Learn X in Y minutes VS A.I. Experiments by Google

> Sure, maybe for some esoteric edge cases, but 5 mins on https://learnxinyminutes.com/ should get you 80% of the way there, and an afternoon looking at big projects or guidelines/examples should you another 18% of the way. Not for C++, and even for other languages, it's not the language that's hard, it's the idioms. Python written by experts can be well-nigh incomprehensible (you can save typing out... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago

> Learning a new language shouldn't be difficult. Programmers are expected to familiarize themselves with new tech. I wish any large company agreed with this. I've worked for a company that on boarded every single new engineer to a very niche language (F#) in a few days. Also, everybody I worked with there was amazing. Probably because of that kind of mindset. Meanwhile google tiptoes around teams adopting kotlin... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago

When I want to get a quick feel for a language I've never heard of, I usually look for the Learn X in Y Minutes[0] page for it. Shen doesn't have one. Perhaps the author and/or poster should remedy that? [0] https://learnxinyminutes.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

Learn x in y minutes: Concise tutorials to learn various programming languages and tools quickly. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

StackOverflow's making their own competing LLM for all this stuff. IMO, one of the biggest problems with the way people use LLMs right now, is that they're being treated as a single oracle: to know Java, it must be trained on examples of Java. It would be much better if their language comprehension abilities were kept separated from their knowledge (and there are development efforts in this direction), so in this... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

Try this: https://experiments.withgoogle.com/collection/ai. Source: over 1 year ago

But Google has a whole set of AI writing tools - https://experiments.withgoogle.com/collection/ai So by their own definition they are producing spam? - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

Https://experiments.withgoogle.com/collection/ai might also help (I haven't used this IRL). Source: over 2 years ago

It's hard to imagine you've not seen Google's doodle guessing training (or their other experiments) but it's just another example of how little information you actually need to create a recognizable image, though Canvas also shows this off, but it has the benefit of material information. Source: over 2 years ago

To come back to your original question, as far as I'm aware anyone can publish on arxiv or researchgate. People will just tend to take you less serious. Maybe a better solution for you is something like this https://experiments.withgoogle.com/collection/ai . You already said you think your idea might be industry changing so if it truly is, I'm sure people will start noticing you. Source: almost 3 years ago