Keycloak Reviews

GitHub Reviews

1. Reinhard

   | Boss at CLOUD Meister | over 3 years ago
   perfect 4 open Source

Keycloak mentions (4)

• Beyond the login page

  Most of the time nowadays, I prefer offloading this to an identity provider, using OpenID Connect or soon Federated Credential Management (FedCM), even if that means shipping an identity provider as part of the deliverables (I generally go with Keycloak, with keycloak-config-cli to provision its configuration). I'm obviously biased though as I work in IT services, developping software mainly for... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

• Okta Says Hackers Stole Data for All Customer Support Users

  Yet another breach of Okta... Why are companies not running something like keycloak [1] themselves? Are administrative/maintenance costs too high or is it plausible deniability? [1] https://keycloak.org. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

• I built a ready-to-use auth server with TypeScript and Express.js

  I'd stick with a solution like https://keycloak.org in that instance. Source: about 1 year ago

• Authelia is an open-source authentication/authorization server with 2FA/SSO

  A few more projects in this space: - Keycloak (you won't get fired for picking this)[0] - CloudFoundry's UAA[1] - Gluu [2] - Keratin [3] - OpenUnison [4] - Dex[5] - Netlify's GoTrue[6] All of these solutions are a bit different but here are some of the axes: - Whether or not they function as an OAuth provider - Whether they're centered around application-user-login (email + password) or application auth (OAuth) or... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

GitHub mentions (2069)

• Kubernetes: Hello World

  Image Registry Account: Sign up for an account on GitHub, DockerHub, or any other container image registry. You'll use this account to store and manage your container images. - Source: dev.to / about 19 hours ago

• Ask HN: Why my post labled FLAGGED and how to prevent it?

  I think it would be more reasonable to judge whether it is promotion according to its content, quality, purpose, instead of domain name. I totally agree one should get flagged if one posts the same product or application for the same use case again and again. But in my situation, they are different tools for different use cases. I don't think this demo would get flagged if it was uploaded and presented in the... - Source: Hacker News / 1 day ago

• Next Generation SQL Injection: Github Actions Edition

  Steps: - name: Generate summary run: | echo "Pull Request for [${{ github.event.pull_request.title }}](https://github.com/${{ github.repository }}/pull/${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}) has been updated 🎉" >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY echo "Image tagged **v${{ needs.determine_app_version.outputs.app_version }}** has been built and pushed to the registry." >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY This will... - Source: dev.to / 2 days ago

• Effortless Code Conventions Review for Pull Request Changes

  Source 'https://rubygems.org' Git_source(:github) do |repo_name| repo_name = "#{repo_name}/#{repo_name}" unless repo_name.include?("/") "https://github.com/#{repo_name}.git" End Gem 'pronto' Gem 'oj' Gem 'pronto-rubocop', require: false Gem 'pronto-scss', require: false Gem 'pronto-eslint', require: false Gem 'pronto-brakeman', require: false Gem 'pronto-rails_best_practices', require: false. - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago

• GitHub Copilot tutorial: We’ve tested it with Java and here's how you can do it too

  You can configure GitHub Copilot when purchasing a subscription plan, and the settings can also be changed after activating the account in the organization's account settings on GitHub. At the account level, there were two key parameters for our use case to configure in GitHub Copilot, described in the table below. - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago