Based on our record, Launchpad.net should be more popular than GitHub Enterprise. It has been mentiond 66 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I think I'm missing why you need to require using the toolchain bundled with the last stable Debian release vs having devs just rustup the latest version of the toolchain (or via a PPA [1] or however else they want to install it). The current approach basically guarantees that you're always targeting a ~2-4 year old version of the toolchain and that feels like a particularly weird maintenance burden given how many... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
This doesn’t sound right at all. Ubuntu itself doesn’t have an ESR package, only https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/firefox which is at 125. The Mozilla PPA does have an ESR package, but per https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa?field.series_filter=focal it’s at 115. has been supported since Firefox 98, meaning ESR 91 was the last release lacking it, and it reached end of support... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
I agree, but I think that model of GPG is not how it's used any more. I think nowadays people upload a one-shot CI key, which is used to sign builds. So you're basically saying "The usual machine built this". Which is good information, don't get me wrong, but it's much less secure than "John was logged into his laptop and entered the password for the key that signed this" So, you're right, that GPG verifies... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
You can use https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/, but that's no official Mozilla repository. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
As a user of the PPA packages (https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa), now I'm confused. Are these the same packages? Should I switch? I'd have appreciated at least a mention in the article. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Internal is a special visibility level used by GitHub Enterprise, allowing anyone inside your organization to see the repository, but nobody in the outside world. We generally suggest this as the default level for company projects that don’t have siloed sensitive information (such as customer-specific data or logic that only a specific group should know about). - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
If the company you work for has subscribed to Github, you probably benefit from a more substantial offer with additional features (GitHub Team or GitHub Enterprise). - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
Some orgs run GitHub Enterprise on-prem. Set up properly, it's not publicly accessible at all. Source: about 2 years ago
I do. My company has an enterprise license and it basically just acts as a private corner of normal public-facing github. Basically like a private repo but instead of being scoped to a single repo it's a full multi-organization scope. All new report default to private, but can be flipped to public if we want to open-source some internal project. Source: about 2 years ago
Https://github.com/enterprise you can host it yourself or in the cloud. Source: about 3 years ago
GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.
GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab
BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.
Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service
SourceForge - The Complete Open-Source and Business Software Platform.
GitBucket - GitBucket is the easily installable open-source GitHub clone written with Scala.