Lean VS Coq

Coq

Coq is a proof assistant, which allows you to write mathematical proofs in a rigorous and formal...

Landing page //
2021-08-03

Landing page //
2022-04-17

Substance Review: Lean

Coq videos

+ Add

Ubiquinol CoQ-10 Supplement Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Lean and Coq)

Coq

Programming Language

38 38%

Programming Language

62% 62

OOP

41 41%

OOP

59% 59

Generic Programming Language

50 50%

Generic Programming Language

50% 50

iPhone

100 100%

iPhone

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Lean and Coq. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Lean and Coq

Lean Reviews

22 Best Wrike Alternatives For Project Management in 2020 (Free & Paid)

Pros: Emphasizing optimization and eliminating waste for engineers, Leankit embraces Lean project management. It incorporates visualization boards (the Kanban approach) to help you quickly see the status of all your project tasks.

Source: www.workzone.com

Coq Reviews

We have no reviews of Coq yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Coq seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 46 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Lean mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Lean yet. Tracking of Lean recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Coq mentions (46)

The First Stable Release of a Rust-Rewrite Sudo Implementation
Are those more important than, say: - Proven with Coq, a formal proof management system: https://coq.inria.fr/ See in the real world: https://aws.amazon.com/security/provable-security/ And check out Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
In Which I Claim Rich Hickey Is Wrong
Dafny and Whiley are two examples with explicit verification support. Idris and other dependently typed languages should all be rich enough to express the required predicate but might not necessarily be able to accept a reasonable implementation as proof. Isabelle, Lean, Coq, and other theorem provers definitely can express the capability but aren't going to churn out much in the way of executable programs;... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
If given a list of properties/definitions and relationship between them, could a machine come up with (mostly senseless, but) true implications?
Still, there are many useful tools based on these ideas, used by programmers and mathematicians alike. What you describe sounds rather like Datalog (e.g. Soufflé Datalog), where you supply some rules and an initial fact, and the system repeatedly expands out the set of facts until nothing new can be derived. (This has to be finite, if you want to get anywhere.) In Prolog (e.g. SWI Prolog) you also supply a set of... Source: 10 months ago
Mark Petruska has requested 250000 Algos for the development of a Coq-avm library for AVM version 8
Information about the Coq proof assistant: https://coq.inria.fr/ , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coq. Source: 11 months ago
Basic SAT model of x86 instructions using Z3, autogenerated from Intel docs
This type of thing can help you formally verify code. So, if your proof is correct, and your description of the (language/CPU) is correct, you can prove the code does what you think it does. Formal proof systems are still growing up, though, and they are still pretty hard to use. See Coq for an introduction: https://coq.inria.fr/. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago