Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

liblab VS LiveKit

Compare liblab VS LiveKit and see what are their differences

liblab logo liblab

Generate SDKs and documentation that stay in sync with your API

LiveKit logo LiveKit

The open source platform for real-time communication
  • liblab
    Image date //
    2025-03-13

liblab is an SDK generation platform that helps companies create high-quality, developer-friendly SDKs for their APIs in multiple languages. Our technology automates the process of generating, maintaining, and optimizing SDKs, ensuring compliance and best practices while saving engineering teams time. We work with fintech, telecommunications, and other industries that rely on robust API ecosystems. Backed by $50 million in funding, liblab is focused on making SDK development seamless and scalable.

  • LiveKit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-14

liblab

Website
liblab.com
$ Details
freemium
Platforms
JavaScript Java Go Python .Net TypeScript Kotlin
Release Date
2022 January
Startup details
Country
United States
State
Texas
City
Austin

liblab features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

LiveKit features and specs

  • Scalability
    LiveKit is designed to scale, allowing developers to build applications that can support many concurrent users, making it suitable for large projects.
  • Real-time Communication
    It provides low-latency audio and video streaming which is crucial for real-time communication applications like video conferencing and online gaming.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, LiveKit provides transparency and flexibility, allowing developers to modify and extend the platform according to their needs.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    LiveKit offers SDKs for various platforms, enabling developers to build applications for web, iOS, and Android easily.
  • Feature Rich
    It comes with a comprehensive set of features such as adaptive bit rate, selective forwarding unit (SFU) support, and more, providing developers with the tools needed to build robust applications.

Possible disadvantages of LiveKit

  • Complexity
    The multitude of features and scalability options might pose a steep learning curve for new developers unfamiliar with real-time communication technologies.
  • Infrastructure Requirement
    To leverage the full potential of LiveKit, robust server infrastructure might be required, which can increase setup costs and maintenance efforts.
  • Customization Overhead
    While offering extensive flexibility, the open-source nature and advanced capabilities might require significant customization work to meet specific application needs.
  • Niche Use Cases
    It is specifically designed for audio and video communication. For other types of real-time applications, additional tools might be necessary.

liblab videos

End-to-end SDK generation and publishing in your CI/CD pipeline with liblab and GitHub Actions

LiveKit videos

No LiveKit videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to liblab and LiveKit)
APIs
43 43%
57% 57
Video Streaming
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
31 31%
69% 69
Utilities
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using liblab and LiveKit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, LiveKit should be more popular than liblab. It has been mentiond 16 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

liblab mentions (5)

  • Redefining our SDKs Developer Experience
    After evaluating multiple SDK-as-a-service vendors, including Speakeasy, Fern and Liblab, we selected Speakeasy as our strategic partner. Speakeasy’s philosophy aligns with our mission to deliver an outstanding developer experience. Here’s why we’re excited about this partnership:. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • How to build an SDK from scratch: Tutorial & best practices
    SDKs are a powerful way to improve the developer experience of your API. They come with a cost - the amount of work needed to generate them. This is why automation is so important. With liblab you can automate the process of generating SDKs, and keep them in sync with your API as it evolves. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • How to add Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to your app using generated SDKs
    When it comes to generating SDKs, liblab is your friend. Liblab is a platform that generates SDKs from your OpenAPI spec, so you can use them in your app. Whether you are accessing internal APIs, or third party APIs, all you need is an API spec, and liblab will generate the SDK for you. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • 6 Practical tools for building a great engineering culture
    At liblab, we tackle complex engineering problems to build SDKs for our customers and their end users, who are engineers themselves. Our team's extensive knowledge in software, software-as-a-service solutions, and developer tools is critical to our success. Therefore, retaining our talented developers is a priority. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • The Stainless SDK Generator
    How do you guys differ against https://www.speakeasyapi.dev and https://www.buildwithfern.com? - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

LiveKit mentions (16)

  • WebRTC for the Curious
    So, I am not familiar with "simple-peer" but there are some definite inter-browser quirks relating to datachannels which it might be taking care of. I seem to recall one browser always prefixes the buffers with sequence numbers, for example. Really fun stuff like that, but I would hope that is history by now. My preference would be to use the standard webrtc api, and then use a polyfill style library for uniform... - Source: Hacker News / 20 days ago
  • Launch HN: Pinch (YC W25) – Video conferencing with immersive translation
    Curious about this approach! It looks like you're connecting to https://livekit.io/ under the hood - do you have custom server side components intercepting the video stream and doing video analysis & lip movement patching there? - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Huly – Open-Source All-in-One Project Management Platform
    Video conferencing in Hulu does not need Zoom, etc and currently utilizes the awesome LiveKit (https://livekit.io), which is also open source. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • WebRTC for the Curious
    Another open-source SFU I've had great experience with is Livekit[0]. Great docs, modern, easy to deploy (it's a golang binary), and supports a number of egress options too if you want to record the media during a stream to an external system. With their cloud product they've also built a really cool 'mesh-based' SFU-CDN that allows peers to connect to an SFU closest to them and have their media broadcast to other... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Anyone have experience with LiveKit for voice and if it's better than the webRTC?
    I love the service and would recommend everyone dump the webRTC integrated service and make the switch. It was quick and easy to make the changes with livekit.io setup providing everything I needed to get the custom service set up and running. No command line config is needed and only set up on my GM side of Foundry VTT. My users only have to select their player token the first time they log on as usual, and... Source: over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing liblab and LiveKit, you can also consider the following products

Fern - Describe your API endpoints, types, errors, and examples. Generate SDKs, documentation, and server boilerplate.

100ms Live - Video and Live Streaming infra for a video-first world

Video Calling API by videosdk.live - Add Google meet like any product, in a few minutes 🔥

OpenAI - GPT-3 access without the wait

Liveapi - Launch your live video streaming app in days

Dyte.io - Integrate live video calling into your product within minutes