Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Jmpress.js VS Apache Traffic Server

Compare Jmpress.js VS Apache Traffic Server and see what are their differences

GoToMyPC
Remotely access your computer from anywhere on any device! Discover productivity and flexibility with GoToMyPC remote desktop software. Try it Free! featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Jmpress.js logo Jmpress.js

Jmpress.js is a tool having the definitive source of one of the best JavaScript libraries, frameworks, and plugins.

Apache Traffic Server logo Apache Traffic Server

Fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/S 2 and 1.1 compliant caching proxy server.
  • Jmpress.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-16
  • Apache Traffic Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29

Jmpress.js features and specs

  • 3D Transitions
    Jmpress.js provides impressive 3D transitions for presentations that can make your slides visually appealing.
  • Customizability
    It offers a high level of customizability, allowing developers to fine-tune animations and transitions to fit their specific needs.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, it allows users to contribute to its development or adapt it for their particular use cases.
  • Cross-Browser Support
    Designed to work across various web browsers, enhancing compatibility and user reach.

Possible disadvantages of Jmpress.js

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The library may have a steep learning curve for beginners, especially those not familiar with JavaScript or web development.
  • Performance Issues
    3D transitions and animations might lead to performance issues, especially on older devices or browsers.
  • Dependencies
    It may require additional libraries or dependencies to unlock its full potential, complicating the setup process.
  • Limited Community Support
    The community around jmpress.js might not be as large or active as those around more popular libraries, potentially making troubleshooting harder.

Apache Traffic Server features and specs

  • High Performance
    Apache Traffic Server is designed for high-speed caching and can handle large volumes of traffic efficiently. Its architecture allows it to serve requests with low latency, making it suitable for high-traffic websites and applications.
  • Scalability
    It offers robust scalability features, allowing it to manage multiple terabytes of data and scale up to handle many clients simultaneously, which is beneficial for growing businesses and expanding infrastructure.
  • Extensibility
    Traffic Server supports plugins and extensions, enabling developers to customize and extend its functionality to suit specific needs, which adds flexibility for unique requirements.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, Apache Traffic Server offers a free solution with a strong community support, allowing users to collaborate and contribute to its development and troubleshoot issues.
  • SSL Termination
    It provides the capability to handle SSL termination, which offloads the burden from backend servers, improving overall security and performance for HTTPS traffic.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Traffic Server

  • Complex Configuration
    The configuration of Apache Traffic Server can be complex, especially for beginners, which might require a steep learning curve and extensive documentation reading or seeking community help.
  • Limited Windows Support
    Traffic Server is primarily developed for Unix-based systems and has limited support for Windows, which can be a limitation for organizations that primarily operate in a Windows environment.
  • Community Support
    While it benefits from open-source community support, it may not have the same level of professional support or comprehensive documentation as some commercial alternatives, potentially leading to slower resolution of issues.
  • Resource Intensive
    When handling large amounts of traffic, Apache Traffic Server can become resource-intensive, which may necessitate higher hardware investments to maintain optimal performance.

Jmpress.js videos

No Jmpress.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Apache Traffic Server videos

+ Add

Transparent HTTP proxying with Apache Traffic Server

More videos:

  • Review - Yahoo's Adventure with Apache Traffic Server - Shu Kit Chan, Vijay Prashanth Hosahithlu

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Jmpress.js and Apache Traffic Server)

Jmpress.js

Apache Traffic Server

Proxy
46 46%
Proxy
54% 54
Proxy Server
36 36%
Proxy Server
64% 64
Development
100 100%
Development
0% 0
DevOps Tools
25 25%
DevOps Tools
75% 75

User comments

Share your experience with using Jmpress.js and Apache Traffic Server. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Traffic Server seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Jmpress.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Jmpress.js yet. Tracking of Jmpress.js recommendations started around Jul 2021.

Apache Traffic Server mentions (6)

  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Apache Traffic Server — A free, fast, and scalable HTTP caching system that improves network efficiency. It supports forward and reverse proxy caching and is configurable to run simultaneously on either or both options. It also provides authentication and basic authorization through plugins. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Wikipedia now has up to 1000X reduction of ATS disk read latency at the p999
    Apache Traffic Server: https://trafficserver.apache.org/ Here’s how they use it along with Varnish: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Caching_overview. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • How does Content delivery/distribution network work?
    The LARGE majority of CDNs use either Apache Traffic Server (https://trafficserver.apache.org/) or Nginx for their cache webserver, so the mechanisms used are pretty easy to find if you look through the docs. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Using Nginx as an Object Storage Gateway
    Apache Traffic Server (no relation to Apache itself) would be an excellent option: https://trafficserver.apache.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Build a CDN in about 5 hours
    We have choices. We could use Varnish (scripting! Edge side includes! PHK blog posts!). We could use Apache Traffic Server (being the only new team this year to use ATS!). Or we could use NGINX (we're already running it!). The only certainty is that you'll come to hate whichever one you pick. Try them all and pick the one you hate the least. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Jmpress.js and Apache Traffic Server, you can also consider the following products

fullPage.js - fullPage.js is a rich-featured plugin developed by Alvaro Trigo, which offers you a way to eliminate the full height restrictions from its section and slides.

Squid Proxy - Website Content Acceleration and Distribution. Thousands of web-sites around the Internet use Squid to drastically increase their content delivery. Squid can reduce your server load and improve delivery speeds to clients.

Clusterize.js - Clusterize.js is an all-in-one plugin mostly used by professional developers that dynamically create tables that often need in HTML service.

3proxy - 3proxy freeware proxy server for Windows and Unix. HTTP, SOCKS, FTP, POP3

Infinite Scroll - New! JavaScript and jQuery plugin to automatically add next pages.

CCProxy - Want to share Internet connection? Get every computer online through a single Internet connection?

Loading...