Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

jQuery File Upload VS CarrierWave

Compare jQuery File Upload VS CarrierWave and see what are their differences

jQuery File Upload logo jQuery File Upload

File Upload widget with multiple file selection, drag&drop support, progress bar, validation and preview images, audio and video for jQuery. Supports cross-domain, chunked and resumable file up...

CarrierWave logo CarrierWave

Solution for file uploads for Rails, Sinatra and other Ruby web frameworks.
  • jQuery File Upload Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-22
  • CarrierWave Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-15

jQuery File Upload features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

CarrierWave features and specs

  • Flexibility
    CarrierWave allows extensive customization of file uploading processes, including the ability to define custom processors, versions, and storage backends, making it highly adaptable to different project requirements.
  • Integration with Rails
    CarrierWave is well-integrated with Ruby on Rails, providing easy-to-use generators and seamless ActiveRecord integration, which simplifies adding file uploads to Rails applications.
  • Multiple Storage Options
    It supports various storage backends like file system, AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage, and others, enabling developers to choose the best storage option for their application's needs.
  • Versioning Support
    CarrierWave supports creating different versions of uploaded files (e.g., thumbnails for images), which is useful for applications that need various formats or sizes of the original file.

Possible disadvantages of CarrierWave

  • Learning Curve
    New users might find CarrierWave's extensive configuration options overwhelming due to its numerous features and customizations.
  • Gem Dependencies
    CarrierWave may add additional dependencies to a project, which could lead to version conflicts or increased maintenance efforts.
  • Lack of Built-in Image Processing
    CarrierWave relies on other gems, such as MiniMagick or RMagick, for image processing, requiring additional setup and configuration for image manipulation features.
  • Performance Considerations
    The default file storage mechanism may not be suitable for large-scale applications needing high upload volumes, and setting up alternative storage solutions like AWS S3 requires extra configuration.

jQuery File Upload videos

No jQuery File Upload videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

CarrierWave videos

Recipe App Video 4 - Setting Up Image Uploads using Carrierwave Gem

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to jQuery File Upload and CarrierWave)
Digital Asset Management
100 100%
0% 0
CDN
22 22%
78% 78
File Uploader
0 0%
100% 100
Content Delivery Network
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using jQuery File Upload and CarrierWave. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CarrierWave seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

jQuery File Upload mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of jQuery File Upload yet. Tracking of jQuery File Upload recommendations started around Mar 2021.

CarrierWave mentions (2)

  • Released a Library for Synchronous Execution of Asynchronous Processes in JS/TS
    Accel Record is also designed to be similar to Ruby on Rails' Active Record in terms of usability, and one of the things I want to achieve in the future is to create a library like CarrierWave. CarrierWave allows you to save images to external storage services (such as AWS S3) when saving records, and to achieve this with Accel Record, it is necessary to execute asynchronous processes such as image uploads... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Carrier Wave and How to Test Uploading a New Image to a ActiveRecord::Base Model
    We’re a Rails shop at Forem. In the Forem code base we use the CarrierWave gem to help with our file uploads. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing jQuery File Upload and CarrierWave, you can also consider the following products

Uploadcare - File uploading, media processing & content delivery for modern web apps

CloudExplorer - Cloud Explorer is a open-source Amazon S3 client.

Upload.js - JavaScript File Upload Library — with Integrated Cloud Storage.

Paperclip - A faster way to user interfaces for React applications

FileDrop.js - Self-contained cross-browser HTML5, legacy, AJAX, drag & drop JavaScript file upload. Dependencies-free. With jQuery plugin.

AssetPicker - A free, easy to use, cross plattform ready asset or file picker.