Laminar VS Buddy

Laminar Reviews

Buddy Reviews

1. firomero    

   Developer at Codechanic | about 3 years ago
   Buddy Rocks

   I have around two years when met buddy for my personal projects. I found it intuitive and great. I almost can set up pipelines with closed eyes. It helped me with development and learning. I recommend also startups and mature projects.

   🏁 Competitors: Jenkins

   👍 Pros:    Intuitive|Easy to use|Verbose|Great user experience

   👎 Cons:    A bit expensive
2. Jalib Hussain Khan    

   Software Engineer at All Resource Technologies | about 3 years ago
   Best there ever was

   Buddy works is the most awesome automating CI application, it lets you deploy sites at the best convenience. It also automatically detects the type of language your application uses and gives you the recommendation regarding the commands which should be executed

   🏁 Competitors: CircleCI, Codeship, Travis CI
3. Lucas Pereira    

   CTO at Tezus | about 3 years ago
   The best solution for continuous delivery

   I have a eCommerce company and the Buddy helps us to delivery all projects and maintain the our platform updated. The Buddy is easy to implements and easy to operate, definitively, the best solution

   🏁 Competitors: CircleCI, Travis CI

   👍 Pros:    Easy to use|Easy user interface|Easy integration|Fast|Database documentation|Tools integrations|Visual

   👎 Cons:    Higher base price

Laminar mentions (7)

• Log4j2 nightmares for self hosters?

  Delve into Laminar would be my suggestion. Source: over 2 years ago

• Self-hosted CI/CD options?

  I like Laminar as a lightweight, self-hosted CI solution. Source: over 2 years ago

• What CI tool should I go with?

  For a lightweight solution, I like to recommend Laminar CI. Source: over 2 years ago

• Gitlab CI server alternative that is more FOSS

  Laminar is a lightweight and modular CI system licensed under GPLv3. I like that it allows me to build the CI solution that fits my given use case the best. Source: over 2 years ago

• Looking for a classical non-hosted CI platform that works and is not Jenkins

  I find Laminar quite interesting in this space. It might help you too to build your own lightweight CI solution that does exactly what your use case requires. Source: almost 3 years ago

Buddy mentions (10)

• Most Useful CI/CD Tools for DevOps

  Buddy CI/CD is an automation platform designed to streamline and accelerate software development and deployment processes. By emphasizing simplicity and efficiency, Buddy offers an intuitive UI that allows teams to set up, monitor, and execute pipelines with minimal friction. - Source: dev.to / 15 days ago

• We use GitHub Actions to build GitHub

  We switched to buddy.works[0] about a year ago and honestly it’s just been… smooth. The UI is just great, the wealth and breadth of options is ever increasing and all the basics like knowing what went wrong, restarting, debugging, duplicating etc just work as you’d expect. One of the few companies I can recommend. [0] https://buddy.works. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

• Learn to push an empty commit

  For continuous integration, we are using Buddy delivery pipelines which allow us to build, test and deploy applications on a single push to a specific git branch. It helps us to reduce the manual overhead of deploying code to the server and handle all the actions automatically. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

• Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)

  Buddy.works — A CI/CD with 5 free projects and 1 concurrent runs (120 executions/month). - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

• Hide & Seek Code: Part II

  That is when we found out about Buddy. Buddy is one of those easy DIY devops tools out there. Best part is the UI and how easy it is to create a deployment pipeline. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago