Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

jsPerf VS Flent

Compare jsPerf VS Flent and see what are their differences

jsPerf logo jsPerf

A performance playground for JavaScript developers. Easily create and share test cases and run cross-browser benchmarks to find out which code snippet is most efficient.

Flent logo Flent

The FLExible Network Tester
  • jsPerf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-01-26
  • Flent Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-07

jsPerf features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Flent features and specs

  • Comprehensive Network Testing
    Flent provides a wide range of network testing capabilities, allowing users to perform detailed analyses of network performance through various pre-configured tests and scenarios.
  • Open Source
    Flent is open source, which means users can freely use, modify, and distribute the software. This also allows for community contributions and transparency in its development.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Flent can be run on multiple operating systems, including Linux, MacOS, and Windows, making it versatile for various user environments.
  • Extensive Documentation
    The Flent website and other resources offer extensive documentation, which helps users to understand and effectively utilize the software's features.
  • Integration with Other Tools
    Flent integrates well with other network measurement tools like netperf, iperf, and tc, enhancing its ability to perform robust network testing.

Possible disadvantages of Flent

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The comprehensive nature of Flent can be overwhelming for beginners or those unfamiliar with network testing, as it requires some technical knowledge to set up and interpret results.
  • Limited GUI Support
    While Flent does offer a graphical user interface, the primary interaction with the tool is through command-line, which may not be as user-friendly for some users.
  • Performance Dependent on External Tools
    Flent largely relies on other network testing tools for its operations, which means any limitations of these tools can affect the overall performance and results of Flent tests.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running comprehensive network tests using Flent can be resource-intensive, requiring significant processing power and memory, especially for detailed or prolonged tests.

jsPerf videos

No jsPerf videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Flent videos

Flent b091 unboxing & review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to jsPerf and Flent)
Log Management
49 49%
51% 51
Monitoring Tools
39 39%
61% 61
Network & Admin
36 36%
64% 64
File Transfer
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using jsPerf and Flent. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Flent seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

jsPerf mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of jsPerf yet. Tracking of jsPerf recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Flent mentions (7)

  • Most accurate internet speed test.
    You should try Flent from the BufferBloat project. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Tools for measuring Network convergence, delay and packet loss
    Flent (Flexible Network Tester) is a powerful network testing utility that aims to simplify the process of gathering and analyzing network performance metrics. Built on top of other open-source tools like Netperf, Iperf, and Ping, Flent automates the process of running multiple tests simultaneously and aggregates the results into comprehensive, easy-to-interpret graphs. Flent's ability to run various tests in... Source: about 2 years ago
  • Help eliminating buffer bloat on connection speeds over 1gbps
    Hmm... It does not take much packet loss to slow tcp down at that rate. A better test would run longer than waveform, like the flent.org tcp_ndown test. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Loaded latency with fast.com?
    Also most of our web based tests do not last long enough to show the full extent of the problem. Waveform, while pretty good, doesn't test up and down simultaneously, nor does it last long enough. I've put out a few measurements here or there about what Starlink looks like over time, such as most recently, over here: https://github.com/mininet/mininet/issues/1119 - long term spikes for "Working latency" on... Source: about 3 years ago
  • 6.6 is out
    Install Flent. See the bottom of https://flent.org/ for instructions. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing jsPerf and Flent, you can also consider the following products

benchmark.js - A benchmarking library that supports high-resolution timers & returns statistically significant results.

iperf - A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool

NetIO-GUI - NetIO-GUI is a Windows frontend for the multiplatform commandline utility 'netio'.

JPerf - This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.

PPerf - PowerShell Iperf GUI - A PowerShell script to start iperf and show the output (similar to Jperf).

NetStress - NetStress is a user-friendly benchmarking tool that is mostly used by networking professionals to measure the network performance of both wired and wireless connections.