Larva Labs VS MakersPlace

Compare Larva Labs VS MakersPlace and see what are their differences

ABcard

ABcard - service allows you to issue an unlimited number of cards to pay for advertising accounts. 3 unique BINs for any work tasks, management of a team of media buyers inside a personal account and complete anonymity when paying for traffic. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Larva Labs

Data Visualizations for Flutter Web

MakersPlace

Create, sell and collect truly unique digital creations.

Landing page //
2022-12-18

Landing page //
2022-04-23

Larva Labs

Website: larvalabs.com

Edit details

MakersPlace

Website: makersplace.com

Edit details

Larva Labs videos

No Larva Labs videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

MakersPlace videos

+ Add

GrowYourBase & Makersplace Partnership with An Exclusive NFT

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Larva Labs and MakersPlace)

Larva Labs

MakersPlace

Crypto

48 48%

Crypto

52% 52

Art

46 46%

Art

54% 54

Cryptocurrencies

71 71%

Cryptocurrencies

29% 29

Fintech

0 0%

Fintech

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Larva Labs and MakersPlace. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, MakersPlace seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 15 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Larva Labs mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Larva Labs yet. Tracking of Larva Labs recommendations started around Dec 2022.

MakersPlace mentions (15)

War bonds, NFTs and crypto: How Ukraine is funding its defense
To take Beeple's $69M NFT as an example, its JSON metadata points us to an IPFS gateway run by http://makersplace.com. Source: about 2 years ago
We shall not let them sell
In theory, but if the hashed file is a JSON that contains a link for the media source of "ipfsgateway.makersplace.com/[UNIQUE STRING]", and makersplace.com goes under, wouldn't it be very challenging to recover the actual file stored on the p2p network and update the embedded link? Source: about 2 years ago
We shall not let them sell
Most IPFS hash's return a JSON file that contains a link to an IPFS gateway that is hosted by the company that minted the NFT. Sure this type may not expire on its own, but if makersplace.com goes under, ipfsgateway.makersplace.com will cease to be hosting anything. Source: about 2 years ago
We shall not let them sell
More likely that the art will live as long as the gateway provider lives. Even for the $65M Beeple purchase, the IPFS hash points to a gateway provided by makersplace.com, which is an NFT minting startup. If they go bust, no one maintains the IPFS gateway, and the $65M NFT points to an IPFS hash that returns a json file that contains a description, a few properties related to the NFT, and a dead link. Source: about 2 years ago
What does it takes to earn $100k from NFT art? Insights from crunching the data.
More than half of the artists $100K club sell on more than one platform, the average being two. SuperRare was the most popular amongst the sample group followed closely by MakersPlace. https://media.giphy.com/media/l0MYvOjkBiEB0zjTq/giphy.gif. Source: over 2 years ago