Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
JP

JPerf VS PacketCheck

Compare JPerf VS PacketCheck and see what are their differences

NinjaOne
NinjaOne (Formerly NinjaRMM) provides remote monitoring and management software that combines powerful functionality with a fast, modern UI. Easily remediate IT issues, automate common tasks, and support end-users with powerful IT management tools. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

JPerf logo JPerf

This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.

PacketCheck logo PacketCheck

GL's PacketCheck™- is a PC based Ethernet test tool that is designed to check frame transport
  • JPerf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-10
  • PacketCheck Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-06

JPerf features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    JPerf provides a graphical user interface, making it easier for users who are not comfortable with command line tools to perform network performance testing.
  • Cross-platform Compatibility
    JPerf is built on Java, which allows it to run on multiple operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS without modifications.
  • Network Performance Visualization
    JPerf offers graphical representations of network performance, such as throughput and jitter, making it easier to understand the results.
  • Integration with iPerf
    JPerf utilizes iPerf as the backend, benefiting from iPerf's robust network performance testing capabilities.
  • Customizable Testing Parameters
    Users can customize parameters like protocols, port numbers, and bandwidth, providing flexibility in performance testing.

Possible disadvantages of JPerf

  • Abandonware
    JPerf has not been actively maintained for several years, which means it may lack support for new features or bug fixes.
  • Limited Functionality Compared to CLI
    While the GUI is user-friendly, some advanced functionalities available in the iPerf command line version are not accessible in JPerf.
  • Dependency on Java
    As JPerf requires Java to run, users must ensure that Java is installed and correctly configured on their systems.
  • Potential Compatibility Issues
    Due to its lack of updates, JPerf may face compatibility issues with newer versions of operating systems or Java.

PacketCheck features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

JPerf videos

+ Add

[HOWTO] Test My Network Speed?! [iPerf & JPerf]

PacketCheck videos

No PacketCheck videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to JPerf and PacketCheck)

JPerf

PacketCheck

Monitoring Tools
86 86%
Monitoring Tools
14% 14
Network & Admin
82 82%
Network & Admin
18% 18
Log Management
83 83%
Log Management
17% 17
Tool
78 78%
Tool
22% 22

User comments

Share your experience with using JPerf and PacketCheck. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing JPerf and PacketCheck, you can also consider the following products

iperf - A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool

SASUnit - SASUnit is a collection of programs and macros that are mostly used by networking experts to execute codes and verify results by inspecting datasets, macro-variables, and log files.

TamoSoft Throughput Test - TamoSoft Throughput Test is a utility for testing the performance of a wireless or wired network.

nuttcp - nuttcp is another network test tool, similar to iperf2 and iperf3, that has a number of unique features.

netperf - Netperf is a benchmark that can be used to measure the performance of many different types of networking. It provides tests for both unidirectional throughput, and end-to-end latency. - HewlettPack...

NetStress - NetStress is a user-friendly benchmarking tool that is mostly used by networking professionals to measure the network performance of both wired and wireless connections.

Loading...