraries, which provide a broader range of capabilities.
  • Outdated
    With the advent of ECMAScript 5 and later versions, many of the functions provided by Underscore.js are now natively available in JavaScript, reducing its necessity.
  • No Modularization
    Underscore does not support modular builds in the same way Lodash does, meaning you might end up including the entire library even if you only need a few functions.
  • Community and Maintenance
    While still maintained, Underscore.js has seen less active development and contributions compared to newer libraries, which could impact its long-term viability and support.

LightGallery videos

Frontend - 005 - lightGallery

Underscore.js videos

Introduction to Underscore.JS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to LightGallery and Underscore.js)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
Web Frameworks
100 100%
0% 0
Development Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using LightGallery and Underscore.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Underscore.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 23 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

LightGallery mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of LightGallery yet. Tracking of LightGallery recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Underscore.js mentions (23)

  • JavaScript evolution: From Lodash and Underscore to vanilla
    Underscore was created by Jeremy Ashkenas (the creator of Backbone.js) in 2009 to provide a set of utility functions that JavaScript lacked at the time. It was also created to work with Backbone.js, but it slowly became a favorite among developers who needed utility functions that they could just call and get stuff done with without having to worry about the inner implementations and browser compatibility. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • KlongPy: High-Performance Array Programming in Python
    There was a step-change improvement for me when I tried expressing some JS patterns via `underscore.js` instead of procedurally: eg: http://underscorejs.org/#each Thinking of something as `each | map | filter | sum` is waaay less buggy than writing bespoke procedural code to do the same thing. No doubt there is a "cost" to it as well, but the _abstraction_ is valuable. Now, if there were a "compiler" which could... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • 100+ Must-Have Web Development Resources
    Underscore.js: A utility library that offers a full set of functional programming helpers without extending any built-in JavaScript objects. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Mastering Node.js
    Underscore contains just about every core utility method you want. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • 8 NPM Packages for JavaScript Beginners [2024][+tutorials]
    Not too far behind is Underscore.js, another utility library that's all about enhancing your JavaScript mojo. Whether you're dealing with arrays, objects, or strings, Underscore has got something for you. It's like Lodash's sibling, offering similar functionalities but with its own flair. The choice between them is like picking between chocolate and vanilla - it really comes down to personal taste. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing LightGallery and Underscore.js, you can also consider the following products

Magnific Popup - The greater part of Lightbox modules will completely preload a picture before showing it.

jQuery - The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.

jQuery Lightbox - jQuery Lightbox plugins are utilized to showcase images and other web stuff using modal dialogs.

React Native - A framework for building native apps with React

prettyPhoto - prettyPhoto is a jQuery Lightbox clone.

Babel - Babel is a compiler for writing next generation JavaScript.