Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
JP

JPerf VS benchmark.js

Compare JPerf VS benchmark.js and see what are their differences

Netumo
Ensure healthy website performance, uptime, and free from vulnerabilities. Automatic checks for SSL Certificates, domains and monitor issues with your websites all from one console and get instant notifications on any issues. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

JPerf logo JPerf

This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.

benchmark.js logo benchmark.js

A benchmarking library that supports high-resolution timers & returns statistically significant results.
  • JPerf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-10
  • benchmark.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-01-26

JPerf features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    JPerf provides a graphical user interface, making it easier for users who are not comfortable with command line tools to perform network performance testing.
  • Cross-platform Compatibility
    JPerf is built on Java, which allows it to run on multiple operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS without modifications.
  • Network Performance Visualization
    JPerf offers graphical representations of network performance, such as throughput and jitter, making it easier to understand the results.
  • Integration with iPerf
    JPerf utilizes iPerf as the backend, benefiting from iPerf's robust network performance testing capabilities.
  • Customizable Testing Parameters
    Users can customize parameters like protocols, port numbers, and bandwidth, providing flexibility in performance testing.

Possible disadvantages of JPerf

  • Abandonware
    JPerf has not been actively maintained for several years, which means it may lack support for new features or bug fixes.
  • Limited Functionality Compared to CLI
    While the GUI is user-friendly, some advanced functionalities available in the iPerf command line version are not accessible in JPerf.
  • Dependency on Java
    As JPerf requires Java to run, users must ensure that Java is installed and correctly configured on their systems.
  • Potential Compatibility Issues
    Due to its lack of updates, JPerf may face compatibility issues with newer versions of operating systems or Java.

benchmark.js features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

JPerf videos

+ Add

[HOWTO] Test My Network Speed?! [iPerf & JPerf]

benchmark.js videos

No benchmark.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to JPerf and benchmark.js)

JPerf

benchmark.js

Monitoring Tools
76 76%
Monitoring Tools
24% 24
Log Management
73 73%
Log Management
27% 27
Network & Admin
75 75%
Network & Admin
25% 25
Tool
100 100%
Tool
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using JPerf and benchmark.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, benchmark.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

JPerf mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of JPerf yet. Tracking of JPerf recommendations started around Mar 2021.

benchmark.js mentions (3)

  • Is there a way to automate performance tests?
    We have a series of benchmark suites using https://benchmarkjs.com/. Every CI run saves the results of the benchmarks to a json file that we persist across runs and can compare against. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • How do you test performance of a function in your tests?
    We use https://benchmarkjs.com/ to get statistically significant results, then write the results with the git hash to get a view of performance after every CI build. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • How to run benchmark tests in node
    Https://benchmarkjs.com is what you want. Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing JPerf and benchmark.js, you can also consider the following products

iperf - A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool

jsPerf - A performance playground for JavaScript developers. Easily create and share test cases and run cross-browser benchmarks to find out which code snippet is most efficient.

TamoSoft Throughput Test - TamoSoft Throughput Test is a utility for testing the performance of a wireless or wired network.

netperf - Netperf is a benchmark that can be used to measure the performance of many different types of networking. It provides tests for both unidirectional throughput, and end-to-end latency. - HewlettPack...

PPerf - PowerShell Iperf GUI - A PowerShell script to start iperf and show the output (similar to Jperf).

NetStress - NetStress is a user-friendly benchmarking tool that is mostly used by networking professionals to measure the network performance of both wired and wireless connections.

Loading...