Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Launchpad.net VS GNU Savannah

Compare Launchpad.net VS GNU Savannah and see what are their differences

Launchpad.net logo Launchpad.net

Launchpad is a software collaboration platform by Canonical

GNU Savannah logo GNU Savannah

Savannah is a central point for development, distribution and maintenance of free software, both GNU and non-GNU.
  • Launchpad.net Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23
  • GNU Savannah Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-31

Launchpad.net features and specs

  • Integrated Development Environment
    Launchpad provides a suite of tools to manage projects, bugs, and code, streamlining the development lifecycle.
  • Bug Tracking System
    It offers a robust bug tracking system that facilitates reporting, managing, and fixing bugs, enhancing project quality.
  • Bazaar Version Control
    Launchpad supports the Bazaar version control system, allowing easy collaboration and branch management.
  • Translation Management
    The platform includes a translation tool that helps manage and integrate translations in multiple languages.
  • PPA Hosting
    Launchpad provides Personal Package Archives (PPAs) hosting, which makes it easier to distribute software packages.
  • Community and Collaboration
    It fosters a strong community environment, enabling developers to collaborate effectively on open-source projects.
  • Integration with Ubuntu
    Launchpad integrates closely with Ubuntu, making it the go-to platform for many Ubuntu-related projects and packages.
  • Free for Open-Source Projects
    It is free to use for open-source projects, making it accessible for developers working on non-commercial initiatives.

Possible disadvantages of Launchpad.net

  • Limited Version Control Options
    Launchpad primarily focuses on the Bazaar version control system, which is less popular compared to Git, and does not natively support Git as seamlessly as other platforms.
  • User Interface
    Some users find the Launchpad user interface to be less intuitive and harder to navigate compared to other platforms like GitHub or GitLab.
  • Performance Issues
    Occasionally, users report performance issues and slow response times on the platform, which can hinder productivity.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    There is a steep learning curve for new users, particularly those unfamiliar with Bazaar or the platform's unique features.
  • Less Popular
    It is less popular than alternatives like GitHub or GitLab, which means fewer available resources, fewer integrations, and a smaller community.
  • Limited Enterprise Features
    Launchpad lacks some of the advanced enterprise features available in paid versions of other platforms, such as detailed access controls and integration with enterprise software.
  • Dependency on Ubuntu
    The platform's close integration with Ubuntu can be a limitation for projects that are not tied to the Ubuntu ecosystem.

GNU Savannah features and specs

  • Free Software Hosting
    GNU Savannah is dedicated to hosting free software projects and aligns with the Free Software Foundation's philosophy, ensuring that projects remain free and open-source.
  • Community-Oriented
    The platform provides a community that emphasizes collaboration and the sharing of knowledge, fostering a culture of community-led development.
  • Customizable Project Tools
    Offers a suite of tools like mailing lists, bug tracking, and version control systems that are tailored for managing free software projects.
  • Strong Ethical Guidelines
    Projects hosted on GNU Savannah must adhere to strong ethical guidelines, ensuring they respect user freedoms and privacy.

Possible disadvantages of GNU Savannah

  • Limited User Interface
    The interface of GNU Savannah is less modern and can be less intuitive compared to other more popular platforms like GitHub or GitLab.
  • Niche Platform
    Savannah caters specifically to free software projects, which might not be appealing to developers seeking broader project exposure or proprietary software projects.
  • Fewer Integrations
    Compared to larger commercial platforms, GNU Savannah offers fewer third-party integrations, which might limit the flexibility in integrating with modern development workflows.
  • Steeper Learning Curve
    The platform may require more time to learn and customize due to its unique set of tools and guidelines, potentially hindering project onboarding.

Launchpad.net videos

Review: LaunchPad X vs MINI MK3 // Custom layout tutorial // Novation LaunchPad

More videos:

  • Review - Novation Launchpad MK2 Review
  • Review - LAUNCHPAD X – What is it and what can it do?

GNU Savannah videos

GNU Savannah: 100% free software mass-hosting

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Launchpad.net and GNU Savannah)
Code Collaboration
82 82%
18% 18
Git
81 81%
19% 19
Software Development
77 77%
23% 23
Project Management
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Launchpad.net and GNU Savannah. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Launchpad.net and GNU Savannah

Launchpad.net Reviews

The Top 10 GitHub Alternatives
Launchpad is a collaborative development platform primarily used for the Ubuntu operating system and other open-source projects. Created by Canonical Ltd., Launchpad offers services to make software development easier, including bug tracking, code reviews, and translations. We explicitly indicate this is the Canonical project because German software giant SAP has a tool with...

GNU Savannah Reviews

We have no reviews of GNU Savannah yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Launchpad.net seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 66 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Launchpad.net mentions (66)

  • Rust in QEMU Roadmap
    I think I'm missing why you need to require using the toolchain bundled with the last stable Debian release vs having devs just rustup the latest version of the toolchain (or via a PPA [1] or however else they want to install it). The current approach basically guarantees that you're always targeting a ~2-4 year old version of the toolchain and that feels like a particularly weird maintenance burden given how many... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Popover API
    This doesn’t sound right at all. Ubuntu itself doesn’t have an ESR package, only https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/firefox which is at 125. The Mozilla PPA does have an ESR package, but per https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa?field.series_filter=focal it’s at 115. has been supported since Firefox 98, meaning ESR 91 was the last release lacking it, and it reached end of support... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
  • Quickemu: Quickly run optimised Windows, macOS and Linux virtual machines
    I agree, but I think that model of GPG is not how it's used any more. I think nowadays people upload a one-shot CI key, which is used to sign builds. So you're basically saying "The usual machine built this". Which is good information, don't get me wrong, but it's much less secure than "John was logged into his laptop and entered the password for the key that signed this" So, you're right, that GPG verifies... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Mozilla's new Firefox Linux package for Ubuntu and Debian derivatives
    You can use https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/, but that's no official Mozilla repository. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Mozilla's new Firefox Linux package for Ubuntu and Debian derivatives
    As a user of the PPA packages (https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa), now I'm confused. Are these the same packages? Should I switch? I'd have appreciated at least a mention in the article. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

GNU Savannah mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of GNU Savannah yet. Tracking of GNU Savannah recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Launchpad.net and GNU Savannah, you can also consider the following products

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

Bonobo Git Server - Set up your own self hosted git server on IIS for Windows.

BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.

Gitstack - GitStack is a free software that let you setup your own private Git server on Windows.