Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Kodular VS EJS

Compare Kodular VS EJS and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Kodular logo Kodular

Much more than a modern app creator without coding

EJS logo EJS

An open source JavaScript Template library.
  • Kodular Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-29
  • EJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-11

Kodular features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    Kodular provides a drag-and-drop interface that makes it accessible to users without any coding experience. This visual programming environment allows for rapid development and a lower learning curve.
  • Pre-built Components
    Kodular offers a variety of pre-built components and modules that simplify the development process. These components can be easily integrated into projects, saving time and effort.
  • Cross-platform Compatibility
    Apps created on Kodular can be exported to function on multiple platforms such as Android. This ensures wider reach and user base for the applications developed.
  • Community Support
    Kodular has an active community and forum where users can seek help, share tutorials, and find resources. This sense of community can be invaluable for troubleshooting and learning.
  • Cost-effective
    Kodular is free to use, which is ideal for beginners and small developers or businesses that may not have substantial budgets for app development.

Possible disadvantages of Kodular

  • Limited Customization
    Due to its drag-and-drop nature, Kodular may not offer the level of customization and flexibility that traditional coding environments provide. Advanced developers might find this restrictive.
  • Performance Issues
    Apps built using Kodular might face performance challenges, especially for more complex applications, as the underlying code may not be as optimized as hand-written code.
  • Dependency on Platform
    Developers are dependent on the Kodular platform for updates, support, and continued service. Any changes or shutdowns can directly affect the ongoing projects.
  • Export Limitations
    Currently, Kodular primarily supports Android, limiting the reach for iOS users unless additional steps and tools are utilized to convert the application.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic app development is easy, utilizing advanced features may still require a significant amount of learning and adjustment for new users.

EJS features and specs

  • Simplicity
    EJS is easy to learn and use, especially for developers who are already familiar with JavaScript. The syntax is straightforward, making it a good choice for quick application development.
  • JavaScript Integration
    Since EJS templates are JavaScript files, you can seamlessly integrate JavaScript code, making it easy to manipulate data and use familiar JavaScript functions.
  • Lightweight
    EJS is a lightweight template engine, which makes it an optimal choice for applications where performance and simplicity are critical.
  • Flexibility
    Allows for the embedding of plain JavaScript within the templates, giving developers the flexibility to add logic directly in their HTML.
  • Partial Templates
    Supports partials, which help to reuse code snippets across different views, promoting DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principles.
  • Server-Side Rendering
    Supports server-side rendering, which can improve performance by reducing the amount of client-side processing needed.

Possible disadvantages of EJS

  • Limited Functionality
    Compared to more feature-rich template engines like Handlebars or Pug, EJS offers limited functionalities which might be a drawback for large, complex projects.
  • Debugging
    Debugging EJS templates can sometimes be challenging. Errors within templates can often be vague, making it difficult to trace the root cause.
  • Maintenance
    Embedding a lot of JavaScript within templates can make the code harder to read and maintain, especially as the complexity of the application grows.
  • Performance Overhead
    For very large and complex templates, EJS can introduce a performance overhead compared to more optimized template engines designed for high performance.
  • Community and Support
    While EJS has a reasonable user base, the community and support may not be as extensive as more popular alternatives like React or Vue.js.

Kodular videos

Kodular Vs Other App Builders ! Facts online App Builder 🔥

More videos:

  • Review - Getting Started | Kodular Creator
  • Review - Must Know | Kodular AdSense terminated : New Rules New release #NewAdsSystem

EJS videos

Kane Creek - Bestop Trail Review at EJS 2019

More videos:

  • Tutorial - JavaScript Templating Tutorial | Introduction To EJS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Kodular and EJS)
Application Builder
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
IDE
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Kodular and EJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Kodular and EJS

Kodular Reviews

Top 5 App Builder To Build Your Own App Without Coding
This app builder will show ads in your app after Approval in Kodular. Getting Approval for ads in Kodular is hard. but don't worry. I had a trick to show ads without Approval in kodular. Just create an app and publish it in the play store. Ads will appear without Approval in kodular. This app builder contains all required components, and you can also import extensions in...
Thunkable Alternatives with Advanced Options [Easy App Building]
Kodular also offer prebuild plugins and other modules that you can utilize to create your apps. And these modules will help you to add more flexibility and functionality into your apps.

EJS Reviews

We have no reviews of EJS yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, EJS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Kodular mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Kodular yet. Tracking of Kodular recommendations started around Mar 2021.

EJS mentions (26)

  • Next.js vs Express: What to Choose in 2025?
    Express does not provide SEO benefits by default and would require additional configuration with tools like EJS (Embedded JavaScript) or Handlebars for server-side rendering. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Chapter 7: HTML part two
    For a more robust approach, we'd probably need to install a templating language of some kind, such as Twig, EJS, Handlebars, Pug or Mustache (this is not a complete list!). Reading the documentation for posthtml-modules, you'll notice it doesn't mention package.json or any of the approaches we've used in this guide. Instead, the examples are in JavaScript and we've advised to add this to our Node application. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Web Components and SSR - 2024 Edition
    Server-side Framework SSR is when you use a framework that runs the HTML templating logic entirely on the server to compose the HTML that will be rendered in the browser. These are frameworks like Ruby on Rails, ASP.Net, PHP, or even Node.js frameworks that use templating languages like Pug or EJS. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • How to Build an Application With Node.js
    We need a templating engine to render HTML code in the browser using Node.js. We'll use ejs (Embedded JavaScript) for this tutorial but there are others such as Pug (formerly known as Jade) and Express Handlebar, which also render HTML on the server. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Getting to the meat and potatoes of serverless recipe parsing with Amazon Bedrock
    The tags is where you put the HTML you want Claude to read. The <%- document %> contained within is an ejs placeholder. More on this shortly. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Kodular and EJS, you can also consider the following products

Thunkable - Powerful but easy to use, drag-and-drop mobile app builder.

Mustache.js - Minimal templating with {{mustaches}} in JavaScript - janl/mustache.js

MIT App Inventor - App Inventor is a cloud-based tool, which means you can create apps for phones or tablets right in your web browser.

Handlebars - Handlebars is a JavaScript template library that is, more or less, based on ...

Bubble.io - Building tech is slow and expensive. Bubble is the most powerful no-code platform for creating digital products.

Vue.js - Reactive Components for Modern Web Interfaces