Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Launchpad.net VS Pijul

Compare Launchpad.net VS Pijul and see what are their differences

Launchpad.net logo Launchpad.net

Launchpad is a software collaboration platform by Canonical

Pijul logo Pijul

Pijul is a free and open source distributed version control system based on a sound theory of...
  • Launchpad.net Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23
  • Pijul Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-01

Launchpad.net videos

Review: LaunchPad X vs MINI MK3 // Custom layout tutorial // Novation LaunchPad

More videos:

  • Review - Novation Launchpad MK2 Review
  • Review - LAUNCHPAD X – What is it and what can it do?

Pijul videos

No Pijul videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Launchpad.net and Pijul)
Code Collaboration
65 65%
35% 35
Git
62 62%
38% 38
Software Development
90 90%
10% 10
Git Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Launchpad.net and Pijul. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Launchpad.net and Pijul

Launchpad.net Reviews

The Top 10 GitHub Alternatives
Launchpad is a collaborative development platform primarily used for the Ubuntu operating system and other open-source projects. Created by Canonical Ltd., Launchpad offers services to make software development easier, including bug tracking, code reviews, and translations. We explicitly indicate this is the Canonical project because German software giant SAP has a tool with...

Pijul Reviews

We have no reviews of Pijul yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Launchpad.net should be more popular than Pijul. It has been mentiond 65 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Launchpad.net mentions (65)

  • Popover API
    This doesn’t sound right at all. Ubuntu itself doesn’t have an ESR package, only https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/firefox which is at 125. The Mozilla PPA does have an ESR package, but per https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa?field.series_filter=focal it’s at 115. has been supported since Firefox 98, meaning ESR 91 was the last release lacking it, and it reached end of support... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Quickemu: Quickly run optimised Windows, macOS and Linux virtual machines
    I agree, but I think that model of GPG is not how it's used any more. I think nowadays people upload a one-shot CI key, which is used to sign builds. So you're basically saying "The usual machine built this". Which is good information, don't get me wrong, but it's much less secure than "John was logged into his laptop and entered the password for the key that signed this" So, you're right, that GPG verifies... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Mozilla's new Firefox Linux package for Ubuntu and Debian derivatives
    You can use https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/, but that's no official Mozilla repository. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Mozilla's new Firefox Linux package for Ubuntu and Debian derivatives
    As a user of the PPA packages (https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa), now I'm confused. Are these the same packages? Should I switch? I'd have appreciated at least a mention in the article. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Firefox Developer Edition and Beta: Try Out Mozilla's .deb Package
    There's also a PPA: https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa Though you'll have to convince Ubuntu to prefer that instead of the snap. It's not hard, certainly easier than installing Debian which is probably still what I should have done. I think I used this guide: https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2022/04/how-to-install-firefox-deb-apt-ubuntu-22-04 Though what that doesn't tell you is that the snap... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
View more

Pijul mentions (43)

  • The Weird Nerd comes with trade-offs
    IMO Open Source software communities are where folks like you can really thrive. They're much closer at something like a meritocracy than traditional workplaces. > I want to make the next-gen version control system While you certainly could invent one yourself, you could consider contributing to popular ones like git/mercurial. It'd help teach you both the positive and the negative aspects of their design... - Source: Hacker News / 12 days ago
  • Version Control Beyond Git
    The feature I think I would most like to see is support for patches as a more first-class object. For example reverts and cherry picks have no real metadata. This leads to conflicts when merging branches that have cherry picks (although they often auto-resolve if they are exactly the same diff) and makes asking "Does $branch contain $patch" basically impossible to answer. https://pijul.org/ greatly improves this... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Pijul is a free and open source (GPL2) distributed version control system
    In Pijul, conflicts are not modelled as a "failure to merge", but rather as the standard case. Specifically, conflicts happen between two changes, and are solved by one change. The resolution change solves the conflict between the same two changes, no matter if other changes have been made concurrently. Once solved, conflicts never come back. - from https://pijul.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Josh: Just One Single History
    Do not try and bend the spoon, that's impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth...there is no spoon. Then you will see it is not the spoon that bends, it is only yourself -- what Pijul users say when they overhear git users arguing with each other about monorepos. https://pijul.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Introduction to Loro's Rich Text CRDT
    I believe that handling merges like this correctly was a motive for designing pijul: https://pijul.org See the item on the splash page about 'merge correctness'. Unfortunately I wasn't able to find the post detailing the behavior with a bit of searching. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Launchpad.net and Pijul, you can also consider the following products

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.

GitHub Desktop - GitHub Desktop is a seamless way to contribute to projects on GitHub and GitHub Enterprise.