Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Laravel VS Moleculer

Compare Laravel VS Moleculer and see what are their differences

Laravel logo Laravel

A PHP Framework For Web Artisans

Moleculer logo Moleculer

Fast & modern microservices framework for Node.js.
  • Laravel Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-24
  • Moleculer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-21

Laravel features and specs

  • Eloquent ORM
    Laravel includes Eloquent ORM, which provides a beautiful and simple ActiveRecord implementation for working with your database. It allows for easy interaction with your databases, offering an intuitive syntax.
  • Blade Templating Engine
    The Blade templating engine offers a clean and efficient syntax for writing templates. It provides features like template inheritance and sections, which makes template design more manageable and organized.
  • Artisan CLI
    Laravel's Artisan Command Line Interface (CLI) allows developers to perform repetitive tasks and manage their Laravel project more efficiently with built-in commands for database migration, seeding, and building tasks.
  • Strong Community and Ecosystem
    Laravel has a large and active community that provides an abundance of resources, including packages, tutorials, and screencasts on Laracasts. This ecosystem allows for quick problem-solving and an extensive library of reusable components.
  • Robust Security Features
    Laravel provides built-in security features such as salted and hashed passwords, encryption, and protection against common vulnerabilities like SQL injection and cross-site request forgery (CSRF).
  • Efficient Testing
    Laravel comes with PHPUnit integrated, along with convenient helper methods, making writing test cases and performing automated testing more straightforward. This leads to better code reliability and fewer bugs.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    Laravel has thorough and well-organized documentation that covers all its features in detail. This makes it easier for new and experienced developers to understand and use the framework effectively.

Possible disadvantages of Laravel

  • Performance Overhead
    Since Laravel is a full-featured framework, it includes many built-in functions and layers that can create performance overhead. For very high-performance applications, fine-tuning may be necessary.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Beginners
    For those new to web development or coming from a different programming paradigm, Laravel can be challenging to grasp initially due to its extensive features and modern PHP practices.
  • Heavy Dependency on Composer
    Laravel heavily relies on Composer for dependency management. While this is beneficial for package management, it can be a downside if you are not familiar with Composer or have issues managing packages.
  • Frequent Updates
    Laravel receives frequent updates and changes in the new versions, which can sometimes lead to compatibility issues with existing projects. Keeping up with the updates can be time-consuming.
  • Hosting Requirements
    Laravel requires specific server configurations and dependencies, which may not be available on all shared hosting services. This can necessitate using a Virtual Private Server (VPS) or dedicated server, which might have higher costs.

Moleculer features and specs

  • Microservices Architecture
    Moleculer provides an efficient microservices framework which allows developers to build robust and scalable distributed systems effortlessly.
  • Out-of-the-Box Features
    Moleculer offers an extensive array of built-in features such as service discovery, load balancing, fault tolerance, and more, reducing the need for third-party integrations.
  • Ease of Use
    Its straightforward API and comprehensive documentation make it easy to learn and implement, even for developers who are new to microservices.
  • Pluggable Transport Layer
    Supports different transporters such as NATS, MQTT, Kafka, and Redis, giving flexibility in how services communicate with each other.
  • Performance
    Designed for high performance, Moleculer can handle a large number of requests efficiently, making it suitable for production-level applications.

Possible disadvantages of Moleculer

  • Complexity in Large Systems
    As with any microservices framework, managing a large number of services can become complex and may require robust monitoring and orchestration tools.
  • Learning Curve
    While Moleculer is easy to start with, mastering it and understanding all its features and best practices may require time.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    Compared to more established frameworks, Moleculer may have a smaller community and ecosystem which can affect the availability of third-party plugins or modules.
  • Dependency Management
    Ensuring compatibility between different versions of services and third-party libraries can be challenging, especially when services are updated independently.
  • Debugging and Error Handling
    Distributed systems can be more complex to debug, and although Moleculer provides tools for this, it may still require extra effort compared to monolithic applications.

Laravel videos

Laravel in 100 seconds

More videos:

  • Review - Why Laravel is Still Best in 2018

Moleculer videos

MoleculeR review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Laravel and Moleculer)
Developer Tools
95 95%
5% 5
Web Frameworks
97 97%
3% 3
Python Web Framework
100 100%
0% 0
JavaScript Framework
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Laravel and Moleculer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Laravel and Moleculer

Laravel Reviews

Laravel vs. Symfony: A Comprehensive Comparison of PHP Frameworks
Laravel has a vibrant ecosystem with many first-party packages, such as Laravel Horizon for queue management, Laravel Echo for real-time events, and Laravel Sanctum for API authentication, that make it easy to extend functionality without much hassle.
The 20 Best Laravel Alternatives for Web Development
Oh, you bet. When devs talk Symfony, they’re eyeing robustness and a modular vibe that Laravel fans might miss. Its reusable components could tempt even the most loyal Laravel artisans to at least take a peek.
Top 9 best Frameworks for web development
The best frameworks for web development include React, Angular, Vue.js, Django, Spring, Laravel, Ruby on Rails, Flask and Express.js. Each of these frameworks has its own advantages and distinctive features, so it is important to choose the framework that best suits the needs of your project.
Source: www.kiwop.com
Top 5 Laravel Alternatives
However, there are other excellent choices other than Laravel as well. So, let’s check out some excellent Laravel alternatives before you hire Laravel developers India for your web development project. This post provides you with a thorough understanding of the available web development framework choices and their benefits over Laravel. For that, let’s first discuss the...
Framework review: Laravel vs CodeIgniter
Let's start with CodeIgniter first. It focuses on performance and speed. It offers a simple, easy-to-learn syntax, making it ideal for beginners. CodeIgniter uses its own proprietary Active Record implementation for database operations, which provides a simple and intuitive way to interact with data. Unlike Laravel, CodeIgniter does not enforce a specific architectural...
Source: infinyhost.com

Moleculer Reviews

We have no reviews of Moleculer yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Laravel seems to be a lot more popular than Moleculer. While we know about 240 links to Laravel, we've tracked only 14 mentions of Moleculer. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Laravel mentions (240)

View more

Moleculer mentions (14)

  • Make microservices look like monoliths
    My goto for this kind of task is moleculer: https://moleculer.services/ Fast, battle tested, vue2-like approach, great documentation, good community. The automatic indipendent-scalability as an option is usually the main selling point of these solutions, but honestly I think the real pro is the "composition" approach, which is essential if you want to keep a clean and well-organized codebase. On this regard, I... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • How to Import/Reference a Microservice from another one
    If you’re using k8s, check out https://moleculer.services and this would likely solve what you’re looking for. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Node JS Microservice Frameworks for Developing Scalable Web Apps.
    Molecular – Progressive Microservices Framework for Node.js. Source: about 2 years ago
  • First time building microservice-based application
    While you’re delving into microservices, check out Moleculer https://moleculer.services. Source: over 2 years ago
  • if Nodejs does not meant for CPU intensive tasks so I think it's better to avoid it from the beginning
    I almost can’t believe I haven’t seen it mentioned here before, but adding Moleculer into your node project (if it’s clustered/k8s’d) will literally solve many single threaded problems, not to mention tons of other scalability issues. https://moleculer.services/. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Laravel and Moleculer, you can also consider the following products

Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines

Nest.js - A progressive Node.js framework for building efficient, reliable and scalable server-side applications.

Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...

ExpressJS - Sinatra inspired web development framework for node.js -- insanely fast, flexible, and simple

CodeIgniter - A Fully Baked PHP Framework

KintoHub - A modern fullstack app platform