Software Alternatives & Reviews

Coq VS Haskell

Compare Coq VS Haskell and see what are their differences

Coq logo Coq

Coq is a proof assistant, which allows you to write mathematical proofs in a rigorous and formal...

Haskell logo Haskell

An advanced purely-functional programming language
  • Coq Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-17
  • Haskell Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-01

We recommend LibHunt Haskell for discovery and comparisons of trending Haskell projects.

Coq videos

Ubiquinol CoQ-10 Supplement Review

More videos:

  • Review - Gumbenni listened to Sseth's review on Coq

Haskell videos

Functional Programming & Haskell - Computerphile

More videos:

  • Review - Marloe Haskell Review
  • Review - Marloe Watch Company - Haskell - Watch Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Coq and Haskell)
Programming Language
25 25%
75% 75
OOP
31 31%
69% 69
Generic Programming Language
Technical Computing
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Coq and Haskell. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Coq should be more popular than Haskell. It has been mentiond 46 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Coq mentions (46)

  • The First Stable Release of a Rust-Rewrite Sudo Implementation
    Are those more important than, say: - Proven with Coq, a formal proof management system: https://coq.inria.fr/ See in the real world: https://aws.amazon.com/security/provable-security/ And check out Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • In Which I Claim Rich Hickey Is Wrong
    Dafny and Whiley are two examples with explicit verification support. Idris and other dependently typed languages should all be rich enough to express the required predicate but might not necessarily be able to accept a reasonable implementation as proof. Isabelle, Lean, Coq, and other theorem provers definitely can express the capability but aren't going to churn out much in the way of executable programs;... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • If given a list of properties/definitions and relationship between them, could a machine come up with (mostly senseless, but) true implications?
    Still, there are many useful tools based on these ideas, used by programmers and mathematicians alike. What you describe sounds rather like Datalog (e.g. Soufflé Datalog), where you supply some rules and an initial fact, and the system repeatedly expands out the set of facts until nothing new can be derived. (This has to be finite, if you want to get anywhere.) In Prolog (e.g. SWI Prolog) you also supply a set of... Source: 10 months ago
  • Mark Petruska has requested 250000 Algos for the development of a Coq-avm library for AVM version 8
    Information about the Coq proof assistant: https://coq.inria.fr/ , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coq. Source: 12 months ago
  • Basic SAT model of x86 instructions using Z3, autogenerated from Intel docs
    This type of thing can help you formally verify code. So, if your proof is correct, and your description of the (language/CPU) is correct, you can prove the code does what you think it does. Formal proof systems are still growing up, though, and they are still pretty hard to use. See Coq for an introduction: https://coq.inria.fr/. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
View more

Haskell mentions (21)

  • Is there a programming language that will blow my mind?
    Haskell - a general-purpose functional language with many unique properties (purely functional, lazy, expressive types, STM, etc). You mentioned you dabbled in Haskell, why not try it again? (I've written about 7 things I learned from Haskell, and my book is linked at them bottom if you're interested :) ). Source: 11 months ago
  • Where to go from here?
    Where you go is entirely up to you. According to haskell.org, Haskell jobs are a-plenty. sigh. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Haskell.org now has "Get Started" page!
    Should they be part of haskell.org or something else? Source: about 1 year ago
  • Haskell.org now has "Get Started" page!
    Haskell.org now has a big purple Get Started button that takes you to a nice short guide (haskell.org/get-started) that quickly provides all the basic info to get going with Haskell. It is aimed for beginners, to reduce choice fatigue and to give them a clear, official path to get going. Source: about 1 year ago
  • dev environment for windows
    I just jumped into the wiki "Write Yourself a Scheme in 48 hours" which looks pretty good. (although some of the text explanation is hard to understand without context).. I used cabal to set up the starter project. Sublime editor seems to work OK and I just use the git Bash shell on windows to compile the program directly on the command line. So maybe this is all good enough for now (?). It seems installing... Source: over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Coq and Haskell, you can also consider the following products

Agda - Agda is a dependently typed functional programming language. It has inductive families, i.e.

Rust - A safe, concurrent, practical language

Isabelle - Isabelle is a proof assistant for writing and checking mathematical proofs by computer.

Python - Python is a clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.

Idris - Programming, Programming Language, Learning Resources, Languages, and Frontend Development

JavaScript - Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions