JSDoc VS MooTools

JSDoc Reviews

MooTools Reviews

JSDoc mentions (50)

• Deep Dive: Google Apps Script - Testing APIs and Automating Sheets

  Note: For simplicity, I will omit the JavaScript documentation, but for a production grade code you may want to add the documentation (see jsdoc.app website for more). - Source: dev.to / about 22 hours ago

• Figma's Journey to TypeScript

  You may like JSDoc[1] if you just want some type-safety from the IDE without the compilation overhead. It’s done wonders when I’ve had to wrangle poorly commented legacy JavaScript codebases where most of the overhead is tracing what type the input parameters are. Personally, I’m impartial to TypeScript or JSDoc at this point. But I’d rather have either over plain JavaScript. [1] https://jsdoc.app/. - Source: Hacker News / 13 days ago

• Eloquent JavaScript 4th edition (2024)

  I wholeheartedly agree. At most, I introduce JSDoc[1] to newer developers as standardising how parameters and whatnot are commented at least gets you better documentation and _some_ safety without adding any TS knowledge overhead. [1] https://jsdoc.app/. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

• Add typing to your Javascript code (without Typescript, kinda) ✍🏼

  The best way to do this, of course, is with JSDoc. But something I always found awkward about jsdoc is defining the object types in the same file. So, after a lot of reading, I found a way to combine JSDoc with declaration type files from Typescript. Let me give you an example:. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• What is JSDoc and why you may not need typescript for your next project?

  There is a lot of specific symbols presented on the JSDOC specification that can be found here: https://jsdoc.app. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

MooTools mentions (2)

• Building a dynamic Canvas rendering engine using JSX

  JSX, in my opinion, was the biggest innovation that came out of React given that you could write HTML directly in your JavaScript. I had used other frameworks such as MooTools in the past. You could use them to dynamically construct HTML in JavaScript, but with a very verbose and tedious syntax. It looked very similar to the converted code above. And it worked, but it was not satisfying or pleasant. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago

• jQuery 3.6.0 Released - "We still have our eyes on a jQuery 4.0 release"

  For those who don't like jQuery - there is a great alternative https://mootools.net/ 😃. Source: about 3 years ago