Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
JP

NetStress VS JPerf

Compare NetStress VS JPerf and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

NetStress logo NetStress

NetStress is a user-friendly benchmarking tool that is mostly used by networking professionals to measure the network performance of both wired and wireless connections.

JPerf logo JPerf

This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.
  • NetStress Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-04
  • JPerf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-10

NetStress features and specs

  • Easy to Use
    NetStress offers a user-friendly interface which makes it easy for both beginners and experienced users to perform network performance tests.
  • Comprehensive Testing
    NetStress provides a range of testing features, allowing users to assess various aspects of their network's performance, such as throughput and latency.
  • Real-time Graphs
    The software includes real-time graphical displays of network performance metrics, providing users with instant feedback during tests.
  • Local Network Testing
    NetStress is designed to test wireless and wired networks on a local scale, which can be particularly useful for home or small office environments.

Possible disadvantages of NetStress

  • Limited to Local Networks
    NetStress is intended for local network testing only, which may not be suitable for those looking to test larger or external networks.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    While it provides core network testing capabilities, users seeking more advanced or enterprise-level features might find NetStress lacking.
  • Windows-Only
    NetStress is limited to the Windows platform, which excludes Mac and Linux users from utilizing this tool.
  • Static Testing
    The tool is primarily focused on static testing scenarios and may not support dynamic assessment of networks under varying load conditions.

JPerf features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    JPerf provides a graphical user interface, making it easier for users who are not comfortable with command line tools to perform network performance testing.
  • Cross-platform Compatibility
    JPerf is built on Java, which allows it to run on multiple operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS without modifications.
  • Network Performance Visualization
    JPerf offers graphical representations of network performance, such as throughput and jitter, making it easier to understand the results.
  • Integration with iPerf
    JPerf utilizes iPerf as the backend, benefiting from iPerf's robust network performance testing capabilities.
  • Customizable Testing Parameters
    Users can customize parameters like protocols, port numbers, and bandwidth, providing flexibility in performance testing.

Possible disadvantages of JPerf

  • Abandonware
    JPerf has not been actively maintained for several years, which means it may lack support for new features or bug fixes.
  • Limited Functionality Compared to CLI
    While the GUI is user-friendly, some advanced functionalities available in the iPerf command line version are not accessible in JPerf.
  • Dependency on Java
    As JPerf requires Java to run, users must ensure that Java is installed and correctly configured on their systems.
  • Potential Compatibility Issues
    Due to its lack of updates, JPerf may face compatibility issues with newer versions of operating systems or Java.

NetStress videos

+ Add

Netstress

JPerf videos

+ Add

[HOWTO] Test My Network Speed?! [iPerf & JPerf]

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to NetStress and JPerf)

NetStress

JPerf

Monitoring Tools
39 39%
Monitoring Tools
61% 61
Network & Admin
44 44%
Network & Admin
56% 56
Log Management
39 39%
Log Management
61% 61
Tool
41 41%
Tool
59% 59

User comments

Share your experience with using NetStress and JPerf. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, NetStress seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

NetStress mentions (1)

  • How do you Load Test your Wireless router? I did a 1 Hour Continuous Network Speed Test.
    I have a few laptops I use for testing purposes, I connect them all to it and run netstress between them http://nutsaboutnets.com/archives/netstress/ To be fair I've not needed to load test my stuff in a long time but it worked last time I tried it. Source: about 3 years ago

JPerf mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of JPerf yet. Tracking of JPerf recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing NetStress and JPerf, you can also consider the following products

iperf - A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool

netperf - Netperf is a benchmark that can be used to measure the performance of many different types of networking. It provides tests for both unidirectional throughput, and end-to-end latency. - HewlettPack...

TamoSoft Throughput Test - TamoSoft Throughput Test is a utility for testing the performance of a wireless or wired network.

NetIO-GUI - NetIO-GUI is a Windows frontend for the multiplatform commandline utility 'netio'.

LAN Speed Test - LAN Speed Test is a FREE utility designed to accurately measure LAN speeds.

Flent - The FLExible Network Tester

Loading...