KintoHub VS Zuul

KintoHub Reviews

1. Blake    

   Designer at Happyer | over 3 years ago
   It's like the modern heroku!

   It's very easy to deploy anything on KintoHub. It's really a full-stack solution, unlike many others that have obstacles when deploying a database or aggressive pricing. The free tier is very generous to get started with a hobby app and try it out first. If you add your card you can get more flexibility as well with the advanced customizations on the resources.

   🏁 Competitors: Heroku, Netlify, Firebase, Okteto, Vercel

   👍 Pros:    Super simple|Language agnostic|You're not locked in. it's easy to move here.|Fully customized cloud resources|Generouous free plan|Very responsive support on discord

   👎 Cons:    It's a new platform so it's really great for hobby projects at the moment|No teams yet

Zuul Reviews

KintoHub mentions (0)

Zuul mentions (12)

• How do you handle CI/CD for multiple repos that are dependent on each other

  Zuul (https://zuul-ci.org ) is specifically built for this use case. It was originally designed for OpenStack's CI, with OpenStack being broken down in multiple inter-dependent repos. Source: 5 months ago

• Beginner trying to set up CI/CD pipeline for small team and deciding between GitLab, Jenkins, etc

  If you’re already using gerrit I would strongly recommend looking at Zuul https://zuul-ci.org. Source: 10 months ago

• F/OSS Spotlight: 🧑‍💻 Zuul

  Zuul (code) helps your team stop merging broken code -- the best kind of gatekeeping. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

• [ANN] zuul.el: An interface to Zuul from Emacs

  I wanted to share a package that I have created, and use, to interface the Zuul CI from Emacs. It offers completion for builds or buildsets, and implements a zuul-log-mode to browse the remote logs. Source: almost 2 years ago

• Announcing Trunk Merge

  Yay, yet another proprietary Zuul clone! 😶. Source: almost 2 years ago